Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

A Comparison of Classrooms’ Layout Based on The Requirements of Preschool Literacy

Pages
168–186
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While many studies hadfocused on improving the overall environment of the classrooms, fewstudies are established with the focus on design characteristics thatenhance early literacy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Classroom design has claimed to be an important factor in supportingthe pre-schoolers’ literacy development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Comparative studies that reveal similarities anddifferences of design in different contexts and culture would be asignificant attempt to provide a knowledge about the proper physicalenvironment for literacy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While many studies hadfocused on improving the overall environment of the classrooms, fewstudies are established with the focus on design characteristics thatenhance early literacy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Classroom design has claimed to be an important factor in supportingthe pre-schoolers’ literacy development. While many studies hadfocused on improving the overall environment of the classrooms, fewstudies are established with the focus on design characteristics thatenhance early literacy. Comparative studies that reveal similarities anddifferences of design in different contexts and culture would be asignificant attempt to provide a knowledge about the proper physicalenvironment for literacy. This study is set out to compare theappropriateness of classroom design in two private and two publicpreschools in North Cyprus, by evaluating the necessary designcharacteristics for literacy activities. The study proceeds by developingan evaluation framework that analyses the design characteristics ofclassroom in terms of literacy learning, then followed by evaluating thedesign of each classroom by using this framework. The study is finalizedby comparing the findings and discussing the similarities and differencesof design in examined classrooms. Findings revealed that the layout ofprivate classrooms were more literacy-oriented in compare to publicclassrooms, however in none of the classrooms there was any records ofspecific design considerations with the focus of literacy. In general, it wasconcluded that in all four classrooms layout of the classrooms lacked a sensitive design with concern of literacy activities. Results alsodemonstrated that only focusing on classroom will not be enough andconsidering the support for learning literacy in all the available spaces inpreschool will establish more comprehensive results.

🔖

Cite This Article

IZADPANAH, S., GÜNÇE, K. (2022). A Comparison of Classrooms’ Layout Based on The Requirements of Preschool Literacy. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 168–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/538306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Albers, P., Holbrook, T., & Flint, A. S. (2014). New methods of literacy research. New York: Routledge. Beschorner, B. & Hutchison, A. (2013). iPads as a literacy teaching tool in early childhood. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 16-24.
  2. Boys, J. (2011). Towards creative learning spaces re-thinking the architecture of post-compulsory education. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Ciampa, K. (2012). Reading in the digital age: Using electronic books as a teaching tool for beginning readers. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 38(2). Cortes, C., (2013). Designing literacy rich classroom environments for young children: a study of teachers' design processes and tools, Arizona State University. Cunningham, D. D. (2005). Relating quality of urban, public school, preschool classroom environments to the language and literacy development of at-risk pre- school children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, St. Louis. Cunningham, D. D. (2008). Literacy Environment Quality in Preschool and Children’s Attitudes Toward Reading and Writing. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 19-36.
  3. Dickinson, D. K., & Sprague, K. (2002). The nature and impact of early child- hood care environments on the language and literacy development of chil- dren from low-income families. In S. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for early literacy research (pp. 263–280). New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Dickinson, D. K., & Tabors, P. (2001). Beginning literacy with language. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing. Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice, Optimal Books. Graff, H. (1991). The Legacies of Literacy: Continuities and Contradictions in Western Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  5. Hart, B., & Risby, T. (1995). Meaningful difference in the everyday lives of young American children. Baltimore: Brooks Publishing. Hille, R. (2011). Modern schools: A century of design for education. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley and Sons. Izadpanah, S. & Günçe, K. (2014). Integration of Educational Method and Physical Settings: Design Guideline for High/Scope Methodology in Preschool, South African Journal of Education, 34(2). 1-17.
  6. Izadpanah, S. (2016). A Post Occupancy Quality Evaluation Model for Preschool Settings’ Interior Spaces (PSIS) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eastern Mediterranean University. Könings, K. D., Brand‐Gruwel S. & Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005). Towards more powerful learning envir