Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 8

Bush doctrine and its effects on world security

Bush doktrini ve dünya güvenliğine etkileri

Pages
103–122
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Instead he has got some unfavourable results (such as an increase in the competition among the great powers, the increasing problems of democratisation, the risk of civil war and insufficiency of military methods in fighting against terrorism).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After the attacks of September 11, President Bush suggested a project with the name „Broader Middle East Project‟.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the framework of that project, the President Bush claimed that the Great Middle Eastern countries would be encouraged to have peaceful and democratic regimes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Instead he has got some unfavourable results (such as an increase in the competition among the great powers, the increasing problems of democratisation, the risk of civil war and insufficiency of military methods in fighting against terrorism).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

After the attacks of September 11, President Bush suggested a project with the name „Broader Middle East Project‟. Within the framework of that project, the President Bush claimed that the Great Middle Eastern countries would be encouraged to have peaceful and democratic regimes. Within this frame, while the United States intervened into the domestic affairs of Iraq, they supported the public rebellions in Georgia, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine, they propped up the Hamas government in Paletsine and encouraged the political reforms in the Middle Eastern countries. But the President Bush could not get a favourable result. Instead he has got some unfavourable results (such as an increase in the competition among the great powers, the increasing problems of democratisation, the risk of civil war and insufficiency of military methods in fighting against terrorism).

Özet

George W. Bush, 11 Eylül saldırılarının ardından, Büyük Ortadoğu Projesini ortaya attı. Bu proje kapsamında, Başkan Bush, Büyük Ortadoğu ülkelerine demokrasi ve özgürlükler getireceğini iddia etti. Bu çerçevede, ABD, Irak‟a müdahale ederken, Kırgızistan, Ukrayna ve Gürcistan‟da meydana gelen halk ayaklanmalarına destek verdi. Filistin‟de Hamas iktidarını destekledi. Ortadoğu ülkelerindeki siyasi reformları teşvik etti. Ancak Başkan Bush, istediği sonucu elde edemedi. Aksine beklenilmeyen gelişmeler (Büyük Devletler arasındaki rekabetin artması, Demokratikleşme Sorunu ve İç Savaş Endişesi, Terörle Mücadelede askeri yöntemlerin yetersizliği gibi) ortaya çıktı.

🔖

Cite This Article

EFEGİL, E. (2022). Bush doctrine and its effects on world security. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 8, 103–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/533795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. ABD, BEYAZ SARAY, (2 Şubat 2005), “State of the Union Address” 2 Şubat 2005, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/print/20050202-11.html (Erişim Tarihi: 1 Mayıs 2006, 17:15). ABD, BEYAZ SARAY, 17 Eylül 2002, “The National Security Strategy of the United States of America”, http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/print/nssall.html (Erişim Tarihi: 1 Mayıs 2006, 17:15). BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER, (1996),
  2. Blue Helmets, The: A Review of United Nations Peace-keeping, Üçüncü Baskı, New York; Birleşmiş Milletler Yayınları. Cumhuriyet Gazetesi, (27 Aralık 2004). Cumhuriyet Gazetesi, (27 Aralık 2004).
  3. EFEGİL, Ertan, (2002), “Debating the New World Order: Global Governance vs. Multipolarity”, Ertan Efegil (der.), Geopolitics of Central Asia in the post – Cold War Era: A Systemic Analysis, Haarlem: SOTA Research Centre for Turkestan and Azerbaijan, Sayfa No. 25 – 62. EFEGİL, Ertan, (2003), “New Chapter in the Eurasia Politics After the September 11 Attacks: Reactions to the American Attempts”, Review of Social, Economic and Business Studies, Cilt 2, Sayfa No. 66 - 90. EFEGİL, Ertan, (2004), “11 Eylül Sonrası Orta Asya‟da Silâhlanma Girişimleri ve Bölge Güvenliği‟ne Etkileri”, Kamer Kasım ve Zerrin A. Bakan (der.), Uluslar arası Güvenlik Sorunları, Ankara: Avrasya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi Yayınları, Sayfa No. 141 – 153. EFEGİL, Ertan, (Bahar 2002), “11 Eylül Sonrası Büyük Devletler Arasında Artan İşbirliği”, KÖK Araştırmalar, Cilt IV, Sayı 1, Sayfa No: 163 – 172. EVANS, Greth, (11 Eylül 2003), “Why the War on Terror is not going well: Two years later”, The International Herald Tribune. EVANS, Greth, (19 Kasım 2001), “The World after 11 September: a balance sheet”, The Academy of International Business Conference, Sydney. EVANS, Greth, (20 Ocak 2004), “Building peace – and a belief in the future”, Global Agenda. EVANS, Greth, (9 Ekim 2001), “Responding to Terrorism: Where Conflict Prevention and Resolution Fit in”, Johns Hopkins University SAIS. HOLSTI, K. J., (1988), International Politics: A Framework For Analysis, New Jersey; Prentice Hall International Inc. KEGGLY, Charles W. ve Eugene R. Witthopf, (1996), American Foreign Policy: Pattern and Process, Boston; Bedford / St. Martin‟s. Radikal Gazetesi, (12 Şubat 2005). Radikal Gazetesi, (15 Nisan 2005). Radikal Gazetesi, (15 Şubat 2005). Radikal Gazetesi, (22 Şubat 2005). Radikal Gazetesi, (27 Ocak 2005).
  4. TAŞPINAR, Ömer, (18 Mayıs 2005), “ABD Özbekistan Sınavında”, Radikal Gazetesi. ULUSLAR ARASI KRİZ GRUBU, (11 Ağ