Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

An Evaluation of Functional, Aesthetic, Structural qualities and Satisfaction in Selected Students’ Housing for the University

Pages
1–27
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study concluded that, Functional, Aesthetic, Structural qualities and Satisfaction are important in the overall Students’ Housing for Obafemi Awolowo University.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study evaluated the functional, Aesthetic, structural and satisfaction in students’ housing in selected Students’ Housing for the University, It examined the socio- economic characteristics of the users, evaluated functional, aesthetic, structural qualities in selected students’ housing for Obafemi Awolowo University and examined residential satisfaction in the halls.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sampling frame showed that 5,038 students at O.A.U were found in 1,078 rooms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concluded that, Functional, Aesthetic, Structural qualities and Satisfaction are important in the overall Students’ Housing for Obafemi Awolowo University.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study evaluated the functional, Aesthetic, structural and satisfaction in students’ housing in selected Students’ Housing for the University, It examined the socio- economic characteristics of the users, evaluated functional, aesthetic, structural qualities in selected students’ housing for Obafemi Awolowo University and examined residential satisfaction in the halls. This was with a view to providing policy interventions for the designers of halls of residences for the Universities. Primary data were obtained through survey method. Obafemi Awolowo University (O.A.U) was the University of Study for the research project. Five hostels at O.A.U were purposively selected to capture variation in gender, level of study and hostel design across the University. The sampling frame showed that 5,038 students at O.A.U were found in 1,078 rooms. One out of every five (20%) were selected at O.A.U which amounted to 215 students sampled at O.A.U. Secondary data was obtained from the Physical Planning Department of O.A.U. The data collected were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results from the frequency distribution shows that the functional qualities of the hostels were perceived among the students of O.A.U to be excellent (76.2%). Similarly, both aesthetics (79%) and structural (82.3%) qualities of the hostels are perceived as very good among the students of O.A.U. Also, all respondents of the hotels were not satisfied with various services and amenities provided in the Halls of Residence generally (40.0%) and 39.1% expressed neutral satisfaction. The study concluded that, Functional, Aesthetic, Structural qualities and Satisfaction are important in the overall Students’ Housing for Obafemi Awolowo University.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKINLUYI, M. L. (2022). An Evaluation of Functional, Aesthetic, Structural qualities and Satisfaction in Selected Students’ Housing for the University. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 1–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/538382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adriaanse, C.C.M. (2007). “Measuring Residential Satisfaction: A Residential Environmental Satisfaction Scale (RESS)”. Journal of Housing Built Environment. 22, 287–304. Amérigo, M., and Aragonés, J.I. (1997). “A Theoretical and Methodological Approach to the Study of Residential Satisfaction”. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 47- 57. Amole, D. (2005). “Coping Strategies for Living in Student Residential Facilities in Nigeria”. Journal of Environmental Behaviour, 37, 201-219.
  2. Amole, D. (2009). “Residential Satisfaction and Levels of Environment in Students’ Residences”. Journal of Environment and Behaviour, 41, 866-879.
  3. Amole, D. (2009a). “Residential Satisfaction in Students' Housing”. Journal Environmental Psychology, 29, 76-85. Aragonés, J.I., Francescato, G. and Garling, T. (2002). “Residential Environment, Choice Satisfaction and Behaviour”. In J.I. Aragonés, G. Francescato and T. Garling (Eds.). Bergin & Garvey. Westport, Connecticut. London. pp. 2-33.
  4. Baba, Y. & Astin, M.D. (1989). “Neighbourhood Environmental Satisfaction, Victimization, and Social participation as Determinant of Perceived Neighbourhood Safety”. Environment & Behaviour, 21, 763-780.
  5. Foubert, J.D., Tepper, R. and Morrison, D.R. (1998). “Predictors of Student Satisfaction in University Residence Halls,” Journal of College and University Student Housing, 27, 41-46.
  6. Francescato, G., Weidemann, S., and Anderson, J.R. (1987). “Residential Satisfaction: Its Uses and Limitations in Housing Research”, in W.V. Vliet, H. Choldin, W. Michelson and D. Popenoe (eds.) Housing and Neighbourhoods: Theoreticaland Empirical Contributions. New York: Greenwood Press.
  7. Hassanain, M.A. (2008). “On the Performance Evaluation of Sustainable Student Housing Facilities”. Journal of Facilities Management, 6, 212-225.
  8. Karlin, R.A., Rosen, L.S., and Epstein, Y.M. (1979). “Three Into Two Doesn't Go: A Follow-up on the Effects of Overcrowded Dormitory Rooms”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 391-395.
  9. Kaya, N. and Erkip, F. (2001). “Satisfaction in a Dormitory Building: The Effects of Floor Height on the Perception of Room Size and Crowding”. Journal of Environmental Behaviour, 33, 35-53.
  10. Khozaei, N. Ayub, A.S. Hassan and Khozaei, Z. (2010a). “The Factors Predicting Students' Satisfaction with University Hostels, Case Study of University Sains Malaysia,” Asian Culture and History, 2, 148-158.
  11. Lawson, B. (1980). How Designers Think: the Design Process Demystified. London: Architectural Press. L