Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Shaping of Flexibility in Urban Renewal Legal Sources in Turkey and Its Effect on Practices

Pages
652–671
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The originality of this study is to examine the shaping of flexibility in legal sources related to urban renewal, and reflections into the practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PurposeDiscussions in planning systems of different countries under the influence of structural changes at the macro level are concentrated around flexibility and certainty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since 2000, Turkey have triggered a shift in the planning system which is defined as regulatory in theory, towards a more flexible system in practice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The originality of this study is to examine the shaping of flexibility in legal sources related to urban renewal, and reflections into the practices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PurposeDiscussions in planning systems of different countries under the influence of structural changes at the macro level are concentrated around flexibility and certainty. Since 2000, Turkey have triggered a shift in the planning system which is defined as regulatory in theory, towards a more flexible system in practice. This flexible system can be also seen in urban renewal practices. The aim of the article is to discuss the flexibility shaped by the legal sources with examples of urban renewal in Turkey.Design/Methodology/ApproachAs methodology, in the study, firstly, international and national literature on flexibility in planning systems was investigated. Afterwards, shaping flexibility in planning systems is focused on three categories; (1) spatial planning, (2) property rights, and (3) discretionary power. Legal sources related to urban renewal areas, and their practices are examined under three categories based on findings of some examples in literature.FindingsThe findings demonstrate that the increase in the degree of flexibility directly affects the spatial planning, property rights, and using of the discretionary power: Firstly, the scope and power of spatial plans are eliminated. Secondly, the property right, which is protected by the constitution, is ignored. Thirdly, since the limits of discretionary power are not clear, the outcomes of practices cannot be controlled either. Research Limitations/ImplicationsThe study based on findings of some examples in literature. In the study, no specific area study has been conducted. Social/Practical Implications As a result of these study, laws and regulations related to urban renewal can be rearranged in terms of property rights, discretion power and spatial planning. Thus, more livable cities can be created with the participation of people in urban renewal practices and the public benefit of planning.Originality/Value There are quite limited studies focus on shaping of flexibility, and its effects in urban renewal. The originality of this study is to examine the shaping of flexibility in legal sources related to urban renewal, and reflections into the practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tarakçı, S., Türk, Ş. Ş. (2022). Shaping of Flexibility in Urban Renewal Legal Sources in Turkey and Its Effect on Practices. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 652–671. https://ajindex.com/articles/538270

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Bektaş, Y. (2014). Bir Kentleşme Stratejisi Olarak Yasanın Kentsel Mekanı Dönüştürmedeki Etkisi: Ankara Örneği (The Impact of Law on Transforming Urban Space as an Urbanization Strategy: The Case of Ankara), Planlama Dergisi (The Planning Journal), 3(24), 157-172 (in Turkish). BIB Urbanization Forum (2009). Kentleşme Şurası (Cilt 1) (Urbanization Council, Volume 1). Ankara, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement (in Turkish). Biggar, J. & Siemiatycki, M. (2020) Tracing Discretion in Planning and Land-Use Outcomes: Perspectives from Toronto, Canada, Journal of Planning Education and Research 1–17, DOI: 10.1177/0739456X20904427 Booth, P. (1996) Controlling development Certainty and discretion in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong, Taylor and Francis, London. Booth, P. (2003) Planning by Consent: The Origins and Nature of British Development Control, London, Routledge. Buitelaar, E. & Sorel, N. (2010) Between the rule of law and the quest for control: Legal certainty in the Dutch,Land Use Policy (27), 983-989.
  2. Catney, P. & Henneberry, J. (2012) (Not) Exercising Discretion: Environmental Planning and the Politics of Blame-Avoidance,Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 13, No. 4, 549–568
  3. Ergun, N. (2006). Gentrification Kuramlarının Istanbul’da Uygulanabilirliği (The Applicability of Gentrification Theories to Istanbul). D. Behar, & T. İslam (Eds). Istanbul’da Soylulaștırma Eski Kentin Yeni Sahipleri (Gentrification in Istanbul: The New Owners of the Old City). Istanbul,Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları (in Turkish). Ersoy, M. (2000). İmar Planlarının Kademelenmesi ve Farklı Ölçeklerdeki Planlar Arasındaki İlişki (The Staging of Zoning Plans and Relationships between Plans of Different Scales). M. Ersoy & Ç. Keskinok (Eds), Mekan Planlama ve Yargı Denetimi (Space Planning and Judicial Control) Ankara, Yargı Yayınevi (in Turkish). Gervan, A., Demir, H. & Yılmaz, A. (2013) Kentsel dönüşüm projelerinde mülkiyet kazanımlarının ekonomik analizinin Ayazma Kentsel Dönüşüm Projesi örneğinde incelenmesi (Economic analysis for change of ownership in urban renewal projects based on Ayazma renewal project case), HKMO 14. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel veTeknik Kurultayı, Ankara (in Turkish). Gur, S. & Turk, S. S. (2014). 6306 Sayılı Kanunla Yeniden Ortaya Çıkan Bina Ölçeğinde Kentsel Yenileme Pratiği: Bağcılar İlçesi Örneği (The Practice of Urban Renewal on a Building Level Reemerging with Law No. 6306: The Case of the Bağcılar District), 38. Dünya Şehircilik Günü Kolokyumu, Istanbul