Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Social Creativity and Place (Re)production: Tarbiat Pedestrian Route in Tabriz, Iran

Pages
630–651
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, according to the results, incentives of social creativity in the (re)production of the place are closely associated with the active role of the users and their enthusiasm to participate in design processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PurposeThis article explores the role of creativity and its aspects in urban environments by tackling the issue of place (re)production based on a particular interpretation of creativity as an “everyday” and “social” phenomenon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on the proposed conceptual model, a thematic content analysis was carried out on the qualitative data collected in 2019 from the Tarbiat pedestrian route using Atlas.ti.06 software with regard to the dimensions of creative (re)production of place.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, according to the results, incentives of social creativity in the (re)production of the place are closely associated with the active role of the users and their enthusiasm to participate in design processes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PurposeThis article explores the role of creativity and its aspects in urban environments by tackling the issue of place (re)production based on a particular interpretation of creativity as an “everyday” and “social” phenomenon. The paper gives theoretical evidence for the relationship between place (re)production and social aspects of creativity. Design/Methodology/ApproachThe study benefited from a review on both subjects of social creativity and place (re)production to find out their relationship and how they can be expressed in an urban space design process. Tarbiat pedestrian route in Tabriz, Iran was chosen as a case study. Based on the proposed conceptual model, a thematic content analysis was carried out on the qualitative data collected in 2019 from the Tarbiat pedestrian route using Atlas.ti.06 software with regard to the dimensions of creative (re)production of place. FindingsThe main achievement of this article is development of an original conceptual framework for applying 1) social creativity as an effective factor in (re)production of place, and 2) the findings in a practicalcontext. Research Limitations/ImplicationsThe main limitations of this research include the time constraints of accomplishing a qualitative research, the limited numberof previous studies on the topic and the lack of samples qualifying as a case study. Social/Practical Implications This article is based on the concept of creativity as a social phenomenon that involves ordinary, unplanned, and collective creative acts of individuals,as well as urban place formation as a socio-spatial process, in which social context plays an important role. Also, according to the results, incentives of social creativity in the (re)production of the place are closely associated with the active role of the users and their enthusiasm to participate in design processes. Originality/Value This research focuses on an urban regeneration initiative to show how an appropriate context for mobilizing actors, bringing them together and shaping a more creative urban space is achieved by conscious level of place (re)production through inspired and gradual expert-oriented interventions, and the unconscious level of (re)production through the everyday shared experiences of people.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aminzadeh, B., Rezabeigisani, R. (2022). Social Creativity and Place (Re)production: Tarbiat Pedestrian Route in Tabriz, Iran. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 630–651. https://ajindex.com/articles/538271

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akin, Ö. (1978). How do architects design? In J-C Latombe (Eds.).Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition in Computer-Aided Design(pp. 65-104).
  2. North Holland. Abbaszadeh, SH. and Tamari, S. (2013). Investigating the contributing factors on improving the spatial quality of pedestrian routes in order to increase the level of social interactions. Case study; Tabriz and Valiasr pedestrian routes, Journal of Urban Studies, 18, 1-10 (In Persian). Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
  3. Barlow, C. A. (2000). Deliberate insight in team creativity, Journal of Creative Behaviour, 34(2): 101-117.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press.
  5. Burns, T. and Corte, U. and Machado des Johansson, N. (2015). The sociology of creativity: PART II: Applications: The socio-cultural contexts and conditions of the production of novelty, Human Systems Management. 34, 263-286.
  6. Carmona, M. (2015). Re-theorizing contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative,Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(4), 373-405.
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity — Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, HarperCollins Publishers,
  8. New York, NY. Douglas, G. C. (2014). Do-it-yourself urban design: The social practice of informal “improvement” through unauthorized Alteration, City & Community, 13, 5-25.
  9. Drake, G. (2003). This place gives me space’: place and creativity in the creative industries, Geo forum, 34(4), 511-524.
  10. Esmaili Sangari, H. (2014). Strategies for the revival of historical contexts as the identical urban values. Case Study: The Historical Tarbiat Rout in Tabriz, Journal of Urban Management. 13(37), 35-56 (In Persian). Fischer, G. (2014).
  11. Learning, Social Creativity, and Cultures of Participation, University of Colorado Boulder. Fischer, G. and Shipman, F. (2011). Collaborative Design Rationale and Social Creativity in Cultures of Participation, Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments (Special Issue on Creativity and Rationale in Software Design), 7(2), 164–187.
  12. Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond Binary Choices: Integrating Individual and Social Creativity, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS) Special Issue on Computer Support for Creativity (E.A. Edm