Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Architectural Distinctiveness of the 15th Century Ottoman Tombs in Skopje: Learning from the Recent Archeological Excavation

Pages
220–243
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The crypted tombs found in Skopje are discussed for the first time in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Grave structures are architectural works reflecting the cultural accumulation, continuity and political power of societies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article aims to evaluate the impact of crypted tombs (mezar odalı türbe), originating from the Kurgan culture of the Turks, in shaping the urban morphology of Skopje, as a Turkish city during the 15th century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The crypted tombs found in Skopje are discussed for the first time in this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Grave structures are architectural works reflecting the cultural accumulation, continuity and political power of societies. In addition, graveyards or necropolises and grave structures themselves, have an important contribution in shaping urban forms of cities. This article aims to evaluate the impact of crypted tombs (mezar odalı türbe), originating from the Kurgan culture of the Turks, in shaping the urban morphology of Skopje, as a Turkish city during the 15th century. Crypted tombs, which are very few in the Balkan geography, are a type of tombs mostly built during the Seljuk and Early Ottoman periods. The rich architectural forms and local aesthetic qualities of tombs have attracted a lot of research attention. As a result, tomb typology was defined by classifying the tombs according to the architectural peculiarities such as plan, volume shape, roofing system and applied materials. For the purpose of this paper, available sources were examined and the typology for six crypted tombs of Skopje was prepared. In addition, the archive documents describing the immediate surroundings of the tombs were examined, and the confusion of information about the tombs was clarified. After the definitions and typology of the tombs were determined, the locations of these tombs in the city of Skopje were defined, confirming the urban development approach applied since the Early Ottoman period. This paper relies on the results of Archaeological Excavation and Research Project of the Pasha Yiğit Bey Tomb, which was done under the auspices of the Şarık TARA, in Skopje, during which three crypted tombs were found beside the previously known ones. In this study, the tombs unearthed as a result of archaeological excavations are defined in the context of the 15th century Early Ottoman city structure. The crypted tombs found in Skopje are discussed for the first time in this study.

🔖

Cite This Article

IBRAHİMGİL, A., KUDUMOVİC, L. (2022). Architectural Distinctiveness of the 15th Century Ottoman Tombs in Skopje: Learning from the Recent Archeological Excavation. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 220–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/538207

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aktepe, M. M. (1953). XIV. ve XV. Asırlarda Rumeli'nin Türkler Tarafından İskânına Dair. Türkiyat Mecmuası, 299-312.
  2. Altuğ, U. (2011). Erken On Beşinci Asır Osmanlı Balkanlar’ında Tımar Sisteminin Tatbikinde Coğrafi Koşulların Tesiri. ADAM Akademi(1), 29-44.
  3. Apak, A. (2002). Osmanlı Devleti'nin Kuruluş Döneminde Bursalı Bir Vezir Ailesi: Kara Timurtaşoğulları. Marife Dini Araştırmalar, Bahar / 2(1), 181-196.
  4. Arık, M. O. (1967). Erken Devir Anadolu Türk Mimarisinde Turbe Biçimleri. Anadolu, XI, 57-100.
  5. Asım, S. (2004). Üsküp Tarihi ve Civarı. İstanbul: Rumeli Araştırmaları Merkezi Yayınları.
  6. Ayverdi, E. H. (1981). Avrupa'da Osmanlı Mimari Eserleri (Vol. III). İstanbul:
  7. İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti. Bogoyeviç, L. K. (2011). Üsküp'te Osmanlı Mimari Eserleri. İstanbul:
  8. ENKA. Bozdoğan, M., Çakır, H., & Özkan, S. (2006). Edirne Turbelerinin Mekânsal Analizi. Trakya University Journal of Science, 7(1), 23-31.
  9. Curcic, S. (2010). Architecture in the Balkans. Princeton: Princeton University. Çelebi, E. (1979). Seyahatname. (H. Šabanović, Ed.) Sarajevo, Ministerstvo za Kultura. Çoroviç, V. (1940). Historija Bosne. Druştveni i Istoriski Spisi, CXXIX(53). Deroko, A. (1971). Средњове, Кобни Град Скопје. Београд: Српска Академија Наука и Уметности. Dişli, G. (2014). Muslim tombs in Crimea: a typological analysis. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 182-197.
  10. Efendi, H. S. (1999). Tacüt-Tevarih. (İ. Parmaksızoğlu, Ed.) Ankara:
  11. KTB. Elezoviç, G. (1933). Turski Spomenici u Skoplju. GSND(1). Elezoviç, G. (1939). Kralj Kizi. Bratstvo(XX), 48-64.
  12. Feilden, B. M., & Jokilehto, J. (1993). Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites. Rome: ICCROM Filipoviç, E. O. (2011). Grob Bosanske Princeze Katerine u Skoplju. Posebna Izdanja, II, 1-4.
  13. Filipoviç, N. (1965). Osvrt na Polozaj Bosanskog Seljstva u Prvoj Deceniji Uspostavljanja Osmanske Vlasti u Bosni (Vol. 3). Sarajevo: Radovi Filozofskog Fakulteta u Sarajevu. Hammer, J. v. (1979). Historija Osmanskog Carstva (Vol. I). Zagreb. ICOMOS, (1964). International Charter For The Conservation And Restoration Of Monuments And Sites (The Venice Charter 1964), IInd International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, Article 14. ICOMOS, (1990). Charter for The Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage, International Committee for the Management of Archaeological Heritage (ICAHM) and 9th General Assembly, Lausanne. İbrahimgil, A. (2018). Makedonya Üsküp'ün Tarihi Kent Dokusunun İncelenm e