Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Housing.Flexibility: A Framework for a Quantitative Evaluation Method due to Turkish Designers

Pages
545–566
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover this study creates a more clear definition of the terminology of flexibilityfromthepointofviewofTurkishsocietyandprovidesbasicguidelinesfortheimplementation of flexible housing design.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose Flexibility became an important factor affecting the quality of housing projects in Turkey nowadays due to the requirement of the permanent mobile/dynamic lifestyle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Moreover, this study has created a clearer definition of the terminology of flexibility from the point of view of Turkish society and provided basic guidelines for the implementation of flexible housing design.Research Limitations/ImplicationsQuantifying a complex design parameter as flexibilityusing the Value engineering method requires the division and analyse the opinion of expert separately from the end users’ opinion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover this study creates a more clear definition of the terminology of flexibilityfromthepointofviewofTurkishsocietyandprovidesbasicguidelinesfortheimplementation of flexible housing design.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose Flexibility became an important factor affecting the quality of housing projects in Turkey nowadays due to the requirement of the permanent mobile/dynamic lifestyle. Thus, a responsive housing design should be developed to allow modifications that respond to the changing demands of the tenants through time. Although it is a major debate in housing design for many years in western countries; the Turkish perspective of housing ignores the adjustment to changing needs and compensates it with big-sized dwellings, causing space consumption. This contradicts with the Turkish roots emerged from the nomadic lifestyle with the tent. Housing flexible design is an essential requirement in Turkish culture historically. This study aims to develop a quantitative evaluation method, in order to assess the level of flexibility, defining the indicators and the hierarchy to measure it.Design/Methodology/ApproachIn order to establish a Flexibility Assessment System, Value Engineering method is applied, a tool used in decision-making process to choose the ideal solutions. Additionally, this system will contribute to the improvement of the “architectural quality of housing” in Turkey, since now it is evaluated and commercialized merely by the calculations of the surface areas. FindingsDespite that most of the experts have a different understanding and evaluation of flexibility, they concurred on some indicators to measure and evaluate flexibility. Moreover, this study has created a clearer definition of the terminology of flexibility from the point of view of Turkish society and provided basic guidelines for the implementation of flexible housing design.Research Limitations/ImplicationsQuantifying a complex design parameter as flexibilityusing the Value engineering method requires the division and analyse the opinion of expert separately from the end users’ opinion. Originality/ValueThis study is the first study defining the criteria of flexibility, and their quantitative evaluation from Turkish cultural view. Moreover this study creates a more clear definition of the terminology of flexibilityfromthepointofviewofTurkishsocietyandprovidesbasicguidelinesfortheimplementation of flexible housing design.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ismail, S. H., Hatipoğlu, H. K. (2022). Housing.Flexibility: A Framework for a Quantitative Evaluation Method due to Turkish Designers. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 545–566. https://ajindex.com/articles/538263

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akalin, A., & Yildirim, K. (2010). User interventions in Turkish mass housing. Open House International ·, 35(1), 57–65.
  2. Altaş, N., & Özsoy, A. (1998). Spatial adaptability and flexibility as parameters of user satisfaction for quality housing. Building and Environment, 33(5), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1323(97)00050-4
  3. Altman, I., & Wohlwill, J. F. (2012). Human Behavior and Environment. Springer Science & Business Media. Beisi, J. (1995). Adaptable housing or adaptable people? Experience in Switzerland gives a new answer to the questions of housing adaptability. Architecture & Comportement/Architecture & Behaviour, 11(2), 139–162.
  4. CABE. (2004). Housing Futures 2024. Built Environment, 11. Connaughton, J. N., & Green, S. D. (1996). Value Management in Construction: A Client’s Guide(Construction Industry Research & Information Association (CIRIA) (ed.)). (CIRIA). Cristiana Cellucci, & Michele Di Sivo. (2015). The Flexible Housing: Criteria and Strategies for Implementation of the Flexibility. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(7), 845–852. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2015.07.011
  5. Darke, J. (1982). The Design of Public Housing: Architects’ Intentions and Users’ Reactions. University of Sheffield. De Paris, S. R., & Lopes, C. N. L. (2018). Housing flexibility problem: Review of recent limitations and solutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.11.004
  6. Dirisamer, R., Kuzmich, F., Voss, W., & Weber, J. P. (1976). Project Dwelling of Tomorrow. In Hollabruun, Austria’,. Industrialisation Forum, 7(1), 11–16.
  7. Domenig, G. (1991). Wohnprojekt “Neufeldweg” in Graz/A. Deutsche Bauzeitschrift, 39(4), 492–502.
  8. Estaji, H. (2017). A Review of Flexibility and Adaptability in Housing Design. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture, 4(2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.14621/tna.20170204
  9. Forty, A. (2002). Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture Adrian Forty. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 61(1), 187. https://doi.org/10.2307/991831
  10. Fricke, E., & Schulz, A. P. (2005). Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle. Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20039
  11. Groak, S. (2002). The idea of building: thought and action in the design and production of buildings. Taylor & Francis. Habraken, N. J. (2019). Supports: an alternative to mass housing. Routledge. Hasgül,E., & Özsoy, A. (2016). Konut Tasarımı