SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Lucas'ta Metodolojik Bireycilik: Eleştirel Gerçekçi Bir Perspektif

Methodological Individualism in Lucas: A Critical Realist Perspective

Rojhat Berdan AVŞAR
Pages
103–113
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While Lucas' rejection of the existence of stable relations in the social realm seems to be a critique of the "closed world" reasoning, his conception of individual units makes his attempt completely futile in terms of "open system" theorizing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Lucas Critique, as a methodological critique of the so called "theory of economic policy", seems to be directed to one of the fundamental weaknesses of the conception of science and explanation underlying policy-making practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This conception of science and explanation can be called as "empirical realism", according to which there can be-stable relations between social aggregates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While Lucas' rejection of the existence of stable relations in the social realm seems to be a critique of the "closed world" reasoning, his conception of individual units makes his attempt completely futile in terms of "open system" theorizing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Lucas Critique, as a methodological critique of the so called "theory of economic policy", seems to be directed to one of the fundamental weaknesses of the conception of science and explanation underlying policy-making practices. This conception of science and explanation can be called as "empirical realism", according to which there can be-stable relations between social aggregates. According to Lucas, this is impossible due to "adaptive" (or rational) character of individual decisions (or behaviors). While Lucas' rejection of the existence of stable relations in the social realm seems to be a critique of the "closed world" reasoning, his conception of individual units makes his attempt completely futile in terms of "open system" theorizing.

Özet

Lucas'ta Metodolojik Bireycilik: Eleştirel Gerçekçi Bir Perspektif Lucas Kritiği özünde iktisat politikasına temel oluşturan teorik çerçevenin metodolojik bir eleştirisidir. Bu kritik politika yapımı pratiğinin dayandığı açıklama ve bilim kavramsallaştırmasının temel bir zayıflığını hedef almaktadır. Bu kavramsallaştırma "ampirik realizm" olarak tanımlanabilir. Ampirik realist bir çerçeveden bakıldığında, sosyal büyüklükler arasında kalıcı bir ilişki mümkündür. Ancak Lucas'a göre, bireylerin karar (ya da davranışlarının) karakterinden dolayı bu mümkün değildir. Lucas'ın bu karşı çıkışı "kapalı sistem" düşüncesinin bir eleştirisi gibi görünürken; diğer yandan kendisinin birey kavramsallaştırması bu çabasını "açık sistem" modellemesi açısından bütünüyle anlamsız kılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVŞAR, R. B. (2022). Lucas'ta Metodolojik Bireycilik: Eleştirel Gerçekçi Bir Perspektif. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 103–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/533318

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1987), "Rationality of Self and Others", in Hogarth, Robin M. and Melvin W. Reder, (ed.), Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
  2. Bache, Ida Wolden (2003), "Critical Realism and Econometrics", Norges Bank Working Papers, March 30. Bhaskar, Roy (1989),
  3. Reclaiming Reality, London: Verso. Berg, J. C. J. M. Van den and John M. Gowdy (2003), The Microfoundations of Macroeconomics: An Evolutionary Perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 65-84.
  4. Blaug, Mark (1992), The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Boumans, Marcel (1997), "Lucas and Artificial Worlds", History of Political Economy, Supplement. Froyen, Richard (1994), "Microfoundations: A Critical Inquiry", Southern Economic Journal, 61, 546-47.
  6. Horwitz, Steven (2000), Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective, London: Routledge. Hoover, Kevin (2001),
  7. Causality in Macroeconomics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Jespersen, Jesper, "Macroeconomic Methodology: A Post Keynesian Perspective", Paper (preliminary draft) prepared for the conference: Debating Ciritical Realism at Roskilde University, 17-19 August 2001.
  9. Katzner, Donald W. (1999), "Methodological Individualism and the Walrasian Tatonnement", Journal of Economic and Social Research, 1, 5-33.
  10. Kirman, Alan P. (1992), "Whom or What Does the Represenative Individual Represent?", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 117-136.
  11. Lawson, T. (1995), "The 'Lucas Critique': A Generalization", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 257-276.
  12. Lawson, T. (1997),
  13. Economics and Reality, London: Routledge. Lawson, T. (1994), "A Realist Theory for Economics", in Bachouse R. (ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology, London: Routledge. Lucas, Robert E. Jr. (1987a), "Adaptive Behavior and Economic Theory", in Hogarth, Robin M. and Melvin W. Reder, (ed.). Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  14. Lucas, Robert E. Jr. (1987b),
  15. Models of Business Cycles, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Lucas, Robert E. Jr. (1991), "Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique", in Phelps E. S. (ed.), Recent Development in Macroeconomics, Aldershot, Hants, England: E. Elgar. Lukes, Steven (1968), "Methodological Individualism Reconsidered", in Brodbeck, May, ed., Readings in Philosophy of Social Sciences, New York, Macmillan. Özel, Hüseyin (2000), "The Explanat