Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter

5-10 mm Böbrek Taşlarında Retrograde Intrarenal Cerrahi ile Mikroperkütan Nefrolitotomi Sonuçlarının Kıyaslanması

Pages
148–152
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The stone-free rate was 85.7% in the RIRSgroup and 78.2% in the micro-PNL group (p=0.43).Conclusion: Both methods can be administered as alternativemodalities with high success and low complication rates.However, analgesics requirement was higher in micro-PNL group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the results of micro-percutaneousnephrolithotomy (micro-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS) for symptomatic renal stones 5-10 mm in diameter.Methods: A total of 86 patients, who underwent RIRS (n=53)and micro-PNL (n=23), were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Unresolvedcoagulopathy, active urinary infection, morbid obesity, missingdata and pregnancy were considered the criteria for exclusion.The groups were compared in terms of operative time, Visualanalogue scale score, analgesic requirement, retreatment,transition to other treatment, complication and stone-free ratesand length of hospital stay.Results: Both surgical techniques were similar for all parametersexcept need for analgesics, which was higher in the micro-PNLgroup (p=0.026).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The stone-free rate was 85.7% in the RIRSgroup and 78.2% in the micro-PNL group (p=0.43).Conclusion: Both methods can be administered as alternativemodalities with high success and low complication rates.However, analgesics requirement was higher in micro-PNL group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To compare the results of micro-percutaneousnephrolithotomy (micro-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS) for symptomatic renal stones 5-10 mm in diameter.Methods: A total of 86 patients, who underwent RIRS (n=53)and micro-PNL (n=23), were evaluated retrospectively. Urineanalysis, serum creatinine level, urine culture and non-contrastcomputed tomography scan were performed in all patientspreoperatively. Kidney stones were opaque in all cases. Unresolvedcoagulopathy, active urinary infection, morbid obesity, missingdata and pregnancy were considered the criteria for exclusion.The groups were compared in terms of operative time, Visualanalogue scale score, analgesic requirement, retreatment,transition to other treatment, complication and stone-free ratesand length of hospital stay.Results: Both surgical techniques were similar for all parametersexcept need for analgesics, which was higher in the micro-PNLgroup (p=0.026). The stone-free rate was 85.7% in the RIRSgroup and 78.2% in the micro-PNL group (p=0.43).Conclusion: Both methods can be administered as alternativemodalities with high success and low complication rates.However, analgesics requirement was higher in micro-PNL group.

Özet

Amaç: 5-10 mm böbrek taşına sahip hastalarda retrograd intrarenal cerrahi (RIRC) ve mikroperkütan nefrolitotomi (mikroPNL) operasyonlarının sonuçlarını karşılaştırmak amaçlandı. Yöntemler: RIRC ve mikro-PNL yapılan hastaların kayıtları hastane dijital veri tabanı ve servis dosyalarından tarandı ve bunlar içerisinden opak taşa sahip 53’ü RIRC olmak üzere toplam 86 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Düzeltilemeyen koagülopatiye, aktif üriner enfeksiyona, morbid obeziteye, eksik veriye ve opak olmayan taşa sahip hastalar çalışmadan dışlandı. Operasyon öncesi tüm hastalara tam idrar tetkiki, kreatinin, idrar kültürü, kontrastsız bilgisayarlı tomografi yapıldı. Gruplar demografik veriler, taş karakteristikleri, operasyon süresi, Görsel Ağrı skoru, ağrı kesici ihtiyacı, yeniden tedavi ve diğer tedaviye geçiş oranları, komplikasyon oranları, hastanede kalış süresi ve başarı açılarından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ağrı kesici ihtiyacı mikro-PNL grubunda daha yüksek bulundu (p=0,026). Bakılan diğer parametreler her iki grupta benzer idi. Taşsızlık oranı RIRC grubunda %85,7; mikro-PNL grubunda %78,2 idi (p=0,43). Sonuç: RIRC ve Mikro-PNL, 5-10 mm arası böbrek taşlarında benzer başarı oranlarına sahip olmasına karşın analjezik ihtiyacı açısından RIRC daha avantajlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAYDIN, B., GÜNER, B. (2022). Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones 5-10 mm in Diameter. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2, 148–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/535031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:468-74
  2. Desai J, Solanki R. Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium. BJU Int 2013;112:1046-9
  3. Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int 2016;117:655-61
  4. Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S, et al. Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol 2011;186:140-5
  5. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater—is this the new frontier? J Urol 2008;179:981-4
  6. Monga M, Oglevie S. Minipercutaneous nephorlithotomy. J Endourol 2000;14:419-21
  7. Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S, et al. Singlestep percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol 2011;186:140-5
  8. De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2015;67:12137
  9. Gao XS, Liao BH, Chen YT, et al. Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol 2017;31:1101-10
  10. Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Doshi A, et al. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: A randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2013;112:355-61
  11. Ramón de Fata, García-Tello A, Andrés G, et al. Comparative study of retrograde intrarenal surgery and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of intermediate-sized kidney stones. Actas Urol Esp 2014; 38:576-83
  12. Kandemir A, Guven S, Balasar M, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney Stones. World J Urol 2017;35:1771-76.