Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Calligraphy as a Metaphoric Tool for Basic Design Courses

Pages
187–204
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus,the art of calligraphy has become a metaphoric tool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary purpose of this study is to show that works of art (painting,music, sculpture, literature, etc.) can be used as means of guidance forthe designers, and triggering creativity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the other hand, the secondarypurpose is to prove the mettle art of calligraphy as a tool of guidance forthe freshmen and a trigger for creativity in the context of basic designdiscipline.During the fall semesters in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, the main themefor Basic Design Course at Karadeniz Technical University, Departmentof Architecture was chosen and determined as “Anatolian Arts”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus,the art of calligraphy has become a metaphoric tool.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to show that works of art (painting,music, sculpture, literature, etc.) can be used as means of guidance forthe designers, and triggering creativity. On the other hand, the secondarypurpose is to prove the mettle art of calligraphy as a tool of guidance forthe freshmen and a trigger for creativity in the context of basic designdiscipline.During the fall semesters in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, the main themefor Basic Design Course at Karadeniz Technical University, Departmentof Architecture was chosen and determined as “Anatolian Arts”. Withinthe context of the chosen theme, it was tried to reveal the potentialrelationship between “Anatolian Arts and Basic Design Elements andPrinciples”, moreover, the usability of Anatolian Arts as a tool of design. In this aim, from the whole semester, only one sample of practice hasbeen chosen to put forward the hypothesis of relationship between artsand education increases the creativity in terms of basic design elements(dot, line, direction, shape/form, distance, size, proportion), for thisstudy; a sampling through “basic design elements” with the “art ofcalligraphy” has been made. Within this hypothesis, the “art ofcalligraphy” and its characters were introduced briefly and thischaracteristic situation was questioned in the given design problems bymeans of “basic design elements”.In short, this study, which exemplifies the state of calligraphy as ametaphoric tool in design education, focuses on the partnerships ofcalligraphy and basic design elements. Design elements such as “dot”,“line”, “direction”, “shape/form”, “distance”, “size” and “proportion” arereinterpreted in the context of the characteristics of calligraphy. Thus,the art of calligraphy has become a metaphoric tool.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEŞGEN, A., KULOĞLU, N., ÖZTÜRK, S. D. (2022). Calligraphy as a Metaphoric Tool for Basic Design Courses. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 187–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/538303

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Arnheim, R. (1974).
  2. Art and Visual Perception, The New Vision. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
  3. Arnheim, R. (1997).
  4. Visual Thinking, Univesity of California Press.
  5. Artun, A, & Aliçavuşoğlu, E. (2009). Bauhaus: Modernleşmenin Tasarımı, Türkiye’de Mimarlık, Sanat ve Tasarım Eğitimi ve Bauhaus, İletişim Yayınları,
  6. İstanbul.
  7. Aydınlı, S. (2015).
  8. Tasarım Eğitiminde Yapılandırıcı, Paradigma: “Öğrenmeyi Öğrenme”, Tasarım+Kuram, 20, 1-18.
  9. Bell, S. (1996). Elements of Visual Design in the Landscape, E&FN SPON London. Besgen, A., Kuloglu, N. & Fathalizadehalemdari, S. (2015). Teaching/Learning Strategies Through Art: Art and Basic Design Education, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 428-432.
  10. Boydaş, N. (1994). Ta’lik Yazıya Plâstik Değer Açısından Bir Yaklaşım, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları: 2532, İstanbul.
  11. Cam, F. (2013). Modern-Postmodern Sanat Algısı Bağlamında Hat Sanatı Calligraphy in the Context of Modern-Postmodern Art Perception, Art-E: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Hakemli Dergisi, Mayıs-Haziran 11, 1308-2698.
  12. Conrad, U. (1991). 20. Yüzyıl Mimarisinde Program ve Manifestolar, Walter Gropius, “Weimar’daki Staatliches Bauhaus’un Programı”, Translation: Dr. Sevinç Yavuz, Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı, (37). Çubukcu, E. & Dündar, Ş. G. (2007). Can creativity be taught? An empirical study on benefits of visual analogy in basic design education, ITU A|Z, 4 (2), 67-80.
  13. Denel, B. (1981).
  14. Temel Tasarım ve Yaratıcılık, Ankara: ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Basım İşliği. Durling, D. (2003). Horse or cart? Designer creativity and personality, Design self understanding. The aesthetic of technology, European Academy of Design Conference, Barcelona, 1-11.
  15. Durling, D., Cross, N. & Johnson, J. (1996). Personality and learning preferences of students in design and design-related disciplines, Edge Ltd. and The Open University, IDATER 96 Loughborough University. Durmuş Öztürk, S., Beşgen A. & Kuloğlu, N. (2018). Rethinking Basic Design Education: Deconstruction of Anatolian Carpets, Art-Sanat, 9, 463-478.
  16. Erdoğdu, G. P. S. (2016). Temel Tasarım Eğitimi: Bir ders planı örneği, Basic Design Education: A course outline proposal, Planlama, 26(1). Eryayar, E. (2011). Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımında Gestalt Teorisi Uygulaması, Journal of World of Turks ZfWT, 3(2), 125-133.
  17. Goldschmidt, G. (1994). On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture, Design Studies, 15 (2), 122-240.
  18. Guberman, S. (2017). Gestalt Theory Rearranged: Back to Wer