Journals / Hand and Microsurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The status of hand therapy in Turkey

Pages
33–39
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From this perspective, under nowadays` conditions learning evaluation and treatmentmethods used by hand therapists is very important for developing the appropriate algorithm in hand rehabilitation field.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aims of this study are; firstly, to investigate professional profiles and working conditions of hand therapistswho are the member of Hand Therapists Association (HTA) (El Terapistleri Derneği - ETD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Questions are for determiningdemographical information and searching for evaluation and treatment approaches used during interventions byhand therapists.Results: Evaluation methods were examined which became their standard in the rehabilitation of tendon injuries; it wasdetermined that 44 (93.6%) of them evaluate the range of motion, 34 (72.3%) of them evaluate the pain.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From this perspective, under nowadays` conditions learning evaluation and treatmentmethods used by hand therapists is very important for developing the appropriate algorithm in hand rehabilitation field.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study are; firstly, to investigate professional profiles and working conditions of hand therapistswho are the member of Hand Therapists Association (HTA) (El Terapistleri Derneği - ETD). Secondly, to put forward theiropinions on the field of hand rehabilitation assessment and treatment. Thirdly, to determine whether a standard treatmentprotocol established in the hand therapists` applications.Methods: This study was completed through a survey sent to member physiotherapists of ETD via electronic mail. Thesurvey consists of thirty-three questions prepared in the form of multiple-choice and open-ended. Questions are for determiningdemographical information and searching for evaluation and treatment approaches used during interventions byhand therapists.Results: Evaluation methods were examined which became their standard in the rehabilitation of tendon injuries; it wasdetermined that 44 (93.6%) of them evaluate the range of motion, 34 (72.3%) of them evaluate the pain. It was determinedthat Kleinert Protocol (n = 31, %70.5) was the most preferred method in post-operative rehabilitation program of flexortendon injuries and Controlled Active Movement Protocol (n = 31, %70.5) was the most preferred method in post-operativerehabilitation program of extensor tendon injuries.Conclusion: Like all over the world, in Turkey, the hand rehabilitation is one of the fields in which physiotherapist and occupationaltherapists specialize in. The development of hand rehabilitation, more scientific and standardized evaluation andtreatment protocols are not yet completed. From this perspective, under nowadays` conditions learning evaluation and treatmentmethods used by hand therapists is very important for developing the appropriate algorithm in hand rehabilitation field.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİTİŞ, A., TONAK, H. A. (2022). The status of hand therapy in Turkey. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 33–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/533939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Polatkan S. Hand rehabilitation history process, development and current status in Turkey. In: Cerezci O, Ataker Y, Canbulat N, et al., (eds.) Hand Rehabilitation. American Hospital Publications, Istanbul, 2013
  2. Ege R. Historical development of hand surgeon in Turkey and in the World. 9. Hand and Upper Extremity Surgical Congress Book. Ankara: Turkish Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery Association Publications, 1991
  3. Oguz H. History of speciality. In: Beyazova M, Gökce Kutsal Y (eds.) Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Gunes Medicine Bookstore Publications, Ankara, 2011
  4. EFSHT, HANDGUIDE Study. Available via: http://www.eurohandtherapy.org/hand-therapy/guidelines (Accessed: December 12, 2016). 5.EFSHT, Results of Delphi round in Mallet finger for EFHST consensus. Available via: http://www.eurohandtherapy.org/files/EFSHT_Final_Delphi_Mallet.pdf (Accessed: November 10, 2016). 6.Keller JL, Caro CM, Dimick MP, Landrieu K, Fullenwider L, Walsh JM. Thirty years of hand therapy: The 2014 practice analysis. J Hand Ther 2016
  5. Pitt M, Monks T, Crowe S, Vasilakis C. Systems modelling and simulation in health service design, delivery and decision making. BMJ Qual Saf 2016
  6. Ewald S, Wendling U, IFSHT. What does the practice of hand therapy look like in IFSHT member countries? Summary of the 2014 IFSHT member survey. 2015. Available via: https://goo.gl/Etj62f (Accessed: December 17, 2016). 9.Gurses HN, Alemdaroglu I, Tanriverdi M. Investigation and curriculum analysis of the physiotherapy and rehabilitation faculty department/schools in Turkey. Turk J Physiother Rehabil 2014
  7. Jaffe R, Farney Mokris S. Edema. In: Casanova JS (ed.) Clinical Assessment Recommendations. American Society of Hand Therapists, Chicago, 1992
  8. Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL, Roberts AH, McGrouther DA, Black NA. The Patient Outcomes of Surgery-Hand/Arm (POS-Hand/Arm): a new patient-based outcome measure. J Hand Surg 2004
  9. Hoang-Kim A, Pegreffi F, Moroni A, Ladd A. Measuring wrist and hand function: common scales and checklists. Injury 2011
  10. Schoneveld K, Wittink H, Takken T. Clinimetric Evaluation of Measurement Tools Used in Hand Therapy to Assess Activity and Participation. J Hand Ther 2009
  11. Schöffl V, Heid A, Küpper T. Tendon injuries of the hand. World J Orthod 2012
  12. 62–9. 15.Voigt C. Tendon injuries of the hand. Chirurg 2002
  13. Werdin F, Schaller HE. Combined flexor tendon and