Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of Seismic Behaviour and Safety of a Masonry Heritage

Pages
592–607
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The evaluation ofthese results is promising in terms of seismic safety of these heritageswith minimized intervention on the structure without compromising theauthentic view and function.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey is a highly seismic country where numerous major earthquakeshave devastated or damaged the existing historic structures owing tothere is a large number of historical structures, mostly religious ones likemosques, and churches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The minarets are essential parts of mosques andthere are many of these historic structures across the country whichwere built since Seljuq Empire started to rule the Anatolia and followedby Ottomans.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The evaluation ofthese results is promising in terms of seismic safety of these heritageswith minimized intervention on the structure without compromising theauthentic view and function.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Turkey is a highly seismic country where numerous major earthquakeshave devastated or damaged the existing historic structures owing tothere is a large number of historical structures, mostly religious ones likemosques, and churches. The minarets are essential parts of mosques andthere are many of these historic structures across the country whichwere built since Seljuq Empire started to rule the Anatolia and followedby Ottomans. As Turkey located in a highly active seismic zone, thepossible damage of the minarets, the tallest part of the mosques, shouldbe examined and the safety measures, in terms of seismic retrofit, shouldbe considered. It is engineering communities’ responsibility to satisfythe longevity of these existing heritages by the help of science andknowledge.To realize this objective, a case study is planned which addresses theproblem of seismic capacity of a stone masonry minaret as a part of thearchitectural heritage in Istanbul, and a typical historical mosque ischosen. Mathematical model of the minaret is prepared in order toobtain possible deformation profile, lateral displacements, free vibrationmodes and most likely failure modes under seismic excitation by usingresponse spectrum analysis. Most recent developments in the in-situ testing of structures andcomputational procedures for structural analysis have made reaching tothe important results about the behaviour of the old masonry structures.The numerical results have shown that the greatest damage accumulatednear the shoe region and the lower part of the shaft. The evaluation ofthese results is promising in terms of seismic safety of these heritageswith minimized intervention on the structure without compromising theauthentic view and function.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRK, A. M. (2022). Assessment of Seismic Behaviour and Safety of a Masonry Heritage. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 592–607. https://ajindex.com/articles/538295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahunbay, Z. (1988). Mimar Sinan Yapılarında Kullanılan Yapım Teknikleri ve Malzeme. In, Mimarbaşı Kocasinan Yaşadığı Çağ ve Eserleri I, (pp. 531-538),
  2. Istanbul, Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.
  3. ANSYS. (2018). “Academic Research Mechanical”, Release 17.2.0, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Arıoğlu, N., Arıoğlu, E. (1997). “Mimar Sinan’ın Sectiği Taş: Küfeki ve Çekme Dayanımı”, Paper presented at the 14. Türkiye İnşaat Mühendisliği Teknik Kongresi, İzmir.
  4. Turkey. Arıoğlu, E., Arıoğlu, N. (1999). “Mimar Sinan’ın Taşıyıcı Olarak Kullandığı Küfeki Taşının Mühendislik Gizemi”, Paper presented at the Mimar Sinan Dönemi Yapı Etkinlikleri Semineri, İstanbul,
  5. Turkey. Batur, A. (1994). 1894 Yazı Pek Heyecanlı Geçmişti, Bir Depremin Yüzyıl Dönümü“. İstanbul Dergisi, 10, 25-32.
  6. Erguvanlı, K., Ahunbay, Z. (1989). Mimar Sinan'ın Istanbul’daki Eserlerinde Kullandığı Taşlarin Mühendislik Jeolojisi ve Mimari Ozellikleri. Mühendislik Jeolojisi Bülteni, 11, 109- 114. Eurocode 8 (1998). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Lourenco, P.B. (2006). Recommendations for Restoration of Ancient Buildings and the Survival of a Masonry Chimney. Construction and Building Materials, 20, 239-251.
  7. Lourenco, P.B., Oliveira, D.V., Roca, P., Orduna, A. (2005). Dry Joint Stone Masonry Walls Subjected to In-Plane Combined Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(11), 1665- 1673. Micelli, F., Cascardi, A. (2020) Structural assessment and seismic analysis of a 14th century masonry tower. Engineering Failure Analysis, 107, 104198. NEHRP (2003). Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA 450- 1/2003
  8. Edition.
  9. Oğuzmert, M. (2002).
  10. Yığma Minarelerin Dinamik Davranışı, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi,
  11. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
  12. Oliveira, C.S., Cakti, E., Stengel, D., Branco, M. (2011). Minaret behaviour under earthquake loading: The case of historical Istanbul. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(1), 19-39. Tarihi Yapılar İçin Deprem Risklerinin Yönetimi Kılavuzu (2017).
  13. Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü, Istanbul. TBDY 2019 (2109). Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, İçişleri Bakanlığı, Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  14. Turk, A.M., Cosgun, C. (2012). Seismic Behaviour and Retrofit of Historic Masonry Minaret, Gradevinar, 64(1), 39-45.
  15. Turk, A.M. (2013). Seismic Response Analysis of Masonry Minaret and Possible Strengthening by Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) Materials. Advances in Mater