However, italso emphasizes the need for a participatory and holistic urbandesign process for the Hanlar District of Bursa including theadaptive re-use strategies for the inns to sustain the district.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, many studies have been carried out to support communityengagement in planning and urban design processes in Turkey.This study which tries to bring together community engagementand urban design within the framework of sustainability ofcultural heritage sites is a part of a scientific research projectwhich aims to create a participative model to develop an urbandesign guideline for the Hanlar District, a historical commercialdistrict including many inns in the city centre of Bursa, in Turkey.While a series of community engagement techniques wereexperimented during the project process, the aim of this article isto examine the potential benefits of using educational charrettesas a kind of design charrette to establish a participatory andcompetitive platform including public, private, voluntary actorsand local people in urban design process of heritage sites.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Itoverviews the charrette use in developing adaptive re-use andurban design schemes for the inns and their surrounding publicspaces which are not actively used in the Hanlar District which has been a UNESCO world heritage site since 2014, and thenhighlights the proposals that were developed in terms of theobjectives of the Bursa and Cumalikizik Management Plan.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, italso emphasizes the need for a participatory and holistic urbandesign process for the Hanlar District of Bursa including theadaptive re-use strategies for the inns to sustain the district.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Today, many studies have been carried out to support communityengagement in planning and urban design processes in Turkey.This study which tries to bring together community engagementand urban design within the framework of sustainability ofcultural heritage sites is a part of a scientific research projectwhich aims to create a participative model to develop an urbandesign guideline for the Hanlar District, a historical commercialdistrict including many inns in the city centre of Bursa, in Turkey.While a series of community engagement techniques wereexperimented during the project process, the aim of this article isto examine the potential benefits of using educational charrettesas a kind of design charrette to establish a participatory andcompetitive platform including public, private, voluntary actorsand local people in urban design process of heritage sites. Itoverviews the charrette use in developing adaptive re-use andurban design schemes for the inns and their surrounding publicspaces which are not actively used in the Hanlar District which has been a UNESCO world heritage site since 2014, and thenhighlights the proposals that were developed in terms of theobjectives of the Bursa and Cumalikizik Management Plan. Finally,this study presents the usability, suitability and practicability ofeducational charrettes as a community engagement way in theurban design process of the heritage sites while enabling differentactors to create new visions to sustain heritage sites. However, italso emphasizes the need for a participatory and holistic urbandesign process for the Hanlar District of Bursa including theadaptive re-use strategies for the inns to sustain the district.
🔖
Cite This Article
ÇAHANTİMUR, A., ATANUR, G., POLAT, S., YILDIZ, H. Ö. T. (2022). A Quest for Sustainability of Cultural Heritage Sites: The Hanlar District of Bursa, Turkey. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 1–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/538286
Aksoy, A., Enlil, Z. (2012). Kültürel miras yönetiminde çağdaş yaklaşımlar. In A. Aksoy, D. Ünsal (Ed.), Kültürel Miras Yönetimi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Web-Ofset. pp. 3-29.
Boccardi, G., Scott, L. (2014). Developing a proposal for the integration of a sustainable development perspective within the processes of the world heritage convention. Accessed 30 November 2018. http://whc.unesco.org/document/128769
Brown, J., Hay- Edie, T. (2014). Engaging local communities in stewardship of world heritage. Paris: UNDP. Accessed 30 November 2018. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/002 3/002303/230372e.pdf Bursa Site Management Unit. (2013). Bursa (Hanlar District & Sultan Complexes) and Cumalikizik management plan (2013-2018). Bursa: Metropolitan Municipality of Bursa. Carmona, M. (2017). The formal and informal tools of design governance. Journal of Urban Design, 22(1): 1-36. Department of the Environment and Heritage. (2004). Adaptive reuse. Accessed 30 November 2018. 6http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resourc es/3845f27a-ad2c-4d40-8827-18c643c7adcd/files/adap tive-reuse.pdf Douglas, J. (2006). Building adaptation. London: Spon Press.
EPA. (2018). Public participation guide: charrettes. Accessed 30 November 2018. https://www.epa.gov/internationalcooperation/ public-participation-guide-charrettes ICCROM. (2005). Definition of cultural heritage. Accessed 30 November 2018. http://cif.icomos.org/pdf_docs/Docume nts%20on%20line/Heritage%20definitions.pdf ICOMOS. (1999). Burra charter. Accessed 30 November 2018. http://australia.icomos.org/wpcontent/ uploads/BURRA_CHARTER.pdf ICOMOS. (2005). Threats to world heritage sites 1994-2004: An Analysis. Accessed 30 November 2018. https://www.ico mos.org/world_heritage/Analysis%20of%20Threats%2 01994-2004%20final.pdf ICOMOS. (2016). Cultural heritage, the UN sustainable development goals, and the new urban agenda. Accessed 30 November 2018. http://www.usicomos.org/wp-con te nt/uploads/2016/05/Final-Concept-Note.pdf INVOLVE. (2005). People and participation. London: Beacon Press.