Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Point-of-Care Diagnostic Methods in Veterinary Microbiology

Veteriner Mikrobiyolojide Hasta/Sürü Yanında Teşhis Yöntemleri

Pages
86–92
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, diagnostic methods and technologies that allow diagnosis besides the patient/herd are mentioned, and examples of these methods are presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Point of care testing methods can be expressed as methods to diagnose the disease quickly and accurately in field conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although traditional diagnostic methods have high sensitivity and specificity, they have led to searching for alternative methods due to their long diagnosis times, labor requirements, and high costs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, diagnostic methods and technologies that allow diagnosis besides the patient/herd are mentioned, and examples of these methods are presented.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Veteriner mikrobiyoloji · hızlı tanı · hasta-sürüyanında teşhis

Abstract

Point of care testing methods can be expressed as methods to diagnose the disease quickly and accurately in field conditions. Although traditional diagnostic methods have high sensitivity and specificity, they have led to searching for alternative methods due to their long diagnosis times, labor requirements, and high costs. In veterinary medicine, well-designed patient/herd side diagnosis methods provide advantages in terms of applicability in the field since the animals are mainly located far from the center. In addition, rapid diagnosis is of critical importance in the event of a possible epidemic. In this review, diagnostic methods and technologies that allow diagnosis besides the patient/herd are mentioned, and examples of these methods are presented.

Özet

Hasta/sürü yanında teşhis yöntemleri, bir hastalığın teşhisinin saha koşullarında hızlı ve doğru bir şekilde yapılmasını amaçlayan yöntemler olarak ifade edilebilir. Geleneksel tanı yöntemleri, yüksek duyarlılık ve özgüllüğe sahip olmakla birlikte, uzun tanı süreleri ile iş gücü gereksinimleri ve yüksek maliyetleri nedeniyle, alternatif yöntem arayışlarının doğmasına neden olmuştur. Veteriner Hekimlikte, hayvanlar çoğunlukla merkeze uzak bir konumda bulunduğu için iyi tasarlanmış hasta/sürü yanı teşhis yöntemleri sahada uygulanabilirlik açısından avantaj sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca, olası bir salgın durumunda hızlı tanının çok kritik bir önemi bulunmaktadır. Bu derlemede hasta/sürü yanında teşhise olanak sağlayan tanı yöntemlerinden ve teknolojilerinden bahsedilmiş, bu yöntemlerin kullanımına ilişkin örnekler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAREYYÜPOĞLU, B., AKKOYUNLU, B. (2022). Point-of-Care Diagnostic Methods in Veterinary Microbiology. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 86–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/534159

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahmed A, Rushworth JV, Hirst NA, Millner PA, 2014: Biosensors for whole-cell bacterial detection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 27(3), 631-646.
  2. Bahadır EB, Sezgintürk MK, 2016: Lateral flow assays;Principles,designs and labels. Trends Analy Chem, 82, 286-306.
  3. Bahadır EB, Sezgintürk MK, 2014: A review on impedimetric biosensors. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 44(1), 248-262. Belák S, Ballagi-Pordány A, 1993: Application of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in veterinary diagnostic virology. Vet Res Commun, 17, 55-72.
  4. Busin V, Wells B, Kersaudy-Kerhoas M, Shu W, Burgess STG, 2016: Opportunities and challenges for the application of microfluidic Technologies in point-of-care veterinary diagnostics. Mol Cell Probes, 30, 331-341.
  5. Chang CC, Chen CC, Wei SC, Lu HH, Liang YH, Lin CW, 2012: Diagnostic Devices for Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification. Sensors, 12, 8319-8337.
  6. Chatterjee B, Kalyani N, Das S, Anand A, Sharma TK (2019). Chapter 2- Nano-realm for point-of-care (POC) bacterial diagnostics In: Methods in Microbiology, Gurtler V, Ball AS, Soni S (Ed), 19-42,
  7. Academic Press, London. Web sayfası: Anonim (1) https://www.sciencedirect.com, Erişim tarihi; 11.03.2021.
  8. Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK, 2007: Lab-on-a-chip devices for global health: past studies and future opportunities. Lab Chip, 7(1), 41-57.
  9. Cortina ME, Novak A, Melli LJ, Elena S, Corbera N, Romero JE, Nicola AM, Ugalde JE, Comerci DJ, Ciocchini AE, 2017: Development of improved enzyme-based and lateral flow immunoassays for rapid and accurate serodiagnosis of canine brucellosis. Vet Microbiol, 208, 174-180.
  10. Craw P, Balachandran W, 2012: Isothermal nucleic acid amplification technologies for point-of-care diagnostics: a critical review. Lab Chip, 12, 2469-2486.
  11. Duarte C, Costa T, Carnerio C, Soares R, Jitariu A, Cardoso S, Piedade M, Bexiga R, Freitas P, 2016: Semi-quantitative method for Streptococci magnetic detection in raw milk. Biosensors, 6(2), 19. Etayash H, Jiang K, Thundat T, Kaur K, 2014: Impedimetric Detection of Pathogenic Gram-Positive Bacteria Using an Antimicrobial Peptide from Class IIa Bacteriocins. Anal Chem, 86, 1693-1700.
  12. Fan X, White IM, Shopova SI, Zhu H, Suter JD, Sun Y, 2008: Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review. Anal Chim Acta, 620, 8-26.
  13. Galvan DD, Yu Q, 2018: Surface-enhanced raman scattering for rapid detection and characterization of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Adv Healthcare Mater, 7, 1701335. Hardt S, Schönfeld F, 2007: Microfluidic Technolo