Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

The Urban and Architectural Characteristics of Voyvoda Street fromPast toPresent

Pages
1–24
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The street and the historical buildings that define the axial character and the image of the street by its architectural components, and their functional transformation have been analyzed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose VoyvodaStreet in Galata district of Istanbul originated centuries ago at the inner walls of the medieval city and was one of the most significant of its era, which has preserved its unique character and urban identity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although the historical characters of some buildings have been changed by new additions, the original silhouette of the nineteenth century is still dominant.Research Limitations/ImplicationsVisual materials and resources of some buildings were available in detail, while for some of them, the materials were limited.Originality/ValueThe previous studies concentrated on urban, and architectural aspects of Galata district as a whole, whereas this study focused on the urban identity of Voyvoda Street.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The street and the historical buildings that define the axial character and the image of the street by its architectural components, and their functional transformation have been analyzed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose VoyvodaStreet in Galata district of Istanbul originated centuries ago at the inner walls of the medieval city and was one of the most significant of its era, which has preserved its unique character and urban identity. In the nineteenth century, it became an important financial axis for the city. This study aims to understand the factors which determined the axial character of Voyvoda Street and its urban identity. The street, which is under the influence of new dynamics is examined in relation to spatial and functional transformation.Design/Methodology/ApproachThe analysis was developed by two essential components: the street and the buildings that define the character of the street by its architectural components, and their functional transformation since thenineteenth century. The axial character of the street has been evaluated due to selected criteria. The data is based on literature review, the survey of historical maps, visual materials such as photographs and gravure prints, and on-site observations.FindingsThe street has been shapedand transformed by social, political, and economic developments, external and internal migrations, the influence of modernist architectural movements, urban reforms, Western innovations in transportation, and technical developments. Voyvoda Street’s strong character as an axis is determined by its historical buildings, which are attached to each other continuously that form a wall defining the boundaries of the street. It is one of the essential pedestrian connections and functions as a path. Since most of the buildings lost their original functions, following the re-use for various needs, the service and cultural industries have become dominant. Although the historical characters of some buildings have been changed by new additions, the original silhouette of the nineteenth century is still dominant.Research Limitations/ImplicationsVisual materials and resources of some buildings were available in detail, while for some of them, the materials were limited.Originality/ValueThe previous studies concentrated on urban, and architectural aspects of Galata district as a whole, whereas this study focused on the urban identity of Voyvoda Street. The street and the historical buildings that define the axial character and the image of the street by its architectural components, and their functional transformation have been analyzed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Makaklı, E. S., Seçmen, S. (2022). The Urban and Architectural Characteristics of Voyvoda Street fromPast toPresent. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 1–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/538218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akin, G. (2011).20. Yüzyıl Başında İstanbul:
  2. Toplumsal ve Mekansal Farklılaşma, Osmanlı Başkentinden Küreselleşen İstanbul’a: Mimarlık ve Kent 1910-2010.
  3. İstanbul, Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi. Akin, N. (1998).19.Yüzyılın İkinci Yarısında Galata ve Pera.Literatür Yayıncılık. Akpınar, İ. (2011).Osmanlı Başkentinden Küreselleşen İstanbul’a: Mimarlık ve Kent 1910-2010.Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi. Alpay, S.(2007).Voyvoda (Bankalar) Caddesi’nin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Hezaren Han, Master of ScienceThesis, Yildiz Technical University, Institute of Science. Altan, B. (2007). ‘Arşiv Belgeleri Işığında Hezaren Han’ın Yapısal Çözümlemesi, Master of ScienceThesis, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science. Ashworth, G. J. & Tunbridge, J. E. (1990).TheTourist-Historic City.Belhaven. Ashworth, G. J. &Larkham, P. J. (1994).Building a New Heritage: Tourism, Culture and Identity in the New Europe. London, Routledge. Bandarin, F. and Van Oers, R. (2012).The Historic Urban Landscape.HobokenWiley. Bandarin, F. and Van Oers, R. (2015).Introduction Urban Conservation and the End of Planning, In F, Bandarin, and Oers, V (Eds.). Reconnecting the City. Wiley, UK. Batur, A. (1996).DünyaKenti İstanbul.Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  4. Batur, A. (2001).Galata andPera, A ShortHistory: Urban Development Architecture and Today.ARI: The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, 55(1), 1-10.
  5. Bilgin, I. (2010).İstanbul 1910-2010,
  6. Kent, Yapılı Çevre ve Mimarlık Sergisi Kataloğu. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  7. Bullen, P. A., &Love, P.E. D. (2010). The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Viewsfromthefield. Cities,27, 215–224.
  8. Can, C. (1999). Tanzimat and Architecture.In N.Akın (Eds.) 7 Centuries of Ottoman Architecture: A Supra-NationalHeritage. İstanbul, Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Publications. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003). The Dimensions of Urban Design. In M. Carmona et al. (Eds.) Public Places –Urban Spaces.Oxford, Architectural Press.
  9. Celik, Z. (1998).19. Yüzyılda Osmanlı BaşkentiDeğişenIstanbul. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları. Dokmeci,V.,Altunbas,U., &Yazgi,B. (2007).Revitalisation of the main street of a distinguishedoldneighbourhood in Istanbul.European Planning Studies, 15(1),153–166.
  10. Eldem, E. (1999). Bankalar Caddesi: Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Voyvoda Caddesi.Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi. Tarih Vakfı. Eldem, E. (2000).İstanbul: İmparatorluk Payitahtından Periferleşmiş bir Başkente. In E. Eldem; D. Goff