Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

Ossification Time of Distal Humeral Epiphyses by Gender in the Pre-pubertal Period

Pre-pubertal Dönemde Humerus Distal Epifizlerinin Cinsiyete Göre Ossifikasyon Zamanı

Pages
42–46
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Whencompared with girls, the medial epicondyle and fusion times werefound to be earlier in boys than in girls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: It was aimed to determine the differences in time of physealclosure and the appearance of humeral distal epiphyses in the prepubertalperiod between genders.Methods: Radiological data of the first 200 healthy children in the prepubertalperiod, who underwent diagnostic X-ray imaging of the elbowdue to the complaints of the elbow region between January 2012and January 2017, were collected.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Theages, in which the lines between lateral epicondyle and lateral condyle,lateral condyle and trochlea, medial epicondyle and humerus, humerusand lateral epicondyle, and lateral epicondyle and trochlea epiphyseswere found to be closed, were documented by gender.Results: Examining the mean ossification time by gender for lateralepicondyle, trochlea, medial epicondyle, and lateral condyle, this timewas found to be nine months early, nine months early, 10 monthsearly, and two months late for the girls, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Whencompared with girls, the medial epicondyle and fusion times werefound to be earlier in boys than in girls.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: It was aimed to determine the differences in time of physealclosure and the appearance of humeral distal epiphyses in the prepubertalperiod between genders.Methods: Radiological data of the first 200 healthy children in the prepubertalperiod, who underwent diagnostic X-ray imaging of the elbowdue to the complaints of the elbow region between January 2012and January 2017, were collected. The presence of lateral epicondyle,lateral condyle, trochlea, and medial epicondyle epiphysis cores on theelbow radiographs was classified and labeled by age and gender. Theages, in which the lines between lateral epicondyle and lateral condyle,lateral condyle and trochlea, medial epicondyle and humerus, humerusand lateral epicondyle, and lateral epicondyle and trochlea epiphyseswere found to be closed, were documented by gender.Results: Examining the mean ossification time by gender for lateralepicondyle, trochlea, medial epicondyle, and lateral condyle, this timewas found to be nine months early, nine months early, 10 monthsearly, and two months late for the girls, respectively. The mean physealclosure time in girls were found to be 13 months earlier for the lateralepicondyle-lateral condyle physis, seven months earlier for lateralcondyle-trochlea physis, eight months later for lateral epicondyle-lateralcondyle-trochlea-humerus physis, and nine months later for medialepicondyle-humerus physis.Conclusion: In the literature, a delay was observed in ossification timeof lateral condyle in girls and medial epicondyle in both genders. Whencompared with girls, the medial epicondyle and fusion times werefound to be earlier in boys than in girls.

Özet

Amaç: Puberte öncesi dönemde humerus distal epifizlerinin yaş ve cinsiyete göre görünme ve fiz hatlarının kapanma zamanındaki farklılıklarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Dirsek bölgesinde yakınma nedeniyle tanı amaçlı dirsek X-ray çekilen puberte öncesi sağlıklı toplam ilk 200 çocuğun radyolojik verileri toplandı. Olguların dirsek grafilerinde lateral epikondil, lateral kondil, troklea ve medial epikondilin epifiz çekirdeklerinin varlığı yaş ve cinsiyete göre sınıflandırılarak kayıt edildi. Lateral epikondil ile lateral kondil, lateral kondil ile troklea, medial epikondil ile humerus, humerus ile lateral epikondil lateral kondil troklea epifizleri arası hattın kapalı görüldüğü yaşlar cinsiyete göre dokümante edildi. Bulgular: Ortalama ossifikasyon zamanı lateral epikondil, troklea, medial epikondil, lateral kondil için cinsiyete göre değerlendirildiğinde sırasıyla kızlarda dokuz ay erken, dokuz ay erken, 10 ay erken ve iki ay geç tesbit edildi. Fiz hatlarının ortalama kapanma zamanı cinsiyete göre değerlendirildiğinde kızlarda lateral epikondil-lateral kondil fiz hattı için 13 ay erken, lateral kondil-troklea fiz hattı için yedi ay erken, lateral epikondil-lateral kondil-troklea-humerus fiz hattı için sekiz ay geç, medial epikondil-humerus fiz hattı için dokuz ay geç tespit edildi. Sonuç: Literatüre göre kızlarda lateral kondilin, her iki cinste ise medial epikondilin ossifikasyon zamanında gecikme vardı. Medial epikondil ve füzyon zamanı kızlarda erkeklerden daha erkendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALIK, M. S. (2022). Ossification Time of Distal Humeral Epiphyses by Gender in the Pre-pubertal Period. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 42–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/535086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Neyzi O, Ertuğrul T. Pediatric. 2. edition. İstanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstores, 1993, 61-100. Bourguıgnon JP. Control of the onset of puberty. In: Pescovitz OH, Eugster EA (eds). Pediatric Endocrinology: mechanisms, manifestations and management. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2004, 285-98.
  2. Parent AS, Teilmann G, Juul A, Skakkebaek NE, Toppari J, Bourguignon JP. The timing of normal puberty and the age limits of sexual precocity: variations around the world, secular trends, and changes after migration. Endocr Rev 2003;24:668-93. Styne DM. Puberty, obesity and ethnicity. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2004;15:472-8.
  3. Büyükgebiz A, Böber E. Delayed puberty and other pubertal problems. Günöz H, Öcal G, Yordam N, Kurtoğlu S. Pediatric Endocrinology. Kayseri: Pediatric Endocrinology and Oxygen Society Publications; 2003:189-213.
  4. Georgopoulos N, Markou K, Theodoropoulou A, et all. Growth and pubertal development in elite female rhythmic gymnasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:4525-30. Tahirovic HF. Menarchal age and the stress of war: an example from Bosnia. Eur J Pediatr 1998;157:978-80.
  5. Canavese F, Charles YP, Dimeglio A. Skeletal age assessment from elbow radiographs. Review of the literatüre Chir Organi Mov 2008;92:1-6.
  6. Charles YP, Canavese F, Dimeglio A. Skeletal age determination from the elbow during pubertal growth. Orthopade 2005;34:1052-3.
  7. Weise K, Schwab E, Scheufele TM. Elbow injuries in childhood. Unfallchirurg 1997;100:255-69. Shrader MW.Pediatric supracondylar fractures and pediatric physeal elbow fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2008;39:163- 71. Jacoby SM, Herman MJ, Morrison WB, Osterman AL.Pediatric elbow trauma: an orthopaedic perspective on the importance of radiographic interpretation. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2007;11:48-56.
  8. Carey J, Spence L, Blickman H, Eustace S. MRI of pediatric growth plate injury: correlation with plain film radiographs and clinical outcome. Skeletal radiology 1998;27:250-5.
  9. Ruffing T, Danko T, Henzler T, Weiss C, Hofmann A, Muhm M. Number of positive radiographic findings in pediatric trauma patients. Emerg Radiol 2017;24:281-6.
  10. Iyer RS, Thapa MM, Khanna PC, Chew FS. Pediatric bone imaging: imaging elbow trauma in children--a review of acute and chronic injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:1053- 68. Jacob A, Khan S. Radiology of acute elbow injuries. Br J Hosp Med 2010;71:6-9.
  11. Louahem DM, Bourelle S, Buscayret F, et al. Displaced medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus: surgical treatment and results. A