Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 4

Non-appendicitis Diagnoses in Patients Operated Due to Acute Appendicitis

Akut Apandisit Nedeniyle Ameliyat Edilen Hastalarda Apandisit Dışı Tanılar

Pages
405–408
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Normal appendix was found in 0.6% and non-appendicitis pathologies in 1.5% (n=33) of patients.Conclusion: Despite advances in radiological imaging a significant number of malignancies and other diagnoses might be detected in patients operated for acute appendicitis; therefore, histopathological analysis of appendicectomy specimens is of great importance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate patients who were operated due to acute appendicitis and who were later determined to have non-appendicitis pathologies.Methods: The demographic characteristics, histopathological results existence of perforation, complications and the length of hospital stay were recorded.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data of the patients who were determined to have histopathological results other than acute appendicitis were analyzed.Results: A total of 2112 patients, who underwent surgery due to acute appendicitis were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Normal appendix was found in 0.6% and non-appendicitis pathologies in 1.5% (n=33) of patients.Conclusion: Despite advances in radiological imaging a significant number of malignancies and other diagnoses might be detected in patients operated for acute appendicitis; therefore, histopathological analysis of appendicectomy specimens is of great importance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate patients who were operated due to acute appendicitis and who were later determined to have non-appendicitis pathologies.Methods: The demographic characteristics, histopathological results existence of perforation, complications and the length of hospital stay were recorded. The data of the patients who were determined to have histopathological results other than acute appendicitis were analyzed.Results: A total of 2112 patients, who underwent surgery due to acute appendicitis were included in the study. Sixty-seven-point-five percent of the patients were male (n=1426). The average age was 33.6±12.9 years and the median age was 30 (19-90) years. The patients were divided into two groups as those under the age of 30 (Group 1) and above the age of 30 (Group 2). No significant differences were detected between the two groups in terms of histopathological diagnoses, perforation, complication and length of hospital stay. Normal appendix was found in 0.6% and non-appendicitis pathologies in 1.5% (n=33) of patients.Conclusion: Despite advances in radiological imaging a significant number of malignancies and other diagnoses might be detected in patients operated for acute appendicitis; therefore, histopathological analysis of appendicectomy specimens is of great importance.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada akut apandisit nedeniyle ameliyat edilen ancak apandisit dışı patoloji saptanan hastaları değerlendirmek amaçlandı. Yöntemler: Akut apandisit nedeniyle 2009-2014 yılları arasında acil cerrahi girişim uygulanan hastaların dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Terminal patolojisi akut apandisit dışında saptanan olguların verileri değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Akut apandisit nedeniyle ameliyat edilen ve kayıtlarına ulaşılabilen 2112 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların %67,5’i erkekti (n=1426). Yaş ortalaması 33,6±12,9, ortanca yaş 30 (19-90) saptandı. Hastaların %1,7’sinde (n=36) apandisit dışı patolojiler (örneğin; nöroendokrin tümör, enflamatuvar bağırsak hastalığı, mukosel vs.) olarak saptandı. On olguda patoloji nöroendokrin tümör, yedi olguda müsinöz neoplazi, üç olguda müsinöz adenokarsinom, üç olguda mukosel ve 10 olguda enflamatuvar bağırsak hastalığı ile uyumlu olarak saptandı. Sonuç: Radyolojik görüntüleme yöntemlerindeki tüm gelişmelere rağmen akut apandisit nedeniyle opere edilen hastalarda hala azımsanmayacak bir oranda malignite ve diğer tanılar saptanabilmektedir. Bu nedenle ameliyat sonrası histopatolojik sonuçlar yakın takip edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇITLAK, G., DEĞERLİ, M. S., GÜR, H. Ü., DİNÇER, M. (2022). Non-appendicitis Diagnoses in Patients Operated Due to Acute Appendicitis. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 4, 405–408. https://ajindex.com/articles/535073

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, et al. Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg 2014;101:e9-22
  2. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:910-25
  3. Huston JM, Kao LS, Chang PK, et al. Antibiotics vs. appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in adults: Review of the evidence and future directions. Surg Infect 2017;18:527-35
  4. Charfi S, Sellami A, Affes A, Yaïch, Mzali R, Boudawara TS. Histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a study of 24,697 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:1009-12
  5. Omiyale AO, Adjepong S. Histopathological correlations of appendectomies: a clinical audit of a single center. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:119
  6. David RF, Thomas DK. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis using administrative data. J Sur Res 2005;123:257-61
  7. Akbulut S, Tas M, Sogutcu N et al. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1961-70
  8. Duzgun AP, Moran M, Uzun S, et al. Unusual findings in appendicectomy specimens: Evaluation of 2458 cases and review of the literature. Indian J Surg 2004;66:221-6
  9. Mariadason JG, Wang WN, Wallack MK, et al. Negative appendicectomy rate as a quality metric in the management of appendicitis: impact of computed tomography, Alvarado score and the definition of negative appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;94:395-401
  10. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, et al Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 1999;229:344-9
  11. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Ravn H. Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equıvocal of diagnosis appendicitis. World J Surg 2000;24:479-85
  12. Swank HA, Eshuis EJ, Ubbink DT, et al. Is routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens useful? A systematic review of the literature. Colorectal Dis 2011;13:1214-21
  13. Shapiro R, Eldar S, Sadot E, et al. The significance of occult carcinoids in the era of laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2197-9
  14. Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7, 970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:75-80.