SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of the Consumer- Related Factors which Affect the Brand Extension Strategy on the Purchasing Intentions: An Empiric Study

Marka Yayma Stratejisini Etkileyen Tüketici İlişkili Faktörlerin Tüketicilerin Satın Alma Niyetleri Üzerine Etkisi: Ampirik Bir Çalışma

Cevahir UZKURT
Başak BÖLÜKBAŞI
Pages
275–305
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the research findings, the confidence to the parent brand, perceived quality of a new product and parent experience have been seen to have a significant and meaningful effect on the purchase intention of a new product.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Brand extension strategy which is the use of the existing brand name in order to enter new product categories is made use of by a great many companies at present.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consumer evaluations are undoubtedly very important in the success of the brand extension strategy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the research findings, the confidence to the parent brand, perceived quality of a new product and parent experience have been seen to have a significant and meaningful effect on the purchase intention of a new product.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Brand extension strategy which is the use of the existing brand name in order to enter new product categories is made use of by a great many companies at present. Consumer evaluations are undoubtedly very important in the success of the brand extension strategy. This study is intended to bring up the effect of the consumer- related factors which affect the brand extension strategy on the purchasing intentions about a new product. The group which best matches the target group of Levi’s brand selected for this study has been anticipated to be the university students and data have been collected from the university students in Eskişehir. Hypothesis formed in accordance with the objective of this study have been tested by regression analysis. According to the research findings, the confidence to the parent brand, perceived quality of a new product and parent experience have been seen to have a significant and meaningful effect on the purchase intention of a new product.

Özet

Yeni ürün kategorilerine girmek için mevcut marka isminin kullanılması olan marka yayma stratejisi günümüzde birçok firma tarafından kullanılmaktadır. Marka yayma stratejisinin başarısında tüketici değerlendirmeleri şüphesiz çok önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı da marka yayma stratejisini etkileyen tüketici ilişkili faktörlerin yeni ürünün satın alınma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinin ortaya konmasıdır. Çalışma için seçilen Levi’s markasının hedef kitlesine en çok uyan kesim olarak üniversite öğrencileri öngörülmüş ve veriler Eskişehir’ de bulunan üniversite öğrencilerinden toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın amacına uygun olarak oluşturulan hipotezler regresyon analizi ile test edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre ana markaya duyulan güven, yeni ürünün algılanan kalitesi ve ana marka deneyiminin yeni ürünün satın alınma niyeti üzerinde önemli ve anlamlı etkisinin olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZKURT, C., BÖLÜKBAŞI, B. (2022). The Effects of the Consumer- Related Factors which Affect the Brand Extension Strategy on the Purchasing Intentions: An Empiric Study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 275–305. https://ajindex.com/articles/533203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1990) “Brand Extensions: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly”, Sloan Management Review, (Summer), 47-56.
  2. Aaker, D. A. and K. L. Keller (1990) “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions”, Journal of Marketing, 54 (January), 27-41.
  3. Aaker, D. A. and K. Keller (1992) “The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions”, Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (1), 35-50.
  4. Aaker, D. A. (1996)
  5. Building Strong Brands, The Free Press:
  6. New York. Adaval, R. (2003) “How Good Gets and Bad Gets Worse: Understandig the Impact of Affect on Evaluations of Known Brands”, Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 352-367.
  7. Altunışık, R., R. Coşkun, S. Bayraktaroğlu ve E. Yıldırım (2005) Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı, (Gel. 4. Baskı), Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
  8. Ballester, E. D. and J. L. Aleman (2001) “Brand Trust in the Context of Consumer Loyalty”, European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1238-1258.
  9. Bhat, S. and S. K. Reddy (2001) “The Impact of Parent Attribute Associations and Affect on Brand Extension Evaluations”, Journal of Business Research, 53, 111-122.
  10. Bottomley, P. A. and J. R. Doyle (1996) “The Formation of Attitudes Towards Brand Extensions: Testing and Generalising Aaker and Keller's Model”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (4), 365-377.
  11. Boush, D., S. Shipp, B. Loken, E. Gencturk, S. Crockett, E. Kennedy, B. Minshall, D. Misurell, L. Rochford and J. Stroberl (1987) “Affect Generalization and Dissimilar Brand Extensions”, Psychology & Marketing, 4(3), 225- 237. Boush, D., and B. Loken (1991) “A Process Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluations”, Journal of marketing Research, 28 (February), 16-28.
  12. Bridges, S. (1990) A Schema Unification Model of Brand Extensions, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Broniarczyk, S. M. and J. W. Alba (1994) “The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension”, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 214-228.
  13. Chaudhuri, A. ve M.B. Holbrook (2001) “The Chain of effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty”, Journal of Marketing, 65, (April), 81-93.
  14. Chen, K. and C. Lui (2004) “Positive Brand Extension Trial and Choice of Parent Brand”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(1), 25-36.
  15. Dacin, P. A. and D. C. Smith (1994) “The Effects of Brand Portfolio Characteristics an Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions”, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(May), 229-242.
  16. Dawar, N. and P. F. Anderson (1994) “The Effects of Order and Direction o