SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Empirical relationship between government expenditure and government revenue based on aggregated and disaggregated data: Case of Turkey

Ampirik bağlamda toplam ve alt kalemler bazında kamu harcamaları ve kamu gelirleri arasındaki iliski: Türkiye örnegi

Rahmi YAMAK
Zehra ABDİOGLU
Pages
173–193
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that long run relationship exists between aggregated government revenue and government expenditure, disaggregated nontax normal revenue and transfer expenditure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relationship between government revenue and government expenditure is important for countries which are suffering from persistent budget deficit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we investigate evidence for cointegration and causality relationship between government revenue and government expenditure for Turkey based on aggregated and disaggregated data at the period of 1995–2003.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that long run relationship exists between aggregated government revenue and government expenditure, disaggregated nontax normal revenue and transfer expenditure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The relationship between government revenue and government expenditure is important for countries which are suffering from persistent budget deficit. In this study, we investigate evidence for cointegration and causality relationship between government revenue and government expenditure for Turkey based on aggregated and disaggregated data at the period of 1995–2003. The results show that long run relationship exists between aggregated government revenue and government expenditure, disaggregated nontax normal revenue and transfer expenditure. Granger causality test indicate evidence the spend-tax hypothesis for both aggregated and four disaggregated data.

Özet

Sürekli bütçe açıgı sorunu yasayan ülkeler açısından kamu gelirleri ile kamu harcamaları arasındaki iliski önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalısmada Türkiye için 1995–2003 döneminde kamu geliri ile kamu harcamaları arasındaki esbütünlesme ve nedensellik iliskileri hem toplam hem de alt kalemler itibariyle incelenmistir. Elde edilen sonuçlar toplam harcama ile toplam gelir arasında, alt kalemler itibariyle ise vergi dısı normal gelir ile transfer harcamaları arasında uzun dönem iliski oldugunu ortaya koymustur. Granger nedensellik testi harcama-vergi hipotezinin hem toplam hem de dört alt kalem itibariyle geçerli oldugunu göstermistir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAK, R., ABDİOGLU, Z. (2022). Empirical relationship between government expenditure and government revenue based on aggregated and disaggregated data: Case of Turkey. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 173–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/533130

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akçoraoglu, A. (1999) “Kamu Harcamaları, Kamu Gelirleri ve Keynesçi Politikalar: Bir Nedensellik Analizi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 2, 51-65.
  2. Anderson, W., M.S. Wallace and J.T. Warner (1986) “Government Spending and Taxation: What Causes What?”, Southern Economic Association, 52(3), 630-639.
  3. Aslan, M. ve M. Tasdemir (2009) “Is Fiscal Synchronization Hypothesis Relevant for Turkey? Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Tests with Endogenous Structural Breaks”, Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 12, 14-25.
  4. Barro, R.J. (1974) “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?”, Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095-1117.
  5. Buchanan, J. and R. Wagner (1977)
  6. Democracy in Deficit, New York: Academic Press.
  7. Chen, S. (2008) “Untangling the Web of Causalities among Four Disaggregate Government Expenditures, Government Revenue and Output in Taiwan”, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 6(1), 99-107.
  8. Cheng, B.S. (1999) “Causality Between Taxes and Expenditures: Evidence from Latin American Countries”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(2), 184-192.
  9. Çavusoglu, A.T. (2008) “Türkiye’de Kamu Gelirleri ile Kamu Harcamaları Arasındaki İliski Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 143-160.
  10. Darrat, A.F. (1998) “Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax? An Inquiry into the Turkish Budgetary Process”, Southern Economic Journal, 64(4), 940-956.
  11. Dickey, D. and W. Fuller (1979) “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.
  12. Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger (1987) “Co-integration and Error Correction: Represantation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
  13. Friedman, M. (1978) “The Limitations of Tax Limitation”, Policy Review, 7-14.
  14. Furstenberg, G.M., R.J. Green and J. Jeong (1986) “Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax?”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(2), 179-188.
  15. Gounder, N., P.K. Narayan. and A. Prasad (2007) “An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure: The Case of the Fiji Islands”, International Journal of Social Economics”, 34(3), 147- 158. Granger, C.W.J. (1988) “Aggregation of Time Series Variables: A Survey”, Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Discussion Paper, 1, 1-25.
  16. Granger, C.W.J. and P.L. Siklos (1995) “Systematic Sampling, Temporal Aggregation, Seasonal Adjustment, and Cointegration Theory and Evidence”, Jo