Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assays

In Vitro Sitotoksisite Testleri

Pages
112–118
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The popular assays, such as MTT, MTS, XTT, WST, LDH enzyme assay, alamar blue assay, ATP bioluminescent assay have summarized in this rewiev.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chemical, biological and physical factors may cause cytotoxicity by affecting cells at different degrees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To understand the biological characteristic of a compound, it is essential to determine its toxic or non-toxic effects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The popular assays, such as MTT, MTS, XTT, WST, LDH enzyme assay, alamar blue assay, ATP bioluminescent assay have summarized in this rewiev.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:In vitro · Sitotoksisite · Hücre canlılık testleri

Abstract

Chemical, biological and physical factors may cause cytotoxicity by affecting cells at different degrees. To understand the biological characteristic of a compound, it is essential to determine its toxic or non-toxic effects. In vitro cytotoxicity assays (cell viability assays) are cell culture based measuring methods that usually used for either evaluating possible drug candidates or investigating cytotoxic profiles of some compounds. It is possible to assess many compounds in a short period of time and obtain fundamental information necessary for further animal experiments through this methods. There are many cell viability assay methods exist based on colorimetric, enzymatic, luminometric principals etc that have different mechanisms and varied sensitivity. The popular assays, such as MTT, MTS, XTT, WST, LDH enzyme assay, alamar blue assay, ATP bioluminescent assay have summarized in this rewiev.

Özet

Kimyasal ve biyolojik maddeler ya da fiziksel etkenler, hücreleri değişik derecelerde etkileyerek sitotoksisiteye yol açabilirler. Bir maddenin biyolojik davranışının anlaşılabilmesi için hücreler üzerindeki toksik ya da non-toksik etkisinin belirlenmesi gereklidir. İn vitro sitotoksisite testleri, ilaç niteliği taşıyan veya toksik profili araştırılan maddelerin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla hücre kültüründe gerçekleştirilen ölçüm metodlarıdır. Bu testlerle çok sayıda maddenin kısa sürede analiz edilmesi mümkün olmakta ve yapılacak hayvan denemeleri için temel veriler elde edilebilmektedir. Farklı mekanizmalara ve hassasiyetlere sahip çok sayıda sitotoksisite testi bulunmakla birlikte bu derlemede, araştırmacılar tarafından sıkça tercih edilen tetrazolyum testleri (MTT, MTS, XTT, WST), LDH testi, alamalar mavisi testi ve biyolüminesans testleri ele alınmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKUR, O., AKSOY, A. (2022). In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assays. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 112–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/534315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahmed SA, Gogal RM Jr, Walsh JE, 1994: A new rapid and simple non-radioactive assay to monitor and determine the proliferation of lymphocytes: an alternative to [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. J Immunol Methods, 170, 211-224. Altman FP, 1976: Tetrazolium salts and formazans. Prog Histochem Cytochem, 9(3), 3-6.
  2. Aravinthan A, Govarthanan M, Selvam K, Praburaman L, Selvankumar T, Balamurugan R, Kamala-Kannan S, Kim JH, 2015: Sunroot mediated synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of its antibacterial and rat splenocyte cytotoxic effects. Int J Nanomedicine,1977-1983.
  3. Barltrop JA, Owen TC, Cory AH, Cory JG, 1991: 5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl)-3-(4-sulfophenyl)tetrazolium, inner salt (MTS) and related analogs of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reducing to purple water-soluble formazans as cell-viability indicators. Bioorganic&Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 1, 11, 611-614.
  4. Borenfreund E, Puerner JA, 1985: Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol Lett, 24(2-3), 119-124.
  5. Connolly DT, Knight MB, Harakas NK, Wittwer AJ, Feder J, 1986: Determination of the number of endothelial cells in culture using an acid phosphatase assay. Anal Biochem, 152, 136-140.
  6. Crouch SPM, Kozlowski R, Slater KJ, Fletcher J, 1993: The use of ATP bioluminescence as a measure cell proliferation and cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods, 160, 81-88.
  7. Decker T, Lohmann-Matthes ML, 1988: A quick and simple method for the quantitation of lactate dehydrogenase release in measurements of cellular cytotoxicity and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) activity. J Immunol Methods, 15, 61-69.
  8. Denizot F, Lang R, 1986: Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and survival: Modifications to the tetrazolium dye procedure giving improved sensitivity and reliability. J Immunol Methods, 89, 271-277.
  9. Duellman SJ, Zhou W, Meisenheimer P, Vidugiris G, Cali JJ, Gautam P, Wennerberg K, Vidugiriene J, 2015: Bioluminescent, nonlytic, real-time cell viability assay and use in inhibitor screening. Assay Drug Dev Techn,13(8), 456-465.
  10. Erb RE, Ehlers MH, 1950: Resazurin reducing time as an indicator of bovine semen fertilizing capacity. J Dairy Sci, 33(12), 853-864.
  11. Fan F, Wood KV, 2007: Bioluminescent assays for high-throughput screening.Assay Drug Dev Techn, 5, 1, 127-136.
  12. Feoktistova M, Geserick P, Leverkus M, 2016: Crystal violet assay for determining viability of cultured cells. Cold Spring Ha