SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements

İlknur ACAR ATA
Mehmet Emin BAŞAR
Pages
251–285
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analyzes for the selected buildings were conductedaccording to the determinants of architectural tourism potential(architectural and environmental factors, targeted tourist).The dataobtained from the analysis were synthesized architectural tourism withcultural, ethnic, religious and ancestral tourism and suggestions weredeveloped.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The population exchange between Turkey and Greece was decided in1923 as a result of Lausanne Treaty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By this decision, non-Muslim Greeksliving in Turkey and Muslim Turks living in Greece were mandatorymutual migration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analyzes for the selected buildings were conductedaccording to the determinants of architectural tourism potential(architectural and environmental factors, targeted tourist).The dataobtained from the analysis were synthesized architectural tourism withcultural, ethnic, religious and ancestral tourism and suggestions weredeveloped.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The population exchange between Turkey and Greece was decided in1923 as a result of Lausanne Treaty. By this decision, non-Muslim Greeksliving in Turkey and Muslim Turks living in Greece were mandatorymutual migration. The immigrants left their architectural heritage thatwas built with cultural, ethnic and faith values in the settlements wherethey were born and grew. Many religious structures (churches,monasteries, chapels), civil buildings (housing, education, health, trade,accommodation, social), technical and economic structures (mills, ovens,bridges, fountain) remained after Greek-Turkish population exchange invarious regions of Turkey.Besides to being the witness to history each of the original heritagestructures that reflect Greek immigrants’ economic, social conditions,cultural wealth and belief have architectural tourism potentials. Withinthe scope of the study, the architectural tourism potentials were evaluated by selecting the Uluagac Greek School, Fertek Church, HancerliLaundry and Church Fountain as a sample among the different buildinggroups located in the Uluagac, Fertek and Hancerli settlements locatedin Nigde/Turkey. The analyzes for the selected buildings were conductedaccording to the determinants of architectural tourism potential(architectural and environmental factors, targeted tourist).The dataobtained from the analysis were synthesized architectural tourism withcultural, ethnic, religious and ancestral tourism and suggestions weredeveloped.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATA, İ. A., BAŞAR, M. E. (2022). The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 251–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/538283

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ağanoğlu, H. Y. (2001). Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyete Balkanların Makus Talihi, Göç. In. İstanbul:
  2. Kum Saati Yay. Arı, K. (2008). Büyük Mübadele Türkiye’ye Zorunlu Göç 1923- 1925,. In (pp. 166). İstanbul:
  3. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
  4. Ata, İ. A. (2017). Mübadelenin mimari tanıkları: Niğde Yeşilburç (Tenei) Köyü Fatma-İbrahim Oral Konağı örneği. (Master Thesis), Selcuk University, Brown, B. B., & Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In Place attachment (pp. 279-304):
  5. Springer. Cetin, M. (2015). Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: a case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(6), 490–495.
  6. Chen, C. F., & Chen, F. S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management, 31(1), 29–35.
  7. Chhabra, D., Healy, R., & Sills, E. (2003). Staged authenticity and heritage tourism. Annals of tourism research, 30(3), 702- 719. Cohen, E. (1972). Towards a Sociology of International Tourism. Social Research, 39(1), 164-182.
  8. Cohen, E. (1974). Who is a Tourist? A Conceptual Clarification. Sociological Review, 22(4), 527–555.
  9. Dinçer, F. (2008). Fertek tarihine ekistik bir yaklaşım. Retrieved from http://blog.milliyet.com.tr/fertek-tarihine-ekistikbir- yaklasim/Blog/?BlogNo=92403: [01.12.2018]
  10. Du Cros, H. (2001). A new model to assist in planning for sustainable cultural heritage tourism. International journal of tourism research, 3(2), 165-170.
  11. Dümcke, C., & Gnedovsky, M. (2013). The social and economic value of cultural heritage: literature review. EENC paper, 1-114.
  12. E. Lowyck, Langenhove, L. V., & Bollaert, L. (1992). Typologies of tourist roles. In s (eds) Choice and Demand in Tourism (pp. 13–32). In P. J. a. B. Thoma (Ed.), Choice and Demand in Tourism (pp. 13-32). London: Mansell Publishing. Ebadi, M. (2014). Typologies of the visitors at Khaled Nabi shrine, Iran: tourists or pilgrims? International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(3), 310-321.
  13. Ekiz, M. (2015). Niğde İli ve İlçeleri Arkeolojik Yüzey Araştırması 2015
  14. Raporu. Retrieved from Enlil, Z., Dinçer, İ., Evren, Y., & Seçkin, E. (2011). İstanbul’da Kültür Turizmi İçin Yenilikçi Stratejiler, İstanbul:. İstanbul İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  15. Erkal, N. (2007). Gösteri Olarak Mimarlık: Turizmin Güncel Mimarlığa Etkileri Üzerine. Mimarlık Dergisi, 336 Eryaman, M. (2013