Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Examining the Role of Cultural Landscape in Regional Development: Defining Criteria and Looking at Ephesus

Pages
42–65
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is a great need to support community through tools such as awareness raising programmes, regional heritage planning, regional heritage institutions acting as regional agencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The link between regional development and cultural heritage has been at the center of theoretical discussions and practices in the field of preservation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Especially, varieties of practices and regional plans have been developed in different parts of the World such as Europe, Russia and South Africa in order to ensure regional development through cultural heritage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is a great need to support community through tools such as awareness raising programmes, regional heritage planning, regional heritage institutions acting as regional agencies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The link between regional development and cultural heritage has been at the center of theoretical discussions and practices in the field of preservation. Especially, varieties of practices and regional plans have been developed in different parts of the World such as Europe, Russia and South Africa in order to ensure regional development through cultural heritage. In this paper, it is accepted that a cultural landscape, as a sub-region of a particular region, is a relevant and meaningful unit that can contribute to the qualities of the region in terms of socio-cultural and economic aspects. In this context, the main goal of this paper is to develop a set of criteria that will act as a tool for identifying to which aspects of a cultural landscape has the potential to contribute regional development and to evaluate possible contributions of Ephesus and its cultural landscape to regional development. These criteria can be classified according to a framework implying a three-fold classification; improvements in the physical quality of the cultural landscape, economic dimension and socio-cultural dimension. As a result, this case indicates that cultural landscape has great potential to contribute to the social and economic development of a region. There is a great need to support community through tools such as awareness raising programmes, regional heritage planning, regional heritage institutions acting as regional agencies.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, G. (2022). Examining the Role of Cultural Landscape in Regional Development: Defining Criteria and Looking at Ephesus. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 42–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/538350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Abankina, T. (2013). Regional development models using cultural heritage resources. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7 (1), 3–10. Retrieved from.https://www.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/document /98177196. Aminy, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalization. Environment and Planning.A,.(34),.385/99.Retrieved.from.http://epn.sage pub.com/content/34/3/385.full.pdf+html. Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future? Landscape and Urban Planning, 70. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com. Austrian Archaeological Institute. (2014). Vienna: Austria. Begg, I. (1999). Cities and competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36, 795–809. doi:10.1080/0042098993222. Boschma, R. A. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1001- 1014. doi:10.1080/0034340042000292601. Bramwell, B. & Sharman, A. (1999). Collaboration in local tourism policymaking. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 392-415. Retrieved from http://ac.els-cdn.com.
  2. CE. (2000). European landscape convention. Retrieved from http://www.heritagecouncil.ie/ fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Landscape/Europe an_Landscape.pdf. CE. (2015).
  3. Namur declaration, The ministers of the states parties to the European cultural convention meeting in Namur on 2324April2015.Retrievedfrom.https://www.coe.int/t/dg 4/cultureheritage/heritage/6thConfCultural.Heritage/Na mur-Declar_en.pdf. Central Directorate of Revolving Funds. (2009). Muze ve örenyerleri girislerine iliskin sikca sorulan sorular. Retrieved February 18, 2014, from http://dosim.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,51927/muze-veorenyerleri-girislerine-iliskin-sikca-sorulan-s-.html.
  4. Cernea, M. (2001). Cultural heritage and development: A framework for action in the Middle East and North Africa. Retrieved.from.http://documents.worldbank.org/curate d/en/406981468278943948/pdf/225590REPLACEM1 ccession0A2003100110.pdf. Coe, N.M., Hess, M., Yeung, H.W., Dicken, P. & Henderson, J. (2004). ‘Globalizing’ Regional Development: A Global Production Networks Perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29 (4), 468–484. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x. Crouch, G. & Ritchie, J.B.R. (1995). Destination competitiveness and the role of the tourism enterprise. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Business Congress, Istanbul, Turkey (43–8).
  5. Danson, M., Halkier, H. & Damborg, C. (1998). Regional development agencies in Europe: An Introduction and framework for analysis. In H. Halkie