Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

Cytological Differential Diagnosis Criteria of Liver Masses

Pages
217–222
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cytopathologic diagnosis should be confirmed with radiological and biochemical results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The objective of the study was to determine the critical diagnostic cytological features of the liver masses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study was conducted with 137 fine needle aspiration biopsies diagnosed in a 5-year period in Haydarpaşa Numune Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cytopathologic diagnosis should be confirmed with radiological and biochemical results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of the study was to determine the critical diagnostic cytological features of the liver masses. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted with 137 fine needle aspiration biopsies diagnosed in a 5-year period in Haydarpaşa Numune Hospital. All the glass slides of the cases were re-evaluated and 11 cytomorphologic features were investigated in each case. The results were evaluated by Stepwise Logistic Regression Analysis method. Results: Monotonous atypia, atypical hepatocytic naked nuclei, increased nucleus/cytoplasm (N/C) ratio, and hepatocytic morphology were critical for differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastasis. Increase N/C ratio and the absence of bile duct epithelial cells were critically important for differential diagnosis of HCC from benign liver mass. Discussion and Conclusion: Cytological diagnosis of liver mass is not difficult in cases where cytomorphological features are sufficient. The efficacy of cytology in the differentiation of benign liver masses from HCC is limited. This can be achieved by performing immunohistochemistry to the cell block. Cytopathologic diagnosis should be confirmed with radiological and biochemical results.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, D. (2022). Cytological Differential Diagnosis Criteria of Liver Masses. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 217–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/535921

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Sattar A, Khan AM, Anjum S, Naqvi A. Role of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of space occupying lesions of liver. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2014;26:334–6
  2. Kuo FY, Chen WJ, Lu SN, Wang JH, Eng HL. Fine needle aspira- tion cytodiagnosis of liver tumors. Acta Cytol 2004;48:142–8
  3. Conrad R, Castelino-Prabhu S, Cobb C, Raza A. Cytopatho- logic diagnosis of liver mass lesions. J Gastrointest Oncol 2013;4:53–61
  4. Wee A, Nilsson B. Highly well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and benign hepatocellular lesions. Can they be distinguished on fine needle aspiration biopsy? Acta Cytol 2003;47:16–26
  5. Das DK. Cytodiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in fine-needle aspirates of the liver: Its differentiation from re- active hepatocytes and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;21:370–7
  6. Berman J J. Me Neill RE. Cirrhosis with atypia. A potential pitfall in the interpretation of liver aspirates. Acta Cytol 1988;32:11–4
  7. Borzio M, Borzio F, Macchi R, Croce AM, Bruno S, Ferrari A, et al. The evaluation of fine-needle procedures for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions in cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1994;20:117–21
  8. Cohen C, Berson SD. Liver cell dysplasia in normal, cirrhotic, and hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer 1986;57:1535–8
  9. Wee A. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the liver: Algorithmic approach and current issues in the diagnosis of hepatocellu- lar carcinoma. Cytojournal 2005;2:7
  10. Wee A, Nilsson B, Tan LK, Yap I. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagnostic dillemma at the ends of the spectrum. Acta Cytol 1994;38:347–54
  11. Sheefa H, Lata J, Basharat M, Rumana M, Veena M. Utility of FNAC in conjunction with cell block for diagnosing space-oc- cupying lesion (SOL) of liver with emphasis on differentiating hepatocellular carcinomafrom metastatic SOL: Analysis of 61 cases. Oman Med J 2016;31:135–41
  12. Bottles K, Cohen MB, Holly EA, Chiu SH, Abele JS, Cello JP, et al. A step-wise logistic regression analysis of hepatocellular car- cinoma. An aspiration biopsy study. Cancer 1988;62:558–63
  13. Cohen MB, Haber MM, Holly EA, Ahn DK, Bottles K, Stoloff AC. Cytologic criteria to distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from nonneoplastic liver. Am J Clin Pathol 1991;95:125–30
  14. Kalogeraki A, Papadakis GZ, Tamiolakis D, Karvela-Kalogeraki I, Karvelas-Kalogerakis M, Segredakis J, et al. Fine Needle Aspi- ration Biopsy (FNAB) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carci- noma: