Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1

The Prediction of Bethesda Category of Thyroid Nodule with Specific Sonographic Findings

Pages
12–17
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Among Bethesda category 2 nodules, iso-/hyper-echogenicity, well-defined contour, solid plus cystic component, thin halo and multiplicity were more prevalent (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Ultrasound (US) is frequently performed for imaging of thyroid.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 1488 patients [1260 women (85%) and 228 men (15%) with a mean age of 49 years] who had undergone US guided FNAB were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Among Bethesda category 2 nodules, iso-/hyper-echogenicity, well-defined contour, solid plus cystic component, thin halo and multiplicity were more prevalent (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound (US) is frequently performed for imaging of thyroid. So, the number of incidentally detected thy- roid nodule and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is increasing gradually. We aimed to depict specific sonographic char- acteristics of thyroid nodule in each cytological Bethesda category for planning patient management and reducing the number of unnecessary FNAB or short-term follow-up. Methods: A total of 1488 patients [1260 women (85%) and 228 men (15%) with a mean age of 49 years] who had undergone US guided FNAB were included in the study. US and FNAB findings were reviewed retrospectively. US features (size, contour, echogenicity, multiplicity, solid/cystic nature, the existence of halo, calcifications, lymphadenopathy and thyroiditis) were recorded. The correlation of sonographic and cytological findings was investigated in each Bethesda category. Results: A total of 1488 patients were enrolled in our study. Among Bethesda category 2 nodules, iso-/hyper-echogenicity, well-defined contour, solid plus cystic component, thin halo and multiplicity were more prevalent (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜKTE, Y., TOPAL, C. S., OYSU, A. S., KULALI, F., DEMİR, M. (2022). The Prediction of Bethesda Category of Thyroid Nodule with Specific Sonographic Findings. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1, 12–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/535871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. de Alcântara-Jones DM, de Alcântara-Nunes TF, Rocha Bde O, de Oliveira RD, Santana AC, de Alcântara FT, et al. Is there any association between Hashimoto's thyroiditis and thyroid can- cer? A retrospective data analysis. Radiol Bras 2015;48:148–53
  2. Nandedkar SS, Dixit M, Malukani K, Varma AV, Gambhir S. Eval- uation of Thyroid Lesions by Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology According to Bethesda System and its Histopathological Cor- relation. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2018;8:76–82
  3. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thy- roid Cytopathology. Thyroid 2017;27:1341–6
  4. Dhyani M, Faquin W, Lubitz CC, Daniels GH, Samir AE. How to interpret thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy reports: a guide for the busy radiologist in the era of the Bethesda Clas- sification System. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:1335–9
  5. Liu X, Medici M, Kwong N, Angell TE, Marqusee E, Kim MI, et al. Bethesda Categorization of Thyroid Nodule Cytology and Prediction of Thyroid Cancer Type and Prognosis. Thyroid 2016;26:256–61
  6. Godoi Cavalheiro B, Kober Nogueira Leite A, Luongo de Matos L, Palermo Miazaki A, Marcel Ientile J, Aurelio V Kulcsar M, et al. Malignancy Rates in Thyroid Nodules Classified as Bethesda Categories III and IV: Retrospective Data from a Tertiary Cen- ter. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2017;16:e12871
  7. Persichetti A, Di Stasio E, Guglielmi R, Bizzarri G, Taccogna S, Misischi I, et al. Predictive Value of Malignancy of Thyroid No- dule Ultrasound Classification Systems: A Prospective Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018;103:1359–68
  8. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Man- agement Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid As- sociation Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Dif- ferentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016 Jan;26:1–133
  9. Haugen BR. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differ- entiated Thyroid Cancer: What is new and what has changed? Cancer 2017;123:372–81
  10. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data Sys-tem (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:587–95
  11. Zhuang Y, Li C, Hua Z, Chen K, Lin JL. A novel TIRADS of US classification. Biomed Eng Online 2018;17:82
  12. Koseoglu Atilla FD, Ozgen Saydam B, Erarslan