Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

The Evaluation of the Perceptibility and Accessibility: The Case of Gaziantep

Pages
480–497
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason, it is extremely important for people to have easy access to parks for socialization purposes.Originality/ValueItisconsideredthatexaminingaccessibilitywiththespacesyntaxmethod,unlikeotherconventional methods, adds an important value to the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PurposeThe study focuses on accessibility to green spaces.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the study aims to determine the accessibility of green areas in metric and topological terms, and to examine and discuss their social and functional contributions.Design/Methodology/ApproachThe study was designed in 5 stages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, it is extremely important for people to have easy access to parks for socialization purposes.Originality/ValueItisconsideredthatexaminingaccessibilitywiththespacesyntaxmethod,unlikeotherconventional methods, adds an important value to the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PurposeThe study focuses on accessibility to green spaces. In this context, the study aims to determine the accessibility of green areas in metric and topological terms, and to examine and discuss their social and functional contributions.Design/Methodology/ApproachThe study was designed in 5 stages. In the first phase of the study, a convex area map was formed within the limit of accessibility based on the literature research. In the second phase,the axial map was created. In the third phase, the integration map was used to determine the visual perceptibility of the green areas within the study area. The Depthmap software was used in analysis and creation of the maps. In the fourth phase, all findings obtained are explained and discussed with detailed graphics and maps. In the last phase of the study, some suggestions regarding the study area and general spatial planning approach were developed in the light of scientific principles in order to ensure urban green areas' contribution to the city and residentsFindingsAll analysis results were evaluated in a holistic manner and the spatial relationship between residential areas and green areas in the study area was found to be weak and the perception of green areas was moderate.Research Limitations/ImplicationsFurther studies should be conducted to evaluate the accessibility of several parks of different sizes with other various methods. In the study, accessibility values were obtained with the Space syntax method. These values can be compared to each other with other analysis methods. Practical ImplicationsThis analysis will enable issues such as park locations in city plans, their size, and intervals to be more professionally handled. Thus, living space conditions and indirectly cities will be improved. As a result, urban life quality will flourish.Social ImplicationsUrban green spaces are important components of the city in that they contribute positively to urban residents in terms of environmental, social, economic etc. aspects. For this reason, it is extremely important for people to have easy access to parks for socialization purposes.Originality/ValueItisconsideredthatexaminingaccessibilitywiththespacesyntaxmethod,unlikeotherconventional methods, adds an important value to the study.

🔖

Cite This Article

Günaydın, A. S., Yücekaya, M. (2022). The Evaluation of the Perceptibility and Accessibility: The Case of Gaziantep. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 480–497. https://ajindex.com/articles/538259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Afacan, Y. (2015). Yaşanabilir Kentsel Mekanlar İçin Erişilebilirliğin Önemi: Çukurambar Kentsel Dönüşüm Örneği. Dosya 36: Mekanlarda Erişilebilirlik, Kullanılabilirlik ve Yaşanabilirlik, 3, 20–25.
  2. Alalouch, C., Aspinall, P., & Smith, H. (2009). On locational preferences for privacy in hospital wards. Facilities, 27(3/4), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770910933125
  3. Altunkasa, M. F. (2004). Adana’nın Kentsel Gelişim Süreci ve Yeşil Alanlar. Adana Kent Konseyi Çevre Çalışma Grubu Bireysel Raporu. Asami, Y., Kubat, A. S., & Istek, C. (2001). Characterization of the street networks in the traditional Turkish urban form. 21. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2718
  4. Baran, P. K., Rodríguez, D. A., & Khattak, A. J. (2008). Space Syntax and Walking in a New Urbanist and Suburban Neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701803498
  5. Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29(2), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
  6. Dalton, N. (2001). Fractional Configurational Analysis And a solution to the Manhattan problem. Proceedings., 14. Daniels, B., Zaunbrecher, B. S.,Paas, B., Ottermanns, R., Ziefle, M., & Roß-Nickoll, M. (2018). Assessment of urban green space structures and their quality from a multidimensional perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 615, 1364–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.167 de la Barrera, F., Reyes-Paecke, S., Harris, J., Bascuñán, D., & Farías, J. M. (2016). People’s perception influences on the use of green spaces in socio-economically differentiated neighborhoods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.007
  7. Department of the Environment. (1994). Vital and viable town centres: Meeting the challenge, Department of the Environment—Publication Index | NBS. HMSO. https://www.thenbs.com/PublicationIndex/documents/details?Pub=DOE&DocID=257855
  8. Ekkel, E. D., & de Vries, S. (2017). Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008
  9. Fan, P., Xu, L., Yue, W., & Chen, J. (2017). Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.007
  10. Fladd, S. G. (2017). Social syntax: An approach to spatial modification through the reworking of space syntax for arch