Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1

Psychoactive Substance Use and Related Factors Among High Schools

Pages
58–64
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall lifetime substance use, gender differences in substance preferences, students’ problematic behaviors and their ef- fects on the substance use ratios, reasons for substance usage, locations where the students use the substances and sources where the substances were obtained, how the substance use ratios were affected by user friends and relatives were the covered objects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Adolescence is considered to be the most risky period for experimenting with harmful substances.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to determine the psychoactive substance consumption rates among all of the high school students in city center of Edirne, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall lifetime substance use, gender differences in substance preferences, students’ problematic behaviors and their ef- fects on the substance use ratios, reasons for substance usage, locations where the students use the substances and sources where the substances were obtained, how the substance use ratios were affected by user friends and relatives were the covered objects.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescence is considered to be the most risky period for experimenting with harmful substances. This study aims to determine the psychoactive substance consumption rates among all of the high school students in city center of Edirne, Turkey. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 8.483 high school students. The survey form used in the present study was compiled from questionnaires used in “The European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs” study. Overall lifetime substance use, gender differences in substance preferences, students’ problematic behaviors and their ef- fects on the substance use ratios, reasons for substance usage, locations where the students use the substances and sources where the substances were obtained, how the substance use ratios were affected by user friends and relatives were the covered objects. Results: A total of 8402 school students aged 15-19 years completed the questionnaire, 53.0 % of which were females. Al- cohol was the most common substance used (24.6%), followed by tobacco (21.5%) and cannabis (1%). Frequency of other substances remained under 1%. Tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, ecstasy, inhalants, and cocaine usage were significantly higher in males. Having problematic behaviours were associated with the rise in substances usage. User friends were both the main reason of usage and the supplier of the substances. The main location where the students use substances were the streets. Discussion and Conclusion: Although frequencies of psychoactive substance usage among high school students of Edirne were found to be lower than most of the other locations all around the world, students’ problematic behaviours and risk factors were similar.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, R. K., GÖRGÜLÜ, Y., VARDAR, E., SÖNMEZ, M. B., MANAY, D. (2022). Psychoactive Substance Use and Related Factors Among High Schools. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1, 58–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/535877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hale DR, Viner RM. Policy responses to multiple risk behav- iours in adolescents. J Public Health (Oxf ) 2012;34(Suppl 1):i11–9
  2. Peacock A, Leung J, Larney S, Colledge S, Hickman M, Rehm J, et al. Global statistics on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use: 2017 status report. Addiction 2018;113:1905–26
  3. Kozeny J, Csemy L, Tisanska L. Predictors of the problematic pattern of the cannabis users’ behavior in adolescents: The ESPAD survey report. Cesk Psychol 2016;60:584–96
  4. Molinaro S, Benedetti E, Scalese M, Bastiani L, Fortunato L, Cerrai S, et al. Prevalence of youth gambling and potential in- fluence of substance use and other risk factors throughout 33 European countries: First results from the 2015 ESPAD study. Addiction 2018;113:1862–73
  5. Mendel JR, Berg CJ, Windle RC, Windle M. Predicting young adulthood smoking among adolescent smokers and non- smokers. Am J Health Behav 2012;36:542–54
  6. Winters KC, Stinchfield R, Latimer WW, Lee S. Long-term out- come of substance-dependent youth following 12-step treat- ment. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007;33:61–9
  7. Hammond CJ, Mayes LC, Potenza MN. Neurobiology of ado - lescent substance use and addictive behaviors: Treatment im- plications. Adolesc Med State Art Rev 2014;25:15–32
  8. MacKillop J, Amlung MT, Few LR, Ray LA, Sweet LH, Munafo MR. Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011;216:305–21
  9. Cote AL, Rolland B, Cottencin O. Addiction in adolescence: Who is really losing control? Addiction 2013;108:1516–7
  10. Birhanu AM, Bisetegn TA, Woldeyohannes SM. High preva- lence of substance use and associated factors among high school adolescents in Woreta Town, Northwest Ethiopia: Mul- ti-domain factor analysis. BMC Public Health 2014;14:1186
  11. Hale D, Viner R. Trends in the prevalence of multiple substance use in adolescents in England, 1998-2009. J Public Health (Oxf ) 2013;35:367–74
  12. Martinez-Loredo V, Fernandez-Hermida JR, Fernandez-Arta- mendi S, Carballo JL, Garcia-Cueto E, Garcia-Rodriguez O. The association of both self-reported and behavioral impulsivity with the annual prevalence of substance use among early adolescents. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2015;10:23
  13. McDermott MJ, Drescher CF, Smitherman TA, Tull MT, Heiden L, Damon JD, et al. Prevalence and sociodemographic corre- lates of lifetime substance use among a rural and diverse sam- ple of adolescents. Subst Abus 2013;34:371–80
  14. Park S, Kim Y. Prevalence, correlate