Journals / Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

A Different Route for Drug Administration: Intraosseous Access and Infusion

Ilaç Uygulamaları Için Farklı Bir Yol: Intraosseöz Ulasım ve Infü

Pages
40–44
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to inform nurses, particularly the nurses who work in emergency services, on the subject of intraosseous treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In situations where emergency treatment is required, intraosseous drug administration is preferred as an alternative approach if the time for venous access via peripheral catheter is prolonged.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The intraosseous route is lifesaving since it provides faster access compared to peripheral catheterization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to inform nurses, particularly the nurses who work in emergency services, on the subject of intraosseous treatment.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In situations where emergency treatment is required, intraosseous drug administration is preferred as an alternative approach if the time for venous access via peripheral catheter is prolonged. The intraosseous route is lifesaving since it provides faster access compared to peripheral catheterization. With this method, the treatment is provided by accessing the intraosseous vascular network. However, as is the case with other intravenous administration, serious complications can occur during intraosseous treatment when the necessary follow-up is disregarded. Such complications can be prevented by nursing interventions such as preparing the patient before treatment, assisting the patient during treatment, and following up for possible complications after the treatment. The aim of this review is to inform nurses, particularly the nurses who work in emergency services, on the subject of intraosseous treatment.

Özet

Acil müdahale gerektiren durumlarda, periferik kateter ile vene ulasımsüresi uzadıgında alternatif bir yol olarak intraosseöz girisim tercihedilir. Intraosseöz yol, periferik kateter uygulamasına göre daha hızlıulasım sagladıgından yasam kurtarıcıdır. Bu yöntem ile kemik içindekivenöz damar agına ulasılarak tedavi saglanır. Ancak diger damariçi ilaç uygulamalarında oldugu gibi intraosseöz yoldan yapılan tedavisürecinde de gerekli takip ihmal edildiginde ciddi komplikasyonlar gelisebilmektedir.Söz konusu komplikasyonlar islem öncesinde hastanınhazırlıgı, islem sırasında hastaya yardımcı olma ve islem sonrasında görülebilecekkomplikasyonlara yönelik izlem gibi hemsirelik girisimleriile önlenebilir. Bu derlemede, özellikle acil birimlerde çalısan hemsirelerinintraosseöz tedavi konusunda bilgilendirilmesi amaçlanmıstır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSOY, A., ŞİMŞEK, P., BAYRAM, Ş. B. (2022). A Different Route for Drug Administration: Intraosseous Access and Infusion. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 40–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/536324

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lewis GC, Crapo SA, Williams JG. Critical skills and procedures in emergency medicine: Vascular access skills and procedures. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2013;31(1):59-86. doi: org/10.1016/j.emc.2012.09.006
  2. Leidel BA, Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Bogner V, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: a prospective, randomized study. Resuscitation. 2010;81(8):994-9. doi: org/10.1016/j. resuscitation. 2010.03.038
  3. Paxton JH. Intraosseous vascular access: A review. Trauma. 2012;14(3):195-232. doi: 10.1177/1460408611430175
  4. Vizcarra C, Clum S. Intraosseous route as alternative access for infusion therapy. J Infus Nurs. 2010;33(3):162-74. doi: 10.1097/ NAN.0b013e3181d9c7cf
  5. Duman A, Türkdogan KA, Yigit M. Intraosseöz Kateterizasyon. Derman Tıbbi Yayıncılık. Available from: http://www.jcam.com.tr/files/ JCAM-4292.pdf 6. Dolister M, Miller S, Borron S, Truemper, E, Shah M, Lanford MR, et al. Intraosseous vascular access is safe, effective and costs less than central venous catheters for patients in the hospital setting. J Vascular Access. 2013;14(3):216-24. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000130
  6. Alexander M, Corrigan A, Gorski, L, Hankins J. Perucca R. Infusion nurses society: infusion nursing, an evidence-based approach. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2010
  7. Cullen PM. Intraosseous cannulation in children. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine. 2012;13(1):28-30. doi: org/10.1016/j. mpaic.2011;10.001
  8. Gluckman W, Forti RJ, Lamba S. Intraosseous cannulation. eMedicine. 2006. Available from:
  9. Langley DM, Moran M. Intraosseous needles: they’re not just for kids anymore. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2008;34(4):318-9. doi: org/10.1016/j.jen.2007.07.005
  10. Luck RP, Haines C, Mull CC. Intraosseous access. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010;39(4):468-75. doi: org/10.1016/j. jemermed.2009.04.054
  11. Wheeler D, Wong H, Shanley T. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Evidence. 2nd ed. USA: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007
  12. Reades R, Studnek JR, Garrett JS, Vandeventer S, Blackwell T. Comparison of first-attempt success between tibial and humeral intraosseous insertions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2011;15(2):278-81. doi: or g/10.3109/10903127.2010.545479
  13. Frascone RJ, Jensen JP, Kaye K, Salzman JG. Consecutive  eld trials usi