Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

An Awareness Experience by Empathic Design Method inArchitectural Design Education

Pages
242–260
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Originality/ValueTo increase the prevalence of accessibility and the participation of the disabled in society, the empathic design method can be foreseen to be a key method in other studies in architectural education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose In architectural education, the most important outcome aimed for architect candidates to acquire is the ability to show empathy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study focuses on designing for users who have special physical needs while addressing the concept of establishing empathy together with universal designing principles in architectural education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Originality/ValueTo increase the prevalence of accessibility and the participation of the disabled in society, the empathic design method can be foreseen to be a key method in other studies in architectural education.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose In architectural education, the most important outcome aimed for architect candidates to acquire is the ability to show empathy. This study focuses on designing for users who have special physical needs while addressing the concept of establishing empathy together with universal designing principles in architectural education. Design/Methodology/ApproachThe empathic design method has been selected as the method of this study. As part of the study, it is aimed for students to offer a design solution in which they would fictionalize a universal design concept together with the empathic design which grounds on universal design principles. FindingsAs a result of the study, it was observed that when given a key method during the design process, students couldapproach the design with different points of view and interpret the datum with different approaches.Research Limitations/ImplicationsThis study, as part of the Çukurova University Department of Architecture Interior Design class, students were asked to implement interior design projects using the empathic design method with user groups of their choice in terms of characteristic and age range following the empathic design process. Social/Practical Implications It is to develop the awareness of architecture students in the creation process and such studies with different approaches and models to develop their perspectives. Originality/ValueTo increase the prevalence of accessibility and the participation of the disabled in society, the empathic design method can be foreseen to be a key method in other studies in architectural education.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şenyiğit, Ö., Yılmaz, N. (2022). An Awareness Experience by Empathic Design Method inArchitectural Design Education. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 242–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/538244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Audi, R. (Ed.). (1999). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy, (4TH ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  2. Banerji H. (2016). An attempt to explore components of empathic architecture in hospitals: a study of indian hospitals. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2016.1150220
  3. Bringa, O. R. (2007). Making universal design work in zoning and regional planning: A Scandinavian approach. Nasar, J. L. & Evans-Cowley, J. (Ed.). Universal design and visitability: from accessibility to zoning. (p.98). The John Glenn School of Public Affairs. Christophersen, J. (Ed.). (2002). Universal design: 17 ways of thinking and teaching. Husbanken. Curadale, R. (2012). Design methods 1: 200 ways to apply design thinking. Design Community College Inc. E. Mediastika, C. (2016). Understanding empathic architecture. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2016.1165385
  4. El, Ö., Peker, Ö., Bozan, Ö., Berk, H., & Koşay, C. (2007). General characteristics of cerebral palsy patients. DEÜ Tip Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 75-80. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/53424 Ersoy E. G. & Köşger F. (2016). Empathy: definition and its importance. Osmangazi Journal of Medicine, 38 (2), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.33993 Frascara J. (Ed.). (2002). Design and the social sciences: making connections. Taylor & Francis.Goldsmith, S. (1997). Designing for the disabled: The new paradigm. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080572802
  5. Gümüş, D. Ç. (2009).
  6. İngiltere, Japonya ve Türkiye’de özürlülük ve erişilebilirlik. Mimarlık Dergisi, 347, 36. http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=361&RecID=2065
  7. Güngör, C. (2007). Alışveriş merkezlerinin engelliler için erişebilirlik standartları kapsamında irdelenmesi (Doktora Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  8. Hacıhasanoğlu, I. (2003). Evrensel Tasarım. Tasarım Kuram Dergisi, 2(3), 93-101. https://jag.journalagent.com/tasarimkuram/pdfs/DTJ_2_3_93_101.pdf
  9. Ickes W. (1997) (Ed.). Empathic Accuracy. Guilford Press. ILO, (2011). Disability in the workplace: employers’ organizations and business networks. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_167204.pdf Iwarsson S., & Ståhl A. (2003). Accessibility, usability and universal design: positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(2), 57-66. https