Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Persistence, Inertia, Adaptation and Life Cycle: Applying Urban Morphological Ideas to Conceptualise Sustainable City-Centre Change

Pages
73–94
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The rapid recycling ofsome structures, after only a couple of decades, may be veryunsustainable – impracticable and unaffordable – in an urban context.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consideration of the speed and scale of change of urban forms has a longhistory in urban morphological thought.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Buildings and forms that persistin the urban landscape through inertia or, more positively, deliberatedecisions to retain them create character and – a more recent argument– contribute to sustainability not least in their embedded energy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The rapid recycling ofsome structures, after only a couple of decades, may be veryunsustainable – impracticable and unaffordable – in an urban context.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Consideration of the speed and scale of change of urban forms has a longhistory in urban morphological thought. Buildings and forms that persistin the urban landscape through inertia or, more positively, deliberatedecisions to retain them create character and – a more recent argument– contribute to sustainability not least in their embedded energy. Thispaper explores issues of the persistence and adaptation of some urbanforms, focusing on the central business district of Birmingham, UK. Muchof this is now protected as a conservation area, and some of its formshave persisted for centuries. Yet there have been periods of rapidchange, and we examine the extent of change following Second WorldWar bomb damage. This allows discussion of the dynamics of change andthe agents and agencies responsible for producing new urban forms or retaining existing ones; and this informs exploration of the potentialcontribution of longevity of form to sustainability. The rapid recycling ofsome structures, after only a couple of decades, may be veryunsustainable – impracticable and unaffordable – in an urban context.

🔖

Cite This Article

LARKHAM, P. J., ADAMS, D. (2022). Persistence, Inertia, Adaptation and Life Cycle: Applying Urban Morphological Ideas to Conceptualise Sustainable City-Centre Change. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 73–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/538290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Adams, D. (2011). Everyday experiences of the modern city: remembering the post‐war reconstruction of Birmingham. Planning Perspectives, 26(2), 237-260.
  2. Adams, D. & Larkham, P. J. (2019). The Everyday Experiences of Reconstruction and Regeneration: From Vision to Reality in Birmingham and Coventry: Routledge. Aïtcin, P. C. & Minders, S. (2011). Sustainability of Concrete. Abdingdon, Spon. Allen, C. & Blandy, S. (2004). Fables of the reconstruction: Innerurban regeneration, city centre living and the reinvention of urban space. Paper presented at the international conference of the International Sociological Association, Research Committee. Barber, A. & Hall, S. (2008). Birmingham: whose urban renaissance? Regeneration as a response to economic restructuring. Policy Studies, 29(3), 281-292.
  3. Batty, M. (2007). The creative destruction of cities. Environment & Planning B, 24, 2-5. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) (2008). Bullring ‘UK’s ugliest building. BBC News 14 October. http://bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7668994.stm.(accessed.6/9/ 2019).
  4. Benton-Short, L., Keeley, M. & Rowland, J. (2019). Green infrastructure, green space, and sustainable urbanism: geography’s important role. Urban Geography, 40(3), 330- 351. Birmingham City Council (1989). The Highbury Initiative City Challenge Symposium. Birmingham: City Council. Birmingham City Council (2017) Birmingham Plan 2031. Birmingham: City Council. Bryson, J. (2003) Reshaping and reinvesnting the city of Birmingham: planning for enterprise and the information society. In A. MacLaren (ed.) Making Space: Property Development and Urban Planning London: Arnold. Calder, B. (2016). Raw concrete: the beauty of brutalism: Random House. Clawley, A. (2011). John Madin. RIBA Publications. Clawley, A. (2015). Library Story. Birmingham: author. Clement, A. (2018). Brutalism: post-war British architecture: The Crowood Press.
  5. Conzen, M.R.G. (1962). The plan analysis of an English city centre. In K. Norborg (ed.) Proceedings of the I.G.U. Symposium in Urban Geography, Lund, 1960. Lund Studies in Geography. Lund: Royal University of Lund, Department of Geography. Dale, P. (2009). Experts cast doubt on Birmingham Central Library ‘concrete cancer’ claims. Birmingham Post 16 June. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/ (accessed 6/9/2019).
  6. Edensor, T. (2019). The haunting presence of commemorative statues. Ephemera, 19(1), 53-76.
  7. Flynn, N. & Taylor, A. (1986). Inside the rust belt: an analysis of the decline of the West Midlands economy. 1: In