Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Exploring The Perceived Landscape with The Local People: The Experience of Community Mapping in Orduzu District (Malatya/Turkey)

Pages
506–537
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This framework can be used as a foundation for a planning process in touch with “real life” and “users”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose The main purpose of the paper is to define historical landscapes through locals’ perspectives and employs community mapping as a tool for defining and transferring perceived landscape elements Design/Methodology/Approach The method used in this research consists of various stages, such as determining the boundaries of the study area, determining the goals and objectives of the community mapping, evaluation of the mapping process in the examined toolkits, and the community mapping process design specific to the study area according to the toolkits reviewed in the literature, and the outputs and observations obtained from the maps.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings As a result of the community mapping study conducted with men and women separately, items under the themes of agriculture (past and present), hydrology, tangible cultural heritage, intangible cultural heritage, built environment, connectivity, flora and fauna were identified.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This framework can be used as a foundation for a planning process in touch with “real life” and “users”.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose The main purpose of the paper is to define historical landscapes through locals’ perspectives and employs community mapping as a tool for defining and transferring perceived landscape elements Design/Methodology/Approach The method used in this research consists of various stages, such as determining the boundaries of the study area, determining the goals and objectives of the community mapping, evaluation of the mapping process in the examined toolkits, and the community mapping process design specific to the study area according to the toolkits reviewed in the literature, and the outputs and observations obtained from the maps. Findings As a result of the community mapping study conducted with men and women separately, items under the themes of agriculture (past and present), hydrology, tangible cultural heritage, intangible cultural heritage, built environment, connectivity, flora and fauna were identified. In this study, beyond the recognized physiographic features of the district, were discovered its “unseen” components due to the statements of locals and the analysis of the perceptual data they provided. Were acquired verbal information and point data about some archaeological sites that are not mentioned in any records or literature, as they remain undiscovered. Research Limitations/Implications This study bridged an establishing a new link with sustainable spatial planning by assessing perceptions of local people to the environment they live in. However, this study has limitations in the verbal and linear expressions of the groups participating in the mapping process.In the pre-mapping process needs to be supported by local government and non-governmental organizations for more participants. Social/Practical Implications it is suggested that the use of this methods such as spatial data production (on historical differences in landscape) within the mainframe of the participant planning approach and community mapping (to ensure collective wellbeing by creating healthy, sustainable spaces) and the inclusion of these methods in spatial planning stages will prove significantly useful. Originality/Value This study provides a framework for integrating different perspectives to better recognise and planning and manage the landscape character. This framework can be used as a foundation for a planning process in touch with “real life” and “users”.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ay, B. H., Tuna, A. (2022). Exploring The Perceived Landscape with The Local People: The Experience of Community Mapping in Orduzu District (Malatya/Turkey). ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 506–537. https://ajindex.com/articles/538232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Antrop, M. (2005). From Holistic Landscape Synthesis to Transdisciplinary Landscape Management. In: B. Tress, G. Tress, G. Fry and P. Opdam, eds. From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application, Springer Press:
  2. Netherlands. Armstrong, H. (2008).
  3. Community Mapping, In: Zoë Sofoulis, In: Armstrong, H., Bounds, M., Lopes, A. & Andrews, T. (2008). Out & About in Penrith: Universal Design and Cultural Context: Accessibility, Diversity and Recreational space in Penrith, unpublished report for Penrith City Council and UW Brown, G. (2006). Mapping Landscape Values and Development Preferences: A Method for Tourism and Residential Development Planning, International Journal of Tourism Research 8: 101–113.
  4. Butler, A., & Berglund, U. (2014). Landscape Character Assessment as an Approach to Understanding Public Interests within the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 39 (3): 219- 236. Cabeça, S., Gonçalves, A. R., Marques, J. F., & Tavares, M. (2019). Mapping Intangibilities in Creative Tourism Territories Through Tangible Objects: A Methodological Approach for Developing Creative Tourism Offers. Tourism & Management Studies, 15(SI):42-49.
  5. Cosgrove, D., & Daniels, S. (1988). Introduction: iconography of landscape. In: Cosgrove, D. and Daniels, S. eds. The iconography of landscape. Bath Press,
  6. Bath. Council of Europe. (2000). Text of the European Landscape Convention. [online] [accessed 4 October 2010]. Available at:. Demir, S., & Demirel, Ö. (2016). Korunan Havzalarda Peyzaj Değişimi ve Peyzaj Karakter Analizi ile Peyzaj Planlama Yaklaşımı: Meryemana Vadisi Örneği, Trabzon, Journal of Arts and Design, 6 (13):155-174.
  7. Doyle, W.E. (2014). Review of Perceptions of the Prehistoric in Anglo- Saxon England: Religion, Ritual and Rulership in the Landscape. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 24(1): 1-3.
  8. Di Nocera, G.M. (2006, April 3-8). Settlements, population and landscape on the Upper Euphrates between V and II millennium BC. Results of the Archaeological Survey Project 2003-2005 in the Malatya Plain. [Paper presentation]. 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. Ersoy, M. (2008).
  9. Kentsel Planlama Kuramları, İmge Kitabevi,
  10. Ankara.
  11. Fairclough, G. (2014). Landscape Character Assessment and Historical Landscape Characterisation: Conflicting, Competing, Complementary-The (Un) Necessary Evils of Disciplinary Seperation, The Future