Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 5

Evaluation of Internal Nasal Valve Using Computed Tomography After Le Fort I Osteotomy: A CrossSectional Study from a Tertiary Center

Pages
400–404
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Maxillary surgery and surgical procedures affecting interalar width have an impact on the internal nasal valve.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Internal nasal valve, which has been the most resistant region of the nasal airway, is affected by Le Fort I osteotomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A retrospective computed tomography (CT) data of thirty-two patients who underwent Le Fort I surgery alone or combined with mandibular surgery from 2018 to 2020 were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Maxillary surgery and surgical procedures affecting interalar width have an impact on the internal nasal valve.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Internal nasal valve, which has been the most resistant region of the nasal airway, is affected by Le Fort I osteotomy. This study aimed to investigate the changes in the internal nasal valve (INV) after Le Fort I osteotomy. Methods: A retrospective computed tomography (CT) data of thirty-two patients who underwent Le Fort I surgery alone or combined with mandibular surgery from 2018 to 2020 were evaluated. INV area, INV angle, external nasal valve area, and interalar width were measured at preoperative (T1) and postoperative period (T2) on CT images. Results: CT assessment showed that the INV area was increased for both the right and left side (p1=0.005, p2=0.007). Right and left INV angle was increased from 16.15±3.240 to 19.63±5.210 and from 15.93±3.260 to 19.17±4.430 respectively (p1=0.000, p2=0.007). Interalar width was increased at the postoperative period (p=0.000). Also, the correlation between interalar width and INV area was found borderline significant (p=0.051, r=0.814). Right and left external nasal valve areas were increased after surgery (p1=0.000, p2=0.003). Conclusion: Maxillary surgery and surgical procedures affecting interalar width have an impact on the internal nasal valve.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTIN, G., DİLAVER, E., UÇKAN, S., SÜZEN, M., AK, K. B. (2022). Evaluation of Internal Nasal Valve Using Computed Tomography After Le Fort I Osteotomy: A CrossSectional Study from a Tertiary Center. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 5, 400–404. https://ajindex.com/articles/534983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Shafik AG, Alkady HA, Tawfik GM, Mohamed AM, Rabie TM, Huy NT. Computed tomography evaluation of internal nasal valve angle and area and its correlation with NOSE scale for symptomatic improvement in rhinoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2020;86:343-50
  2. Hilberg O. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. Allergy 2002;57(Suppl):5-39
  3. Murthy VA, Reddy RR, Pragadeeswaran K. Internal nasal valve and its significance. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65:400-1
  4. Moche JA, Cohen JC, Pearlman SJ. Axial computed tomography evaluation of the internal nasal valve correlates with clinical valve narrowing and patient complaint. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013;3:592-7
  5. Lee J, White WM, Constantinides M. Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments of the Nasal Valves. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42:495-511
  6. Theodore P. Michigan Manual of Plastic Surgery. In: Brown DL, Borschel GH, Levi B, editors. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 412-27
  7. Sipilä J, Suonpää J. A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997;254:387-90
  8. Stewart MG, Smith TL. Objective versus subjective outcomes assessment in rhinology. Am J Rhinol 2005;19:529-35
  9. Guenthner TA, Sather AH, Kern EB. The effect of Le Fort I maxillary impaction on nasal airway resistance. Am J Orthod 1984;85:308-15
  10. Bermüller C, Kirsche H, Rettinger G, Riechelmann H. Diagnostic accuracy of peak nasal inspiratory flow and rhinomanometry in functional rhinosurgery. Laryngoscope 2008;118:605-10
  11. Bloom JD, Sridharan S, Hagiwara M, Babb JS, White WM, Constantinides M. Reformatted computed tomography to assess the internal nasal valve and association with physical examination. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012;14:331-5
  12. Montgomery WM, Vig PS, Staab E V, Matteson SR. Computed tomography: A three-dimensional study of the nasal airway. Am J Orthod 1979;76:363-75 13. Cakmak O, Coşkun M, Celik H, Büyüklü F, Ozlüoğlu LN. Value of acoustic rhinometry for measuring nasal valve area. Laryngoscope 2003;113:295-302 14. Eliason MJ, Schafer J, Archer B, Capra G. The Impact on Nasal Septal Anatomy and Physiology Following Le Fort I Osteotomy for Orthognathic Surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2021;32:277-81
  13. Kim HS, Son JH, Chung JH, Kim KS, Choi J, Yang JY. Nasal a