Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Pediatric Forearm Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of Thirty Four Cases

Çocuk Ön Kol Kırıklarının Cerrahi Tedavisinde Elastik Stabil Kanal-İçi Çivileme: Otuz Dört Hastanın Retrospektif Analizi

Pages
104–108
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In a subjective measure of outcome during follow-up,it was observed that 33 patients (97.06%) were very satisfied and one(2.94%) was satisfied; no patient reported being not satisfied.Conclusion: Since titanium elastic nailing is a safe and effectivemethod of treatment with advantages of easy implantation andremoval as well as excellent cosmetic and functional results, elasticstable intramedullary nailing is the first treatment option that shouldbe considered in pediatric both bone forearm fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this investigation was to present our institutionalexperience of 34 pediatric both bone forearm fractures treated withtitanium elastic intramedullary nails.Methods: Thirty-four patients, who were treated with titanium elasticnail for both bone forearm fractures diagnosis between 2011 and2016, were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Clinical and radiological evaluationof the patients was retrospectively analyzed.Results: Bone healing process was completed for all patients at amean of 6.6 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In a subjective measure of outcome during follow-up,it was observed that 33 patients (97.06%) were very satisfied and one(2.94%) was satisfied; no patient reported being not satisfied.Conclusion: Since titanium elastic nailing is a safe and effectivemethod of treatment with advantages of easy implantation andremoval as well as excellent cosmetic and functional results, elasticstable intramedullary nailing is the first treatment option that shouldbe considered in pediatric both bone forearm fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this investigation was to present our institutionalexperience of 34 pediatric both bone forearm fractures treated withtitanium elastic intramedullary nails.Methods: Thirty-four patients, who were treated with titanium elasticnail for both bone forearm fractures diagnosis between 2011 and2016, were included in the study. Clinical and radiological evaluationof the patients was retrospectively analyzed.Results: Bone healing process was completed for all patients at amean of 6.6 weeks. The implants were removed at a mean time of9.7 months from the index operation. Complications, including skininfections at the entry side of the nail, were recorded in three (8.82%)patients. These three patients had type 1 open fracture according to theGustilo-Anderson classification and were treated with first generationcephalosporins. In a subjective measure of outcome during follow-up,it was observed that 33 patients (97.06%) were very satisfied and one(2.94%) was satisfied; no patient reported being not satisfied.Conclusion: Since titanium elastic nailing is a safe and effectivemethod of treatment with advantages of easy implantation andremoval as well as excellent cosmetic and functional results, elasticstable intramedullary nailing is the first treatment option that shouldbe considered in pediatric both bone forearm fractures.

Özet

Amaç: Çocuk önkol çift kırıklarının cerrahi tedavisinde elastik intramedüller çivileme uyguladığımız 34 hastanın sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 2011-2016 yılları arasında önkol çift kemik kırığı tanısı ile titanyum elastik çivi uyguladığımız 34 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların klinik ve radyolojik takipleri geriye dönük analiz edildi. Bulgular: Hastalarda ortalama kaynama süresi 6,6 haftaydı. İmplantların çıkarılma zamanı ortalama 9,7 aydı. Hastaların üçünde (%8,82) çivi giriş yerinde deri enfeksiyonu tespit edildi. Bu üç hasta Gustillo Anderson sınıflamasına göre tip 1 açık kırık olan hastaydı ve birinci kuşak sefalosporin ile tedavi edildi. Bir hasta dışında tüm hastalarda (%97,06) klinik ve radyolojik olarak Price kriterlerine göre mükemmel sonuç elde edildi. Sonuç: Klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlarının iyi olması, uygulama tekniğinin ve implant çıkartılmasının kolay olması, daha az yumuşak doku hasarına yol açması nedeniyle çocuk önkol çift kırıklarının cerrahi tedavisinde elastik stabil intramedüller çivileme uygulamasının iyi bir seçenek olduğunu düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, M., ATLIHAN, D., SÜRÜCÜ, S., ÇAPKIN, S., GÜNAYDIN, F. (2022). Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Pediatric Forearm Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of Thirty Four Cases. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 104–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/535109

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cheng JC, Shen WY. Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: a study of 3350 children. J Orthop Trauma 1993;7:15-22. Landin LA. Epidemiology of children’s fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B 1997;6:79-83.
  2. Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. J Pediatr Orthop 1986;6:656-60.
  3. Creasman C, Zaleske DJ, Ehrlich MG. Analyzing forearm fractures in children: the more subtle signs of impending problems. Clin Orthop 1984;188:40-53.
  4. Franklin CC, Robinson J, Noonan K, Flynn JM. Evidence-based medicine: management of pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32 (Suppl 2):S131-4. Flynn JM, Jones KJ, Garner MR, Goebel J. 11 years experience in the operative management of pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2010;30:313-9.
  5. Li Y, Stabile KJ, Shilt JS. Biomechanical analysis of titanium elastic nail fixation in a pediatric femur fracture model. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28:874-8.
  6. Mahar A, Sink E, Faro F, Oka R, Newton PO. Differences in biomechanical stability of femur fracture fixation when using titanium nails of increasing diameter. J Child Orthop 2007;1:211-5.
  7. Pogorelic Z, Furlan D, Biocić M, Mestrović J, Jurić I, Todorić D. Titanium intramedullary nailing for treatment of simple bone cysts of the long bones in children. Scott Med J 2010;55:35- 8. Wall EJ, Jain V, Vora V, Mehlman CT, Crawford AH. Complications of titanium and stainless steel elastic nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2008;90:1305-13.
  8. Price CT, Scott DS, Kurzner ME, Flynn JC. Malunited forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:705-12.
  9. Fernandez FF, Egenolf M, Carsten C, Holz F, Schneider S, Wentzensen A. Unstable diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the forearm in children plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing. Injury 2005;36:1210-6.
  10. Salonen A, Salonen H, Pajulo O. A critical analysis of postoperative complications of antebrachium TEN-nailing in 35 children. Scand J Surg 2012;101:216-21.
  11. Shoemaker S. Comstock C. Mubarak S, Wenger DR, Chambers HG. Intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation of open or unstable forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1999;19:329-37.
  12. Lascombes P, Prevot J, Ligier JN, Metaizeau JP, Poncelet T. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing in forearm shaft fractures in children: 85 cases. J Ped Orthop 1990;10:167-71.
  13. Garg NK, Bhallal MS, Malek IA, Webster RA, Bruce CE. Use of elastic stable intramedullary nailing for treating unstable forearm fracture in children. J Trauma 2008;65:109