Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Turkey Experience in Urban Transformation

Pages
966–990
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Originality/Value This study is important with the development of spatial strategies with the participation and cooperation activities of the residents and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the basis of neighbourhoods in urban transformation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study focuses on the current situation and problems of urban transformation practices in Turkey, with respect to space, society, and policy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A number of field studies and surveys were conducted in the study area in Konya city in Turkey, with regards to the unity of space, society, and politics and were developed spatial strategies that ensure such unity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Originality/Value This study is important with the development of spatial strategies with the participation and cooperation activities of the residents and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the basis of neighbourhoods in urban transformation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study focuses on the current situation and problems of urban transformation practices in Turkey, with respect to space, society, and policy. A number of field studies and surveys were conducted in the study area in Konya city in Turkey, with regards to the unity of space, society, and politics and were developed spatial strategies that ensure such unity. Design/Methodology/Approach The study consisted of two stages. In the first stage, the literature on the need for urban transformation in Turkey was reviewed based on experiences relating to space (land fragmentation, property rights, informalities housing), society (the coordination and participation processes), and politics (current legislation, actors and their roles, horizontal and vertical coordination, public interest, planning strategy, policy learning). In the second stage, a number of field studies (the status of the buildings, the building types, the land use status, the status of historical and cultural structures, the land to building ratio, the land fragmentation and cadastral status and surveys) were utilized within the scope of our analysis. The survey questions consisted of the problems and expectations of inhabitants and NGOs with respect to spatial, political and social aspects of the study area. Findings Based on the results of the current situation analysis and field survey, spatial strategies that provide the unity of space, society, and politics were developed for the study area. Research Limitations/Implications With respect to actors and their roles, this study focuses on two groups as representatives of the social structure. The other groups also should be involved directly or indirectly because of the multifactor structure of the urban transformation processes. Social/Practical Implications Identifying the need, processes and problems related to urban transformation, based on the unity of space, society, and politics could have positive effects on sustainable projects. Originality/Value This study is important with the development of spatial strategies with the participation and cooperation activities of the residents and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the basis of neighbourhoods in urban transformation.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZDAĞ, A., İNAM, Ş. (2022). Turkey Experience in Urban Transformation. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 966–990. https://ajindex.com/articles/538215

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Afacan, Y. (2015). Resident satisfaction for sustainable urban regeneration. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer, 168(4), 220–234.
  2. Akın, O. & Özdemir, D. (2010). A comparative assessment of the European Union and Turkey in the Housing production process and TOKI applications, In Dilek Özdemir, eds. Policy, Legislation and Implementation in Urban Transformation: European Experience, Istanbul Applications, Nobel Broadcast Distribution, pp. 285-316,
  3. Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish). Altunışık, R. Coşku, R. Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2010).
  4. Research methods in social sciences, SPSS applied, Sakarya Publishing. (in Turkish). Arnstein, S.R. (1969).
  5. A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
  6. Ay, D. (2019). Diverging community responses to state-led urban renewal in the context of recentralization of planning authority: An analysis of three urban renewal projects in Turkey. Habitat International, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102028
  7. Batuman, B. (2013). City profile: Ankara, Cities, 31, 578-590.
  8. Bektaş, Y. (2014). Bir Kentleşme Stratejisi Olarak Yasanın Kentsel Mekanı Dönüştürmedeki Etkisi: Ankara Örneği. Planning, 24(3), 157–172.
  9. Bostan, M. Erdoğanaras, F. & Tamer, N.G. (2010). Manufacturing industry replacement process and features in the metropolitan area in Ankara, METU JFA, 27(1), 81-102.
  10. Bozdağ, A. (2015). Analysis of urban regeneration applications in consensus land use planning approach, Thesis (Phd), The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science S.U. Konya (in Turkish). Cahantimur, A. I., Öztürk, R. B., & Öztürk, A. C. (2010). Securing land for urban transformation through sustainable brownfield regeneration – the case of Eskişehir, Turkey. Environment and Urbanization (IIED), 22(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247809362641
  11. Dündar, Ö. (2001). Models of Urban Transformation Informal Housing in Ankara, Cities, 18 (6), 391–401.
  12. Edgar, B. & Taylor, J. (2008).
  13. Housing, Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, Chapter 8. Edt. Peter Roberts, Hugh Sykes. British Urban Regeneration Association. Eğercioğlu, Y., Yakıcı, N., & Ertan, T. (2016). Urban Decline and Revitalization Project in Izmir-Tire Historical City Center. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 330–337.
  14. Ercan, M.A. (2011). Challenges and conflicts in achieving sustainable communities in historic neighbourhoods of Istanbul, Habitat International, 35, 295-306.
  15. Eyüboğlu, E., Kubat, A.S.