SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

An Attempt for Rereading on the Problematic of the Other in the Framework of the "Alterity" Concept

Öteki Sorunsalının "Alterite" Kavramı Çerçevesinde Yeniden Okunması Üzerine Bir Deneme

F. Hilal ONUR
Pages
255–277
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this juncture, it is argued that the relatively new phenomena of tolerance, multiculturalism and difference should be analyzed by transcending the classical assumptions of the other literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at investigating "alterity," which is one of the basic concepts of the theory of the "other" by focusing on the views of the mainstream theorists like Levinas, Kristeva and Waldenfels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As it is one of the determining features of the modern societies, the problematic nature of inclusion-exlusion should be reconsidered.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this juncture, it is argued that the relatively new phenomena of tolerance, multiculturalism and difference should be analyzed by transcending the classical assumptions of the other literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims at investigating "alterity," which is one of the basic concepts of the theory of the "other" by focusing on the views of the mainstream theorists like Levinas, Kristeva and Waldenfels. As it is one of the determining features of the modern societies, the problematic nature of inclusion-exlusion should be reconsidered. In this juncture, it is argued that the relatively new phenomena of tolerance, multiculturalism and difference should be analyzed by transcending the classical assumptions of the other literature.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, "öteki" kuramının temelini oluşturan alterite kavramı, söz konusu kuramın önde gelen yorumcuları Levinas, Kristeva ve Waldenfels-mn görüşlerinden hareketle irdelenmiştir. Zira, modern toplumların belirleyici nitelikleri arasında yer alan içleme-dışlama problematiğinin, yeni bir okumayla tekrar ele alınmasının zorunlu olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu anlamda, öteki kuramının hoşgörü, çok kültürlülük, farklılık gibi görece yeni olgularının, literatürün klasik varsayımlarını aşan bir perspektifte incelenmesinin yerinde olacağı savunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ONUR, F. H. (2022). An Attempt for Rereading on the Problematic of the Other in the Framework of the "Alterity" Concept. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 255–277. https://ajindex.com/articles/533350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Arendt, H. (1970), Vita activa öder Vom tâtigen Leben, München: Hanser. Balibar, E./ Wallerstein, I. (1990),
  2. Rasse, Klasse, Nation. Ambivalente Identitâten, Berlin/Hamburg: Argument. Bahr, H.-D. (1994),
  3. Die Sprache des Castes, Leipzig: Reclam. Bauman, Z. (1991), "Moderne und Ambivalenz", Bielefeld, U. (der.), Das Eigene und das Fremde: neuer Rassismus in der alten Welt?, Hamburg: VSA. Benhabib, S. (1999), Kültürelle Vielfalt und demokratische Gleichheit. Politische Participation im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Benjamin, W. (2000), Berliner Kindheit urn 1900, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Brown, W. (2000), "Reflexionen über Toleranz im Zeitalter der Identitat", Forst, R. (der.), Toleranz. Philosophische Grundlagen und gesellschaftliche Praxis einer umstrittenen Tugend, Frankfurt/M.: Campus. Brunkhorst, H. (1999),
  4. Hannah Arendt, München: C.H. Beck. Butler, J. (1991).
  5. Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Broch, H. (1979),
  6. Massenwahntheorie. Gesammelte Werke, End. 12, Frankfurt/ M.: Suhrkamp. Canetti, E. (1995), Masse undMacht. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Cassirer, E. (1953),
  7. Philosophic der symbolischen Formen, Wiesbaden: Herder. Danto, A. C. (1996),
  8. Kunst nach dem Ende der Kunst, München: C.H. Beck. Derrida, J. (1974),
  9. Grammatologie, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Descombes, V. (1981).
  10. Das Selbe und das Andere, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Essed, P. (1990), "Multikulturalismus und kültüreller Rassismus in den Niederlanden", Institut für Migrations- und Rassismusforschung (der.), Rassismus und Migration in Europa, Berlin/Hamburg: Argument. Elfferding, W. (1989), "Funktion und Struktur des Rassismus. Eine Theorieskizze", Autrata, O. v.d. (der.), Theorien über Rassismus, Berlin: Argument. Forst, R. (2000), "Toleranz, Gerechtigkeit und Vernunft", Forst, R. (der.), Toleranz. Philosophische Grundlagen und gesellschaftliche Praxis einer umstrittenen Tugend, Frankfurt/M.: Campus. Frankenberg, G. (1994), "Zur Alchemic von Recht und Fremdheit. Die Fremden als juridische Konstruktion", Balke, F. v.d. (der.), Schwierige Fremdheit. Über Integration und Ausgrenzung in Einwanderungslandern, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Goethe, J.W. (1999),
  11. Maximen und Reflexionen, No. 875, aktaran Höffe, O. 1999, Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, München: C.H. Beck. Hahn, A. (1994), "Die soziale Konstruktion des Fremden", Sprondel, W.M. (der.): Die Objektivitüt der Ordnung und ihre kommunikative Konstruktion, Frankfurt/M.: Fischer. Hartmann, M. (2001), "Dulden öd