Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Examination of the Diversity in Rural Architecture in Kırklareli Through Factors

Pages
299–324
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, documentation of authentic characteristics of the rural houses and sites considering environmental features will provide a base for the sustainability of original rural houses and areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aims to document the settlement, spatial, constructional, and cultural characteristics of Kırklareli rural area to reveal the variations of the region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result, the natural environment, geography, climate, and culture all had a role in the formation of rural settlements and houses. (1) Topographical features influenced daily living and agricultural productivity, resulting in changes in settlement structures. (2) The differences in plan characteristics of rural dwellings were mostly influenced by regional climate conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, documentation of authentic characteristics of the rural houses and sites considering environmental features will provide a base for the sustainability of original rural houses and areas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study aims to document the settlement, spatial, constructional, and cultural characteristics of Kırklareli rural area to reveal the variations of the region. In addition, the region is a hybrid location with elements from both the Black Sea and inner Anatolia. So, the characteristics of the region are compared with the Black Sea and inner Anatolia. The method of the study is composed of two phases, first, the effect of environmental features such as natural environment, topography, climate, and the economic situation on settlement and plan and constructional characteristics and material usage of the houses in Kırklareli were documented. Second, the Thrace region's rural characteristics were compared to those of the Black Sea and inner Anatolia. As a result, the natural environment, geography, climate, and culture all had a role in the formation of rural settlements and houses. (1) Topographical features influenced daily living and agricultural productivity, resulting in changes in settlement structures. (2) The differences in plan characteristics of rural dwellings were mostly influenced by regional climate conditions. The presence, form, and size of common places and open spaces var ied based on climate conditions. (3) Local materials used in house construction were influenced by landforms and the natural environment. It has been observed that house construction strategies have altered as a result of the most widely accessible material from the surroundings. (4) Even though there were physical variances between houses due to topographical changes in the area, Turkish people's nomadic culture and Islamic beliefs provided certain similar elements in the houses, such as introversion and privacy. Thrace Rural area contains different settlement, spatial and constructional characteristics due to the differences in its geography. Many rural homes have been abandoned, and there is a risk of becoming lost. Therefore, documentation of authentic characteristics of the rural houses and sites considering environmental features will provide a base for the sustainability of original rural houses and areas.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇER, F., YÜKSEK, İ. (2022). Examination of the Diversity in Rural Architecture in Kırklareli Through Factors. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 299–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/538202

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akış T., İnceköse Ü., Tunçoku S S. & Arslan Avar, A. (2013). İzmir Kırsal Alan Konutları. Mimarlık, 370. Akyüz-Levi, E. & Taşçı, B. (2017). Research of Rural Architecture in Aegean Region: Villages of Bayındır. Megaron, 12(3), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2017.12499. Alcindor M. & Coq-Huelva, D. (2020). Refurbishment, vernacular architecture and invented traditions: the case of the Empordanet (Catalonia). International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(7), 684-699. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2019.1678054 Aran, K. (2000). Barınaktan Öte: Anadolu Kır Yapıları. Ege Yayınları.
  2. Başoğlan Avşar, Ö. (2016). Muğla - Yerkesik Kırsalı O�rneğinde Kırsal Mimarinin Geleceğinin Tartışılması. Ege Mimarlık, 92, 14-19.
  3. Batur, A. & G ür Ş, Ö. (2005). Doğu Karadeniz’de Kırsal Mimari. Milli Reasürans T.A. Ş. Batur, A. (2005). Doğu Karadeniz’de Kırsal Mimari (Rural architecture in the Eastern Black Sea Region). İstanbul, Turkey: Milli Reasürans TAŞ and Mas Matbaacılık AŞ. Cardinale, N. Rospi, G. & Stefanizzi, P. (2013). Energy and microclimatic performance of Mediterranean vernacular buildings: The Sassi District of Matera and the Trulli District of Alberobello. Building and Environment, 59, 590–598.
  4. Carmen Jimened Delgado, M. and Guerrero, I. C. (2006). Earth building in Spain. Construction and Building Materials, 20(9), 679–690.
  5. Dağ Gürcan, A. (2017). Toroslar’da Kırsal Mı̇marlık: Bozyazı, Dereköy O�rneğı̇. [Masters thesis, KTO Karatay University, Institute of Science]. Deniz, B. (1992). Manisa Yöresi Köy Ev Mimarisi. Arkeoloji-Sanat Tarihi Dergisi, 6, 17-50.
  6. Dickinson, R. E. (1949). Rural settlements in the German lands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 39(4), 239–263.
  7. ECOVAST (1996), Traditional rural architecture: A strategy for Europe. Eastleigh, United Kingdom. Enayat, A. (1952). Rural settlement types in the Uttar Pradesh (United Provinces of Agra and Oudh). Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 42(3), 223–246.
  8. Eres, Z. (2014). Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Çağdaş Kırsal Kimliğin Örneklenmesi: Planlı Göçmen Köyleri. Mimarlık, 375. Eres, Z. (1999). Tarih öncesi kazı yerlerinin koruma, restorasyon, sergileme sorunu ve çözüme yönelik bir uygulama Kırklareli-Aşağı Pınar Örneği. [Master’s thesis, Istanbul Technical University]. Eriç, M. (1979). Geleneksel Türk Mimarisinde Malzeme Seçim ve Kullanımı. Yapı Dergisi, 33, 42–45.
  9. Etlacakuş, A. & Hamamcıoğlu Turan, M. (2016). Historical Development of Darkale Rural Settlement in Soma, Manisa