Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Use of Augmented Reality in the Preservation of Architectural Heritage: Case of the Aqueduct Kuru Kopru (Kayseri, Turkey)

Pages
110–130
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The developed methodology can be easily implemented and puts forward the use of low-cost materials.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose The architectural preservation embeds all the activities dealing with the sustainability of the built heritage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/Methodology/ApproachThis work refers to restoration and heritage visualization charters, combines Computer-Aided Design (CAD), photogrammetry survey method, and advanced texturing techniques to acquire and model virtual reconstructions of the Aqueduct Kuru Kopru from the Roman-Byzantine period to the year 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The developed methodology can be easily implemented and puts forward the use of low-cost materials.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose The architectural preservation embeds all the activities dealing with the sustainability of the built heritage. The representation and diffusion of heritage take a core place in that process. This study aims at the diffusion of the Aqueduct Kuru Kopru towards a broad public audience, establishment of the awareness that Augmented Reality (AR) methods can be used for the evaluation and presentation of the semi-collapsed structures and serving as a model for the representation and diffusion of virtual reconstructions of Architectural Heritage (AH). Design/Methodology/ApproachThis work refers to restoration and heritage visualization charters, combines Computer-Aided Design (CAD), photogrammetry survey method, and advanced texturing techniques to acquire and model virtual reconstructions of the Aqueduct Kuru Kopru from the Roman-Byzantine period to the year 2017. The paper also describes the frameworks for the implementation of a non-immersive and an immersive AR application to visualize modelled reconstructions. The method used consists ofthreemainstages:modellingofthevirtualreconstructions,texturingofmodels,anddevelopment of AR applications.FindingsThisstudyestablishes ARand culturalheritagedigitizationtechniquesasefficienttoolstorepresent and diffuse the Aqueduct Kuru Kopru. It engages a broad public audience in better comprehension and assessment of the aqueduct. Research Limitations/ImplicationsThe fact that the research is based on a single case study is a limitation for its generalisation. However, the case examined provides a basis for future work that may validate its findings indifferent contexts.Originality/Value The paper proposes the rediscovering of long-abandoned aqueduct Kuru Kopru by learning its spatio-temporal evolution through AR. The developed methodology can be easily implemented and puts forward the use of low-cost materials.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çoruh, L., Kozlu, H., Oke, A. (2022). Use of Augmented Reality in the Preservation of Architectural Heritage: Case of the Aqueduct Kuru Kopru (Kayseri, Turkey). ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 110–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/538253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ahunbay, Z. (2014). Tarihi Çevre koruma ve restorasyon. Yapi Endustri Merkezi Yayinlari.Autodesk. (2018, December 11). UVW Map Modifier. Autodesk Knowledge Network. https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/3ds-max/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2019/ENU/3DSMax-Modifiers/files/GUID-78327298-4741-470C-848D-4C3618B18FCA-htm.html
  2. Azuma. (1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.
  3. Bekele, M. kassahun, Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., & Malinverni, S. (2018).
  4. A Survey of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality for Cultural Heritage. 11(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3145534
  5. Berk, M. G. (2018). Proposal for an Automated Form Finder System to Deduce the Authentic Morphology of Siirt Cas Houses. VR Technologies in Cultural Heritage, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-05819-7
  6. Binan, D., Töre, T., & Kut, S. (2013). Mimari Koruma Alanında Artırılmış Gerçekliğin Kullanımı ve Değerlendirmesi Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Örneği (Technical Report No. 2013–12; p. 43). Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2732.5521
  7. Canciani, M., Conigliaro, E., Del Grasso, M., Papalini, P., & Saccone, M. (2016). 3D Survey And Augmented Reality For Cultural Heritage. The Case Study of Aurelian Wall At Castra Praetoria In Rome. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI, 931–937. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-931-2016
  8. Carmigniani, J., & Furht, B. (2011). Augmented Reality: An Overview. In Augmented Reality: An Overview(pp. 3–46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_1 de la Fuente Prieto, J., Castano-Perea, E., & Arroyo, F. (2017). Augmented Reality in Architecture: Rebuilding Archaeological Heritage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W3, 311–315. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-311-2017
  9. Denard, H. (2009). A new introduction to the London Charter. Londoncharter for the Computer-Based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage. http://www.londoncharter.org/fileadmin/templates/main/docs/london_charter_2_1_en.pdf
  10. Di Mascio, D., Chiuini, M., Fillwalk, J., & Pauwels, P. (2016). 3D Digital Reconstructions of Lost Buildings. Digital Heritage, 2, 511–520.
  11. El-Hakim, S. F., Beraldin, J. A., Picard, M., & Godin, G. (2004). Detailed 3D reconstruction of large-scale heritage sites with integrated techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics