SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Transformation of the Space in the context of Neoliberal Urbanization: The Case of Izmir New City Centre, Turkey

Özgün TUTAR
Eylem BAL
Pages
428–459
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, the aim of this study is decipher neoliberalurbanization-oriented process and variables of neoliberal urbanization process in NCC and to reveal the neoliberal spatial transformation in theregion on the basis of reproduction of the space.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The neoliberalism process of Turkey, the intersection point of the GlobalSouth and the Global North, which dates back to the 1980s whenneoliberalism became a dominant paradigm in the world, began torapidly transform urban space in the 2000s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In İzmir, the thirdlargest metropolitan city of Turkey, the area which is declared New CityCentre (NCC) in 2003 has become one of the important application areasof neoliberal urbanization policies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, the aim of this study is decipher neoliberalurbanization-oriented process and variables of neoliberal urbanization process in NCC and to reveal the neoliberal spatial transformation in theregion on the basis of reproduction of the space.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The neoliberalism process of Turkey, the intersection point of the GlobalSouth and the Global North, which dates back to the 1980s whenneoliberalism became a dominant paradigm in the world, began torapidly transform urban space in the 2000s. With the transformation ofcapital out of İstanbul, the main application area of neoliberalurbanization in Turkey, the other metropolitan cities of Turkey havebeen involved in the process of neoliberalization. In İzmir, the thirdlargest metropolitan city of Turkey, the area which is declared New CityCentre (NCC) in 2003 has become one of the important application areasof neoliberal urbanization policies. The neoliberalization process of NCCis carried out through large-scale urban projects which are one of theimportant implementation tools of neoliberal urbanization policies andintervene in the economic, social and cultural areas as well as urbanspace. In this context, the aim of this study is decipher neoliberalurbanization-oriented process and variables of neoliberal urbanization process in NCC and to reveal the neoliberal spatial transformation in theregion on the basis of reproduction of the space.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUTAR, Ö., BAL, E. (2022). Transformation of the Space in the context of Neoliberal Urbanization: The Case of Izmir New City Centre, Turkey. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 428–459. https://ajindex.com/articles/538291

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Andersen, B., & Røe, P. G. (2017). The social context and politics of large scale urban architecture: Investigating the design of Barcode, Oslo. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24 (3), 304-317.
  2. Bal, E. (2011). Türkiye’de 2000 sonrası neoliberal politikalar çerçevesinde imar mevzuatındaki değişimler ve yeni kentleşme pratikleri: İstanbul örneği [Changes about development law and new urbanization practices in the frame of neoliberal polıtics in Turkey after 2000’s: The case study of Istanbul] (Doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
  3. Bal, E. & Akyol Altun, D. (2016). İzmir'de neoliberal kentleşme eğilimleri kapsamında lüks konut üretiminde yeni yaklaşımlar: Folkart konut projeleri [New approaches to luxury housing construction in İzmir in the context of neoliberal urbanization: Folkart housing projects]. Planlama Dergisi, 26 (1), 65-80. Bénit-Graffou, C., Didier, S. & Peyroux, E. (2012). Circulation of security models in Southern African cities: Between neoliberal encroachment and local power dynamics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36 (5), 877-889.
  4. Borsuk, I. & Eroğlu, E. (2019). Displacement and asset transformation from inner-city squatter settlement into peripheral mass housing. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1-14.
  5. Brenner, N. & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 34 (3), 349-379.
  6. Burgers, J. & Van Der Waal, J. (2008). Globalizing urban economies and social inequality: An empirical assessment. The case of Amsterdam and Rotterdam. In P. Ache, H. T. Andersen, T. Maloutas, M. Raco, & T. Taşan-Kok (Ed.) Cities between competitiveness and cohesion discourses, realities and ımplementation (79-98) New York: Springer Science+Business Media. Ellis, R. (2012). “A world class city of your own!”: Civic governmentality in Chennai. India. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 44 (4), 1143-1160.
  7. Enright, T. E. (2014). Illuminating the Path to Grand Pari(s): Architecture and urban transformation in an era of neoliberalization. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 46 (2), 382-403.
  8. Eraydın, A. (2011). Changing ıstanbul city region dynamics: Reregulations to challenge the consequences of uneven development and inequality. European Planning Studies, 19 (5), 813-837.
  9. Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42 (5), 1-25.
  10. Gomez, P. (2019). The birth o