SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Tahmin kullanıcılarının hizmetindeki popüler ve önemli bir araç: ‘Yargısal düzeltmeler

A popular and important tool for forecast users: Judgmental adjustments

M. Sinan GÖNÜL
Pages
73–93
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the same time, primary research gaps are identified and an agenda for future research is provided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Judgmental adjustments’ constitute one of the popular and important tools in the arsenal of the forecasting practitioners that facilitate the integration of their judgment into the forecasting process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the current article, a literature review on this widely used method is provided.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the same time, primary research gaps are identified and an agenda for future research is provided.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Judgmental adjustments’ constitute one of the popular and important tools in the arsenal of the forecasting practitioners that facilitate the integration of their judgment into the forecasting process. In the current article, a literature review on this widely used method is provided. The motivation and reasons behind judgmental adjustments are examined followed by the recent concentrations of research on the subject. At the same time, primary research gaps are identified and an agenda for future research is provided.

Özet

Yargısal düzeltmeler’, tahmin kullanıcılarının yargılarını tahminleme sürecine katmasına olanak veren popüler ve önemli araçlarıdır. Bu çalışmada, pratisyenler tarafından oldukça yaygın olarak kullanılan bu metot hakkında bir literatür derlemesi yapılmıştır. Yargısal düzeltmelerin altında yatan sebep ve motivasyonlar anlatılmış ve ardından da son yıllarda bu konuyla ilgili yapılan bilimsel araştırmaların yoğunlaştığı alanlar incelenmiştir. Aynı zamanda, varolan araştımalardaki bazı önemli fırsatlar gösterilmiş ve gelecekteki yeni araştırmalar için bir gündem oluşturulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜL, M. S. (2022). Tahmin kullanıcılarının hizmetindeki popüler ve önemli bir araç: ‘Yargısal düzeltmeler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 73–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/533117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bunn, D.W. (1996) “Non-Traditional Methods of Forecasting”, European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 528-536.
  2. Bunn, D.W., G. Wright (1991) “Interaction of Judgmental and Statistical Forecasting Methods: Issues and Analysis”, Management Science, 37, 501-518.
  3. Carbone, R., A. Anderson, Y. Corriveau, P.P. Corson (1983) “Comparing the Different Time Series Methods: The Value of Technical Expertise, Individualized Analysis and Judgmental Adjustment”, Management Science, 29(5), 559-566.
  4. Carbone, R., W. Gorr (1985) “Accuracy of Judgmental Forecasting of Time Series”, Decision Sciences, 16, 153-160.
  5. Clements, M.P. (1995) “Rationality and the Role of Judgement in Macroeconomic Forecasting”, The Economic Journal, 105, 410-420.
  6. Deschamps, E. (2004) “The Impact of Institutional Change on Fforecast Accuracy: A Case Study of Budget Forecasting in Washington State”, International Journal of Forecasting, 20(4), 647-657.
  7. Diamantopoulos, A., B. Mathews (1989) “Factors Affecting the Nature and Effectiveness of Ssubjective Revision in Sales Forecasting: An Empirical Study,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 10, 51-59.
  8. Donihue, M.R. (1993) “Evaluating the Role Judgment Plays in Forecast Accuracy”, Journal of Forecasting, 12, 81–92.
  9. Eroğlu, C., K.L. Croxton (2010) “Biases in Judgmental Adjustments of Statistical Forecasts: The Role of Individual Differences”, International Journal of Forecasting, 26(1), 116-133.
  10. Eroğlu, C., A.M. Knemeyer (2010) “Exploring the Potential Effects of Forecaster Motivational Orientation and Gender on Judgmental Adjustments of Statistical Forecasts”, Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 179-195.
  11. Fildes, R., P. Goodwin (2007) “Against your better Judgment? How Organizations can Improve their use of Management Judgment in Forecasting”, Interfaces, 37(6), 570-576.
  12. Fildes, R., P. Goodwin, M. Lawrence, K. Nikolopoulos (2009) “Effective Forecasting and Judgmental Adjustments: An Empirical Evaluation and Strategies for Improvement in Supply-Chain Planning”, International Journal of Forecasting, 25, 3–23.
  13. Flores, B.E., D.L. Olson, C. Wolfe (1992) “Judgmental Adjustment of Forecasts: A Comparison of Methods”, International Journal of Forecasting, 7(4), 421- 433. Ghalia, M.B., P.P. Wang (2000) “Intelligent System to Support Judgmental Business Forecasting: The Case of Estimating Hotel Room Demand”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(4), 380– 397. Goodwin, P. (2000) “Improving the Voluntary Integration of Sstatistical Forecasts and Judgment”, Intern