Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Gelişme, Avrupa Birliği ile Müzakerelerden Önce Türkiye'de Gerçekten Bölgesel Bir Mesele midir?

Is Development Really a Regional Matter in Turkey Before the Negotiations with the European Union

Pages
1–11
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of empirical analysis indicated that all provinces in East Anatolia and Southeast Anatolia do not appear as a separate group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The European Union (EU) has raised the argument that East Anatolia and Southeast Anatolia regions of Turkey contain relatively less developed provinces than the others in its annual progress reports.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Regional inequalities are also stressed in the last progress report issued on 6th December 2004 by the EU.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of empirical analysis indicated that all provinces in East Anatolia and Southeast Anatolia do not appear as a separate group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The European Union (EU) has raised the argument that East Anatolia and Southeast Anatolia regions of Turkey contain relatively less developed provinces than the others in its annual progress reports. Regional inequalities are also stressed in the last progress report issued on 6th December 2004 by the EU. In this paper, this argument has been tested by applying multivariate statistical techniques (principal component analysis and cluster analysis) to 26 development indicators grouped as economic, social, educational and health variables. The results of empirical analysis indicated that all provinces in East Anatolia and Southeast Anatolia do not appear as a separate group.

Özet

Avrupa Birliği, yıllık ilerleme raporlarında Türkiye’nin Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgelerinin diğer bölgelere göre daha az gelişmiş illerden oluştuğu iddiasını ileri sürmüştür. Bölgesel dengesizlikler, 6 Aralık 2004 tarihinde yayınlanan son ilerleme raporunda da vurgulanmıştır. Bu makalede, bu iddia ekonomik, sosyal, eğitim ve sağlık olmak üzere dört grupta toplanan 26 gelişme göstergesi kullanılarak çok değişkenli istatistiksel analiz yöntemleri (temel bileşenler analizi ve kümeleme analizi) yardımıyla test edilmiştir. Ampirik analiz sonuçları Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgelerinde yer alan illerin diğer illerden farlık olarak ayrı bir grupta ortaya çıkmadığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATİK, H. (2022). Gelişme, Avrupa Birliği ile Müzakerelerden Önce Türkiye'de Gerçekten Bölgesel Bir Mesele midir?. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 1–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/533280

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adelman, I. (1958) Theories of Economic Growth and Development, Palo Alto: Stanford Press.
  2. Adelman, I. and C.T. Morris (1967) Society Politics and Economic Development: A Quantitative Approach, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  3. Ahluwalia, M. S. (1976) "Inequality, Poverty and Development", Journal of Development Economics, 3 (2), 307-342. Commission of the European Communities (2004) Regular Report on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession, Brussels: CEC. Damus, S. And K. Liljefors (2004) Analysis of Some Indicators of Economic Development of First Nation and Northern Communities, Canada: Institute on Governance, hrtp://www.iog.ca/publications/fn_dev_indicators.pdf. Hicks, N. and P. Streeten (1979) "Indicators of Development: The Search for A Basic Needs Yardstick", World Development, 7(4), 5o7-580. Land, K. (1999) "Social Indicators" in E. F. Borgatto and R. V. Montgomery (ed.), Enclopedia of Sociology, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.,18-19. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1982)
  4. The OECD List of Social Indicators, Paris: OECD. Romesbourg, C. (1984)
  5. Cluster Analysis for Researchers, Belmont: Lifetime Learning Publications. Sharpe, A. (1999) A Survey of Indicators of Economic and Social Well-Being, Canada:Centre For the Living Standards. http://www.csls.ca/reports/paper3a.pdf.
  6. SIS (2003) Social and Economic Characteristics of Population, Ankara. http://www.die.gov.tr.
  7. SIS (2004)
  8. Main Economic and Social Indicators, Ankara, http://www.die.gov.tr.