Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Dynamic Competition Theories of A. Smith and J. A. Schumpeter

A. Smith ve J.A. Schumpeter'in Dinamik Rekabet Teorileri

Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to point out that the disequilibrating role of competition cannot be disregarded.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to analyze dynamic competition theories of A.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the first section, a brief summary of neoclassical competition theory, which is one of the static competition concept is given.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to point out that the disequilibrating role of competition cannot be disregarded.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to analyze dynamic competition theories of A. Smith and J.A. Schumpeter. In the first section, a brief summary of neoclassical competition theory, which is one of the static competition concept is given. Then, in the same section, Adam Smith’s competition theory that includes both equilibrating and disequilibrating roles of competition at the same time is examined. When the role of competition in economic theory is analyzed in the changing capitalist system, it has been observed that competition has a dynamic character and a disequilibrating role. The focus of the second section is Schumpeter’s competition concept emphasizing the disequilibrating role of competition by advancing the “creative destruction” process. The aim of this study is to point out that the disequilibrating role of competition cannot be disregarded.

Özet

Bu çalışma, A. Smith ve J.A. Schumpeter’in dinamik rekabet teorilerini incelemektedir. Çalışmanın birinci bölümünde, önce statik rekabet teorilerinden Neoklasik rekabet anlayışı kısaca özetlenmekte, daha sonra da Adam Smith’in rekabet anlayışı denge ve dengesizlik yaratan iki farklı yönüyle birlikte ele alınmaktadır. Rekabet, kapitalizmin değişen yapısı içinde incelendiğinde dinamik özellikler göstermekte ve dengesizliklere neden olmaktadır. İkinci bölümün konusu rekabetin bu yönünü inceleyen Joseph A.Schumpeter’in “yaratıcı yıkım” etkisi ile ortaya koyduğu rekabet anlayışıdır. Amaç, rekabetin ekonomide dengesizlikler yaratan niteliğinin gözardı edilemez olduğunu ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, G. (2022). Dynamic Competition Theories of A. Smith and J. A. Schumpeter. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 1–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/533289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Akyüz, Y. (1977)
  2. Sermaye Bölüşüm Büyüme, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. Cesarattoi S. (1996) "Long-period Positions and Economic Change A Rejoinder", Review of Political Economy, 8(4), 409-425.
  3. Chipman, S.J. (1971) "The Nature and the Meaning of Equilibrium in Economic Theory" in H. Townsend (der.), Price Theory, England: Penguin Books, 241-271.
  4. Çapoğlu, G. (1991)
  5. Prices, Profits and Financial Structures, Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Dumenil, G and D. Levy (1993) The Economics of the Profit Rate: Competition, Crisis and Historical Tendencies in Capitalism, Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Dutt, A. K. (1987) "Competition, Monopoly Power and the Uniform Rate of Profits", Review of Radical Political Economics, 11(4), 55-72.
  6. Eatwell, J. (1982) "Competition" in I. Bradley ve M. Howard (eds.), Classical and Marxian Political Economy, London: Macmillan, 203-228.
  7. Ertürk, K. (1996) "On the Keynesian Notion Of Equilibrium", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 371-386.
  8. Fagerberg, J. (2003) "Schumpeter and Revial of Evalutionary Economics: Ah Appraisal of the Literature", Journal of Evalutionary Economics, 13, 125-159.
  9. Fortman, B.G. (1966)
  10. The Theory of Competition Policy, Amsterdam: North Holland. Foster, J. (2000) "Competitive Selection, Self Organization and Joseph A. Schumpeter", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(3), 311-328.
  11. Howells, J. (2000) "Technological Competition, Creative Destruction and the Competitive Process", Working Papers from Aarhus School of Business, 4, 1-23.
  12. Hunt, E.K. (1992) History of Economic Thought: A Critical Perspective, Harper Collins. Kaldor, N. (1972) "The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics", The Economic Journal, 82, 1237-1255.
  13. McNulty, P.J. (1967) "A Note on the History of Perfect Competition", The Journal of Political Economy, 65 (4), 395-399.
  14. McNulty, P.J. (1968) "Economic Theory and the Meaning of Competition", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 639-656.
  15. Nakamura, L. (2000) "Economics and the New Economy: The Invisible Hand Meets Creative Destruction", Business Review, 15-30.
  16. North, C.D. (1996) "Institutions, Organizations and Market Competition", Economics Working Paper Archive, WUSTL, 12-27.
  17. O'Dennel, L.A. (1975) "Rationalism, Capitalism and the Entrepreneur: The Views of Veblen and Schumpeter", History of Political Economy, 5, 199-214.
  18. Özel, H. (2002) "Bir Zenginlik Teorisi Olarak Klasik İktisadi Analizin Yöntemi", Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 4, 146-171.
  19. Rashid S. (1992) "Adam Smith and The Market Mechanism", History of Politic