SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Pragmatism and new public management

Pragmatizm ve yenikamu işletmeciliği

Murat YILDIRIM
Pages
187–208
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The concepts that will allow us to create links between this new public management and pragmatism have been chosen and researched with a scientific exactingness, and thus it has been aimed to determine the common points between the two approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, similar characteristics between pragmatism and new public management have been tried to be put forth by means of a comparative study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study which focuses on searching the traces of pragmatism in this new public management approach, the related resources have been investigated through documentary observation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The concepts that will allow us to create links between this new public management and pragmatism have been chosen and researched with a scientific exactingness, and thus it has been aimed to determine the common points between the two approaches.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, similar characteristics between pragmatism and new public management have been tried to be put forth by means of a comparative study. In this study which focuses on searching the traces of pragmatism in this new public management approach, the related resources have been investigated through documentary observation. The concepts that will allow us to create links between this new public management and pragmatism have been chosen and researched with a scientific exactingness, and thus it has been aimed to determine the common points between the two approaches.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, pragmatizm ile yeni kamu işletmeciliği arasındaki benzer özellikler karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme ile ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. Yeni kamu işletmeciliği yaklaşımında pragmatizmin izlerini araştırmak üzerine odaklanan bu çalışmada, belgesel gözlem yöntemiyle ilgili kaynaklar incelenerek değerlendirilmiştir. Pragmatizmle yeni kamu işletmeciliği arasında bağlantılar kurulmasını sağlayacak kavramlar bilimsel bir titizlikle seçilerek irdelenmiş, böylelikle her iki yaklaşım arasındaki ortak noktaların belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, M. (2022). Pragmatism and new public management. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 187–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/533133

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Araujo, J.F.F. Esteves de and J.F. Angelino (2009) “Implementing Performance-Based Management in the Traditional Bureaucracy of Portugal”, Public Administration, 87(3), 557-573.
  2. Barzelay, M. 2001) The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  3. Bernstein, J. (2003) American Antinomianisms from Anne Hutchinson to Pragmatism, (Ph. D. Thesis), New York: The City University of New York. Blundell, B. and A. Murdock (1997)
  4. Managing in the Public Sector, Boston: Butterworth Heinemann. Catlaw, T. and J. Chapman 2007) “A Comment on Stephen Page‟s „What‟s New about the New Public Management”, Public Administration Review, March/April, 67(2), 341-342.
  5. Cejudo, G.M. 2008) “Explaining Change in the Mexican Public Sector: The Limits of New Public Management”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 741), 111-127.
  6. Christensen, T. and P. Laegreid 2007) “Introduction – Theoretical Approach and Research Questions” in T. Christensen and P. Laegreid eds.), Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, 1-16.
  7. Clarke, J., S. Gewirtz and E. McLaughlin 2000) ed.), “Reinventing the Welfare State”, New Managerialism, New Welfare?, London: Sage, 1-26.
  8. Cole, A. and G. Jones (2005) “Reshaping the State: Administrative Reform and New Public Management in France”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18(4), 567-588.
  9. Colley, L. (2002) “The Rise and Fall of the Career Public Service”, New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations, 27(3), 349-362.
  10. Çelik, S. (ed.) 2008a) “Charles Sanders Peirce‟ün Pragmatik Görüşleri ve Bilimsellik Öğesi”, Pragmatizm Pratik Bir Felsefe: Seçme Yazılar Peirce-James- Dewey), S. Çelik (Çev.), İstanbul: Doruk, 21-38.
  11. Çelik, S. (ed.) 2008b) “Önsöz”, Pragmatizm Pratik Bir Felsefe: Seçme Yazılar Peirce-James-Dewey), S. Çelik (Çev.), İstanbul: Doruk, 9-18.
  12. Danisch, R.C. (2004) Making an American Democracy: Pragmatism and the Necessity of Rhetoric, (PhD. Thesis), the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Pittsburgh. Denhardt, Janet V. and R.B. Denhardt (2006)
  13. The New Public Service, Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe Inc. Dewey, J. 2004) “Amerikan Pragmatizminin Gelişimi”, Felsefi Metinler Pragmatizm: Charles Sanders Pierce vd., İ. Doğu (Ed.), Celal Türer (Çev.), İstanbul: Üniversite Kitabevi, 27-44.
  14. Elkin, G., H.M. Cone and J. (Jim) Liao (2009) “Chinese Pragmatism and the Learning Organisation”, The Lea