Journals / Hand and Microsurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A bibliometric picture of hand surgery subspecialty in Turkey: Where are we heading?

Pages
61–66
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is evident that more incentives are needed to increase scientific productivity and stay competitive with the rest of the world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In order to provide up-to-date and effective results for patients any medical field should bring up its academic productivity since it is a powerful indicator for the advancement of that specific research field.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Between 2008-2017, publications containing original articles and reviews published with country of origin as Turkey (CU=TURKEY) in Web of Science (WoS) indexed journals were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is evident that more incentives are needed to increase scientific productivity and stay competitive with the rest of the world.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In order to provide up-to-date and effective results for patients any medical field should bring up its academic productivity since it is a powerful indicator for the advancement of that specific research field. There are no specific studies that evaluate the current academic productivity of hand surgery at Turkey. With this study we aimed to compare and contrast the quality and the quantity of the hand surgery publications derived from Turkey for two five-year periods. Method: Between 2008-2017, publications containing original articles and reviews published with country of origin as Turkey (CU=TURKEY) in Web of Science (WoS) indexed journals were included in the study. Papers were sorted from WoS categories of surgery, orthopedics and emergency medicine. Then works containing ''Hand” as a keyword grouped into two according to the publication year, 2008-2012 and 2013-2017. The bibliometric data such as the journal in which the publication is published, index of the journal and the number of citations were compared. Results: A total of 16848 publications that meet the criteria published between the specified dates have been evaluated. 421 of these publications contain the keyword "Hand". 187 of these publications were published in between 2008 and 2012 and 234 were printed after 2012. A chi-square test showed that there was no significant association between these two periods, X2 (1, N=16848) = .206, p=.65. However, it is seen that after 2012, more publications were started to be published about orthopedics and traumatology (p = .032) and the publications were published more in high-quartile journals (p = .014). There was no significant difference between the number of citations, where average citation per paper was 3.88±5.56 (h-index:12) prior to 2012 and 4.26±6.09 (h-index:14) after (p= .505). Conclusion: Considering the tendency of total publications between 2008-2017, a significant quantitative change is not observed for the second half of this ten-year period. However, contrary to the previous period, publications were accepted by high top-tier journals. It is evident that more incentives are needed to increase scientific productivity and stay competitive with the rest of the world.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALEM, M., KOCAOGLU, H. (2022). A bibliometric picture of hand surgery subspecialty in Turkey: Where are we heading?. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 61–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/533885

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Tavakol M, Dennick R. The foundations of measurement and assessment in medical education. Medical Teacher 2017;39:1010-5
  2. Ruddell JH, Eltorai AEM, DePasse JM, Kuris EO, Gil JA, Cho DKJ, et al. Trends in the Orthopaedic Surgery Subspecialty Fellowship Match. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2018;100:e139
  3. Szabo RM. What is our identity? What is our destiny? J Hand Surg Am 2010:35:1925–37. 4. “T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Tıpta Uzmanlık Kurulu” Tüzük. Available at: https://tuk.saglik.gov.tr/ TR,30763/yururlukteki-mevzuat.html
  4. Lee RP, Venable GT, Roberts ML, Parikh KA, Taylor DR, Khan N, et al. Five-Year Institutional Bibliometric Profiles for 119 North American Neurosurgical Residency Programs: An Update. World Neurosurg 2016;95:565–75
  5. Taylor DR, Venable GT, Jones GM, Lepard JR, Roberts ML, Saleh N, et al. Five-year institutional bibliometric profiles for 103 US neurosurgical residency programs. J Neurosurg 2015;123:547–60
  6. Williams BR, Agel JA, Heest VHA. Topics in Training of Resident Publications. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2017;73:1–6
  7. Ahn CS, Li RJ, Ahn BS, Kuo P, Bryant J, Day CS. Hand and wrist research productivity in journals with high impact factors: A 20 year analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012;37:275–83
  8. Çatal B, Akman YE, Şükür E, Azboy İ. Worldwide arthroplasty research productivity and contribution of Turkey. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2018;52:376–81
  9. Gosman A, Mann K, Reid CM, Vedder NB, Janis JE. Implementing Assessment Methods in Plastic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137: 617e-623e
  10. Özbilgin Ş, Hancı V. [Anesteziyoloji alanında science citation index ve citation index-expanded ındekslenen dergilerde Türkiye kaynaklı yayınlar: Bibliografik bir analiz.][Article in Turkish]. Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dern Derg 2017;45:26–35
  11. Yalçınkaya M, Bagatur E. The congress was a great success: Yes, but what about research? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2020;54:1–3
  12. HagnerM. Open Access, data capitalism and academic publishing. Swiss Med Wkly 2018;148:146
  13. Yammine K. Open access of evidence-based publications: The case of the orthopedic and musculoskeletal literature. J Evid Based Med 2015;8: 181-4
  14. Sabharwal S, Patel N, Johal K. Open access publishing: A study of current practices in orthopaedic research. Int Orthop 2014;38:1297–302
  15. Iyandemye J, Thomas MP. Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication: A systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature. PLoS One 2019;14:1–11. 1