Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as an Assessment Approach for Architectural Design: Case Study of Architectural Design Studio

Pages
217–245
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it has been observedthat the approach has considerable potentials to be further developed toevaluate architectural projects comparatively, especially forarchitectural students’ projects, and other architectural projects such asarchitectural design competitions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Architectural design is complex and can be defined as an effectivedecision-making activity based on problem solving.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data used in the assessment is collected throughinterviews and surveys which is analysed by the help of a software.Based on the outcomes of the AHP-based approach, it has been seen thatthis approach can provide numerical results that are comparable,measurable, gradable, consistent and can be reported separately for each assessor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it has been observedthat the approach has considerable potentials to be further developed toevaluate architectural projects comparatively, especially forarchitectural students’ projects, and other architectural projects such asarchitectural design competitions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Architectural design is complex and can be defined as an effectivedecision-making activity based on problem solving. This complexity isnot based on content and volume of problems, but also heterogeneityand uncertainty of information provided for assessment, subjectiveapproaches, and a large number of the criterion for assessment. The aimof this research paper is to contribute to the researches for assessmentof architectural design by providing a novel approach based on AnalyticHierarchy Process (AHP) – a Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)method. The approach supports an effective comparative analysisamong the alternative projects based on determined criterion. Themethodology is implemented with a case study in one of the designstudios of Department of Architecture of Çankaya University on finaldesign projects of a group of students with observation, research andassessment. The data used in the assessment is collected throughinterviews and surveys which is analysed by the help of a software.Based on the outcomes of the AHP-based approach, it has been seen thatthis approach can provide numerical results that are comparable,measurable, gradable, consistent and can be reported separately for each assessor. However, it has also been found that the AHP-basedmethod is suitable for evaluating only a limited number of projects. Withthe research, and by setting thresholds levels for evaluation, it hasbecome clear that successful and unsuccessful projects can be separatedfor achievement and competence. Consequently, it has been observedthat the approach has considerable potentials to be further developed toevaluate architectural projects comparatively, especially forarchitectural students’ projects, and other architectural projects such asarchitectural design competitions.

🔖

Cite This Article

HARPUTLUGİL, T. (2022). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as an Assessment Approach for Architectural Design: Case Study of Architectural Design Studio. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 217–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/538328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adamović, P., Maja, C.D., Nahod, M. (2008). Expert Choice Model For Choosing Appropriate Trenchless Method For Pipe Laying. Journal of Expert Choice, p. 1-12.
  2. Akadiri, P.O., Olomolaiye P.O., Chinyio E.A. (2013). Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model For The Selection Of Sustainable Materials For Building Projects. Automation in Construction, 30, p. 113-125.
  3. Aksakal, E., Dagdeviren, M., (2015). Talent Management Based Personnel Assignment Model And Solution Proposal. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 30(2), p. 249-262.
  4. Alagbe, O. A., Oluwatayo, A. A., Aderonmu, P. A., & Alalade, G. M. (2015). Difference in Grading Parameters in Architectural Schools And its Impact On the Competency Rating of Future Professionals. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4(3), p. 230-236.
  5. Alessio, I., Ashraf, L. (2009). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and Limitations. OR Insight, 22(4), p. 201–220.
  6. Al-Harbi, K.M.A.S. (2001). Application Of The AHP in Project Management. International Journal Of Project Management, 19(1), p. 19-27.
  7. Ali, H.H., Al Nsairat, S.F. (2009). Developing a Green Building Assessment Tool For Developing Countries–Case of Jordan. Building and Environment, 44(5), p. 1053-1064.
  8. Aminbakhsh, S., Gündüz, M., Sönmez, R., (2013). Safety Risk Assessment Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) During Planning and Budgeting Construction Projects. Journal of Safety Research, 46, p. 99-105.
  9. Arroyo, P., Tommelein, I. D., & Ballard, G. (2014). Comparing AHP and CBA as decision methods to resolve the choosing problem in detailed design. Journal of construction engineering and management, 141(1), 04014063. Bitarafan, M., Hosseini, S. B., Abazarlou, S., Mahmoudzadeh, A. (2015). Selecting the optimal composition of architectural forms from the perspective of civil defense using AHP and IHWP methods, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11:2, 137-148,
  10. Çıkış, Ş., Çil, E. (2009). Problematization Of Assessment İn The Architectural Design Education: First Year As A Case Study. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 1, p. 2103-2110.
  11. Crooks, T. J., Kane, M. T., Cohen, A. S. (1996). Threats to the Valid Use of Assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 3(3), p.265-286.
  12. Davis, D. (1997). Design As A Process The Project Development Process. Annual Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Dickson, M. (2004). Achieving Quality In Building Design By Intention, Designing Better Bu