SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

PERFORMANCE OF PRIVATE ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION FIRMS DURING ENERGY REFORM, FINANCIAL CRISES AND EU ACCESSION

Necmiddin BAĞDADİOĞLU
Özgür ARSLAN
Pages
143–159
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More importantly, the level of Operating Return on Assets is always below that of Return on Assets, suggesting that the firms are earning profit elsewhere than their own distribution activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper uses accounting measures, namely; Return on Assets and Operating Return on Assets to examine the performance of private electricity and natural gas distribution firms in Turkey through 1990-2005.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this period Turkish energy sector went through three major restructurings, each of which occurred just about a major step was taken between Turkey and European Union and during various financial crises.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More importantly, the level of Operating Return on Assets is always below that of Return on Assets, suggesting that the firms are earning profit elsewhere than their own distribution activities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Firma performansı · enerji sektörü · finansal krizler

Abstract

This paper uses accounting measures, namely; Return on Assets and Operating Return on Assets to examine the performance of private electricity and natural gas distribution firms in Turkey through 1990-2005. In this period Turkish energy sector went through three major restructurings, each of which occurred just about a major step was taken between Turkey and European Union and during various financial crises. The period also reflects any changes in the industry due to each restructuring. System-GMM methodology is employed to analyze firm level data. The findings show that the measures are negatively associated with firm size but positively related to sales growth. Moreover the debt ratio positively affects the measures during the economic expansion periods. The measures display irrelevancy to GDP and a declining pattern in time. More importantly, the level of Operating Return on Assets is always below that of Return on Assets, suggesting that the firms are earning profit elsewhere than their own distribution activities.

Özet

Bu çalışma varlıkların getirisi ve varlıkların faaliyet getirisi gibi muhasebe ölçütlerini kullanmak suretiyle 1990-2005 yılları arasında Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren özel elektrik ve doğal gaz dağıtım firmalarının performansını araştırmaktadır. Bu süreç içerisinde Türkiye’deki enerji sektörü, farklı finansal krizler ve Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği arasında atılan önemli adımların eşiğinde, üç büyük yeniden yapılandırma yaşanmıştır. Firma düzeyindeki verinin analizi için system-GMM metodolojisi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar göstermektedir ki söz konusu ölçütler firma büyüklüğü ile negatif, satışlardaki büyüme ile pozitif yönde ilişkilidir. Borçlanma oranı sadece ekonomik genişleme dönemlerinde söz konusu ölçütleri olumlu yönde etkilemektedir. Ölçütler GSYH’ya duyarsız ve zaman içerisinde düşme eğilimi göstermekte olup firmaların karlarını kendi dağıtım faaliyetlerinin dışındaki alanlarda elde ettiklerini onaylar şekilde firmaların varlıklarının faaliyet getirisi varlıkların getirisi düzeyinin hep altında yer almaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

BAĞDADİOĞLU, N., ARSLAN, Ö. (2022). PERFORMANCE OF PRIVATE ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION FIRMS DURING ENERGY REFORM, FINANCIAL CRISES AND EU ACCESSION. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 143–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/533171

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aksu, M. and A Kosedag (2006) “Transparency and Disclosure Scores and Their Determinants in the Istanbul Stock Exchange”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 277-296.
  2. Allison, G., P. Braidford, M. Houston and I. Stone (2006) “Myths Surrounding Growing a Business”, Working Paper, Durham Business School. Anderson, T.W. and C. Hsiao (1982) “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, 18, 47-82.
  3. Arellano, M., and S. Bond (1991) “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
  4. Arslan Ö., C. Florackis and A. Ozkan (2006) “The Role of Cash Holdings on Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity: Evidence from a Financial Crisis Period in an Emerging Market”, Emerging Markets Review, 7, 320 - 338. Aydogan, K. and G. Gursoy (1999) “Ownership Structure, Risk and Performance: an Empirical Investigation in Turkish Companies”, Sixth Global Finance Conference, Istanbul. Bagdadioglu, N. (2005) “The Efficiency Consequences of Resisting Changes in a Changing World: Evidence from the Turkish Electricity Distribution”, International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 1(2), 23-44.
  5. Bagdadioglu, N., P.C. Waddams and T. Weyman-Jones (2007) “Measuring Potential Gains from Mergers Among Electricity Distribution Companies in Turkey Using a Non-Parametric Model”, Energy Journal, 28(2), 83-110.
  6. Balat, M. (2008) “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey During the Past Two Decades”, Energy Policy, 36(1), 118 – 127. Caves, R.E. (1982) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Balance of Payments Report, December, 2004. Available at http://www.tcmb.gov.tr
  7. Cetin, T. and F. Oguz (2007) “The Reform in the Turkish Natural Gas Market: a Critical Evaluation”, Energy Policy, 35(7), 3856–3867.
  8. Cizre, Ü. and E. Yeldan (2005) “The Turkish Encounter with Neo-Liberalism: Economics and Politics in the 2000/2001 Crises”, Review of International Political Economy, 12(3), 387–408.
  9. Eiteman, D.K., A.I. Stonehill and M. H. Moffett (2006)
  10. Multinational Business Finance, London: Prentice Hall Erdogdu, E. (2006) “Regulatory Reform in Turkish Energy Industry: an Analysis” Energy Policy, 35(2), 984-993.
  11. ESRPSP (2004) Electricity Sector Reform and Privatization Strategy Paper. Available at http://www.oib.gov.tr
  12. Fiegenbaum, A. and A. Karnani (1991) “Output Fle