Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 2

Seven-Year Evaluation of Percutaneous and Mucosal Injury in Health-Care Professionals

Pages
123–127
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It should be kept in mind that safety is paramount, and maximum attention should be paid to every action taken.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Hospital environments are places where patients are admitted due to sharp object injuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study, it was aimed to evaluate stab wounds in a 7-year period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It should be kept in mind that safety is paramount, and maximum attention should be paid to every action taken.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Hospital environments are places where patients are admitted due to sharp object injuries. Therefore, hospitals pose a risk for many diseases that can be transmitted by blood products. Although many diseases can be transmitted as a result of stab wounds, the most important ones are Hepatitis-B, Hepatitis-C, and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Virus. In our study, it was aimed to evaluate stab wounds in a 7-year period. Methods: A total of 452 injuries from two different centers were included in the study. Age, gender, time of the injury, serological results of the patient and the personnel exposed to the injury, type of injury, duration of duty of the health personnel, type of exposure, occupational group, and location of the injury were scanned from the Infection Control Committee records and recorded in the study forms. Results: The mean age of the cases was 29.7±8.2, and 272 (60.2%) were women. The most frequently injured health personnel were nurses and trainees. A majority of the (81.2%) injuries were caused by the needle tip. Source serology was determined in 67.3% of the cases and serologic positivity was found in 19.4% of them. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, no stab wounds were reported in the units dealing with COVID-19 patients during this period. Discussion and Conclusion: Despite the precautions taken, stab wounds still continue to be an important problem today. The fact that a significant portion of these injuries is preventable increases the importance of the problem. Especially, with the COVID-19 pandemic, the fact that sharp object injuries were not reported in the units where these patients were treated shows that the injuries can be seriously reduced if the personnel comply with the precautions and safety precautions at the maximum level. It should be kept in mind that safety is paramount, and maximum attention should be paid to every action taken.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTUNÇ, B., ÇOMOĞLU, Ş. (2022). Seven-Year Evaluation of Percutaneous and Mucosal Injury in Health-Care Professionals. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 2, 123–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/535851

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. CDC. Updated U.S. public health service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ rr5011a1.htm. Accessed Dec 13, 2021
  2. Sardesai RV, Gaurkar SP, Sardesai VR, Sardesai VV. Awareness of needle-stick injuries among health-care workers in a tertiary health-care center. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS 2018;39:107– 10
  3. Mehta A, Rodrigues C, Ghag S, Bavi P, Shenai S, Dastur F. Needlestick injuries in a tertiary care centre in Mumbai, India. J Hosp Infect 2005;60:368–73
  4. King KC, Strony R. Needlestick. 2021 Aug 11. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022
  5. Kaya Ş, Baysal B, Eşkazan AE, Çolak H. Evaluation of sharps injuries in Diyarbakir Training and Research Hospital health workers. J Viral Hepat 2012;18:107–10
  6. Korkmaz P, Çevik F, Aykın N, Yaşar ZD, Uğur M, Güldüren HM, et al. Evaluation of percutaneous injuries occured in our healthcare workers between the years 2008-2013. FLORA 2014;19:32–7
  7. Grimmond T, Bylund S, Anglea C, Beeke L, Callahan A, Christiansen E, et al. Sharps injury reduction using a sharps container with enhanced engineering: A 28 hospital nonrandomized intervention and cohort study. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:799–805
  8. Dizili-Yelgin C, Çıkman A, Karakeçili F, Gülhan B, Aydın M. Evaluation of sharps injuries in a training and research hospital. Klimik J 2018;31:200–4 9. Çelik N, Ünal O, Çelik O, Soylu A. Evaluation of sharp object injuries of health workers in our hospital during last four years. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2017;37:61–7
  9. Nelson NP, Weng MK, Hofmeister MG, Moore KL, Doshani M, Kamili S, et al. Prevention of Hepatitis A virus infection in the United States: Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep 2020;69:1–38
  10. Kuhar DT, Henderson DK, Struble KA, Heneine W, Thomas V, Cheever LW, et al. Updated US Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to human immunodeficiency virus and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:875–92
  11. Triassi M, Pennino F. Infectious risk for healthcare workers: Evaluation and prevention. Ann Ig 2018;30:48–51
  12. HIV/AIDS tanı izleme ve tedavi el kitabı. Available at: https:// www.ekmud.org.tr/files/uploads/files/HIV-ADIS-el-kitabi.pdf. Accessed Dec 14, 2021.