Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 5

Evaluation of the Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Injuries with Forensic Perspective

Pages
388–392
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to achieve standardization and understand the comorbidities of plexopathy better, it would be appropriate to expand the medical data in detail.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Obstetrical brachial plexopathy (OBP) is the loss of function of the brachial plexus due to a traumatic, idiopathic, or iatrogenic reason since birth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The medical files of all cases with OBP evaluated in the 2nd Specialization Board of the Council of Forensic Medicine between 2013 and 2017 due to malpractice were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to achieve standardization and understand the comorbidities of plexopathy better, it would be appropriate to expand the medical data in detail.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Obstetrical brachial plexopathy (OBP) is the loss of function of the brachial plexus due to a traumatic, idiopathic, or iatrogenic reason since birth. OBP mostly occurs with a traumatic background that is secondary to a difficult birth. In this study, we aimed to investigate the medical characteristics of the OBP cases, which were evaluated for malpractice reasons by the Forensic Medicine and define the features that should be considered in the forensic evaluation of OBP. Methods: The medical files of all cases with OBP evaluated in the 2nd Specialization Board of the Council of Forensic Medicine between 2013 and 2017 due to malpractice were included in the study. The dates of birth, maternal ages, comorbid diseases of the mother, the number of pregnancies, birthplaces and birth weeks, birth weights, and additional comorbid pathologies were investigated retrospectively. Results: A total of 287 cases were evaluated in this study. The mean age of forensic evaluation was found to be 2.9±2.3 years. All patients were born with vaginal delivery except one caesarean case. In 55% of cases had shoulder dystocia, 16% clavicle fracture, 4% humerus fracture and humeral head dislocation were detected. 23.3% of the cases had a history of a difficult birth and 11.5 % had assisted delivery. In 45% of cases had developmental pathologies accompanied by hypotonia. None of the cases were evaluated as medical malpractice. Conclusion: Standard medical records of cases with OBPs contained sufficient information for neurological and forensic evaluation. Our study shows the OBP’s does not only originate from the traumatic etiology; about half of the cases have different comorbid pathologies, especially neurodevelopment problems. In order to achieve standardization and understand the comorbidities of plexopathy better, it would be appropriate to expand the medical data in detail.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORHAN, E. K., AKÇAKAYA, N. H., ASLIYÜKSEK, H., GÜRPINAR, K., COLAK, M. S., SEVİN, A. (2022). Evaluation of the Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Injuries with Forensic Perspective. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 5, 388–392. https://ajindex.com/articles/534999

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Coroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Coroneos MK, et al. Primary nerve repair for obstetrical brachial plexus injury: a metaanalysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:765-79
  2. Ünsal SS, Armangil M. Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Turk J Womens Health Neonatol 2020;2:47-52
  3. Heise CO, Gherpelli JLD. Prognostic relevance of risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexopathy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006;64:30-4
  4. Foad SL, Mehlman CT, Ying J. The epidemiology of neonatal brachial plexus palsy in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1258-64
  5. Yang LJS. Neonatal brachialplexus palsy, Management and prognostic factors. Semin Perinatol 2014;38:222-34
  6. Aras Y, Aydoseli A, Sabancı PA, Akcakaya MO, Alkır G, İmer M. Functional Outcomes After Treatment of Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: Clinical Study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2013;19:521-8
  7. Spires MC, Leonard JA, Wolfe J. The role of electrodiagnosis in infants with brachial plexus palsies. In: Chung KC, McGillicuddy JE, Yang LJ-S, editors. Practical Management of Adult and Pediatric Brachial Plexus Palsy. London: Elsevier; 2011. p. 68-74 8. Heise CO, Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Gherpelli JLD. Motor Nerve-Conduction Studies in Obstetric Brachial Plexopathy for a Selection of Patients with a Poor Outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1729-37
  8. Galbiatti JA, Cardoso FL, Galbiatti MGP. Obstetric Paralysis: Who is to blame? A systematic literature review. Rev Bras Ortop 2020;55:139-46
  9. Avram CM, Garg B, Skeith AE, Caughey AB. Maternal bodymass-index and neonatal brachial plexus palsy in a California Cohort. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021:1-8
  10. Vakhshori V, Bouz GJ, Alluri RK, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A, Lightdale N. Risk factors associated with neonatal brachial plexus palsy in the United States. J Pediatr Orthop B 2020;29:392-8
  11. Büken E, Büken NÖ, Büken B. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice in Turkey: incidence, impact, causes and prevention. J Clin Forensic Med 2004;11:233-47
  12. Zaami S, Busardò FP, Signore F, et al. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a population-based retrospective case-control study and medicolegal considerations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;31:1412-7
  13. McAbee GN, Ciervo C. Medical and legal issues related to brachial plexus injuries in neonates. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2006;106:209-12
  14. Abzung JM. Psychosocial Factors Are an Important Aspect of Parent and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy: Commentary on an article by Emily A. Eismann,