Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Environmental kuznets curve: An Emprical evaluation by reduced and decomposed models

Çevresel kuznets eğrisi: İndirgenmiş ve ayrıştırılmış modellerle ampirik bir analiz

Pages
199–224
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Basedon estimation of decomposed forms of EKC, scale, composition and technologyeffects in EKC was verified

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, by using different models, during 1994-2010 in 26 OECDcountries, Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis and the presence ofscale, composition and technology effects in EKC was analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based onestimations of reduced and decomposed models of EKC, the presence of a Nshape relationship between ambient $CO_{2}$ and GDP per capita was found.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Basedon estimation of decomposed forms of EKC, scale, composition and technologyeffects in EKC was verified
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, by using different models, during 1994-2010 in 26 OECDcountries, Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis and the presence ofscale, composition and technology effects in EKC was analyzed. The impacts ofenvironmental policies, population density on EKC was also explored. Based onestimations of reduced and decomposed models of EKC, the presence of a Nshape relationship between ambient $CO_{2}$ and GDP per capita was found. Asimilar relationship exists between ambient $CO_{2}$ and population density. Ourmain finding is that the environmental policies led to EKC shifted down and reduced slope and intercept of EKC. Effective environmental policies can helpflatten the EKC and reduce the environmental cost of economic growth. Basedon estimation of decomposed forms of EKC, scale, composition and technologyeffects in EKC was verified

Özet

Bu çalışmada 1994-2010 dönemi için 26 OECD ülkesinde, farklı modellerkullanılarak Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi (ÇKE) varsayımının geçerliliği ve ÇKE'ninoluşumundaki ölçek, birleşim ve teknolojik etkiler incelenmektedir. Ayrıca çevrepolitikaları ve nüfus yoğunluğu gibi değişkenlerin ÇKE üzerindeki etkileri dearaştırılmaktadır. İndirgenmiş ve ayrıştırılmış modellere göre kişi başına GSYHile $CO_{2}$ emisyonu arasında N-tipli bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Benzer ilişki nüfusyoğunluğu ile $CO_{2}$ emisyonu için de geçerlidir. Çevre politikalarının uygulanması ÇKE'nin aşağıya doğru kaymasına ve eğiminin azalmasına nedenolmaktadır. Ayrıştırılmış model tahmin sonuçları ÇKE'nin oluşumundaki ölçek,birleşim ve teknolojik etkilerin geçerliliğini kanıtlamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİNÖZ, A., FOTOUREHCHİ, Z. (2022). Environmental kuznets curve: An Emprical evaluation by reduced and decomposed models. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 199–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/533103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Antweiler, W., R.B. Copeland, M.S. Taylor (2001) “Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?”, The American Economic Review, 4(2), 877–908. Beckerman, W. (1992) “Economic Growth and the Environment: Whose Growth? Whose Environment? ”, World Development, 20(4), 481-496.
  2. Birdsall, N., D. Wheeler (1993) “Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens?”, Journal of Environment and Development, 2(1), 137–149. Bruyn, S.M., R.J. Heniz (1999) The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis, Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 656-677,
  3. Chelttenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Cole, M.A., R.J.R. Elliott (2003) “Determining the Trade-Environment Composition Effect: The Role of Capital, Labor and Environmental Regulations”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 363-383.
  4. Dasgupta, S., D. Laplante, H. Wang, D. Wheeler (2002) “Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 147-168.
  5. Dinda, S. (2004) “ Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey”, Ecological Economics, 49, 431– 455. Granger,C.W.J., J. Hallman (1991) “Nonlinear Transformations of Integrated Time Series”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 12(3), 207-224.
  6. Grossman, G.M., A.B. Krueger (1991) “Environmental İmpacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement”, in NBER (Ed.), Working Paper 3914. Grossman, G.M., A.B. Krueger (1993) “Pollution and Growth: What do We Know?”, in I. Goldin, L. Winters (eds.), The Economics of Sustainable Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  7. Grossman, G., A. Krueger (1995) “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, (May), 353-77.
  8. GEMS (2012) Global Environmental Monitoring System Official Web Page. www.gemswater.org. Hausman, J.A. (1978) “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, 46, 1251- 1270. Hill, R.J., E. Magnani (2002) “An Exploration of Conceptual and Emprical Basis of Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Australian Economic Paper, 41(2), 239- 54. Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran, et al., (2003) “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
  9. Jaffe, A.B., S.R. Peterson, P.R. Portney (1995) “Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What does the Evidence Tell Us?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132-163. Jänicke, M., M. Binder, H. Mönch (1997) “Dirty Industries: Patterns of Change in Industrial Countries”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 9, 467- 491. Kaufmann, R., B. Davids