Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Kidney Biopsies in Adults; 10 Years Single-Center Experience

Pages
84–89
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We concluded that establishment of kidney biopsy databases both at local centers and at national scales would be beneficial in the evaluation of kidney diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Kidney biopsy is a frequent method of assessing the cause, extent and sometimes the appropriate treatment response of renal parenchymal diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we evaluated the clinicopathologic features of kidney biopsy exami- nations performed in our center for 10 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We concluded that establishment of kidney biopsy databases both at local centers and at national scales would be beneficial in the evaluation of kidney diseases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney biopsy is a frequent method of assessing the cause, extent and sometimes the appropriate treatment response of renal parenchymal diseases. In this study, we evaluated the clinicopathologic features of kidney biopsy exami- nations performed in our center for 10 years. Methods: A total of 532 native kidney biopsies performed in the adult age group between the years 2005-2014 in Hay- darpaşa Training and Research Hospital were evaluated retrospectively. All biopsy specimens were examined by light mi- croscopy and immunofluorescence by the same pathologist in the same laboratory. Results: The mean age of the cases was 41.3±12.8 years (18-65 years) and the percentage of males was 52.3% (n=278). The most frequent biopsy indication for primary and secondary glomerulonephritis was nephrotic-range proteinuria. The most frequent histopathologic diagnoses were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis among primary glomerulonephritis and dia- betic nephropathy among secondary glomerulonephritis. Discussion and Conclusion: As a result of the evaluation of 10-year kidney biopsy series at our center, results which are in general compatible with the national and international literature have been obtained. We concluded that establishment of kidney biopsy databases both at local centers and at national scales would be beneficial in the evaluation of kidney diseases.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, G., KASAPOĞLU, U., GÜMRÜKÇÜ, G., APAYDIN, S., TUĞCU, M. (2022). Evaluation of Kidney Biopsies in Adults; 10 Years Single-Center Experience. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1, 84–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/535882

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Coppo R, Troyanov S, Bellur S, Cattran D, Cook HT, Feehally J, et al. VALIGA Study of the ERA-EDTA Immunonephrology Working Group. Validation of the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy in cohorts with different presentations and treatments. Kidney Int 2014;86:828–36
  2. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:241–50
  3. Hogan JJ, Mocanu M, Berns JS. The native kidney biopsy: Up- date and evidence for best practice. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;11:354–62
  4. Pazianas M, Eastwood JB, MacRae KD, Phillips ME. Racial origin and primary renal diagnosis in 771 patients with end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1991;6:931–35
  5. Nast CC. Infection-related glomerulonephritis: Chang-ing demographics and outcomes. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2012;19:68–75
  6. Wolsteholme GE, Cameron MP. Ciba foundation symposium on renal biopsy: Clinical and pathological significance. Proc R Soc Med 1962;55:525
  7. Sugiyama H, Yokoyama H, Sato H, Saito T, Kohda Y, Nishi S, et al. Japan renal biopsy registry and Japan kidney disease reg- istry: Committee report for 2009 and 2010. Clin Exp Nephrol 2013;17:155–73
  8. McQuarrie EP, Mackinnon B, Young B, Yeoman L, Stewart G, Fleming S, et al, Scottish Renal Biopsy Registry. Centre varia- tion in incidence, indication and diagnosis of adult native re- nal biopsy in Scotland. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:1524–8
  9. Gesualdo L, Di Palma AM, Morrone LF, Strippoli GF, Schena FP, Italian Immunopathology Group, Italian Society of Nephrol- ogy. The Italian experience of the national registry of renal biopsies. Kidney Int 2004;66:890–4
  10. Simon P, Ramee MP, Boulahrouz R, Stanescu C, Charasse C, Ang KS, et al. Epidemiologic data of primary glomerular dis- eases in Western France. Kidney Int 2004;66:905–8
  11. Riispere Z, Ots-Rosenberg M. Occurrence of kidney diseases and patterns of glomerular disease based on a 10-year kidney biopsy material: A retrospective single-centre analysis in Esto- nia. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2012;46:389–94
  12. Polito MG, de Moura LA, Kirsztajn GM. An overview on fre- quency of renal biopsy diagnosis in Brazil: Clinical and pathological patterns based on 9,617 native kidney biopsies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;25:490–6
  13. Ozturk S, Sumnu A, Seyahi N, Gullulu M, Sipahioglu M, Artan S, et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics of primary glomerular disease