Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of relationship among manager support, organizational commitment, organizational performance, and burnout with structural equation model: The Case of government sector

Yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak yönetici desteği, örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel performans ve tükenmişlik kavramları arasındaki ilişkilerin analizi: Kamu sektöründe bir uygulama

Pages
53–69
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally experienced employees reportedless perception of performance than the other groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, using structural equation modeling, the relationships amongorganizational commitment, organizational performance and burnout wereinvestigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, it was aimed to examine whether supervisor support,mediate the relationship between organizational commitment and organizationalperformance, and between organizational commitment and burnout.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally experienced employees reportedless perception of performance than the other groups.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, using structural equation modeling, the relationships amongorganizational commitment, organizational performance and burnout wereinvestigated. In addition, it was aimed to examine whether supervisor support,mediate the relationship between organizational commitment and organizationalperformance, and between organizational commitment and burnout. In order totest the model, the questionnaire, except for the demographic questions,comprising 25 items were delivered to tax office staff working in the province ofDiyarbakir, and 203 scales were used for further analysis. As a result of this,positive and linear relationship was found between organizational commitmentand organizational performance. It was also identified negative and linearrelationship between organizational commitment and burnout. Supervisorsupport was found to partially mediate the relationship between organizationalcommitment and organizational performance, but the relationship betweenburnout and organizational commitment was not mediated by supervisor support.In addition, in terms of the demographic variables effect, women expressed moreburnout level than their male counterparts; in a similar way, managers reportedmore burnout level than regular officers. Finally experienced employees reportedless perception of performance than the other groups.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli kullanılarak, örgütsel bağlılık, örgütselperformans ve tükenmişlik kavramları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesiamaçlanmıştır. Ayrıca, yönetici desteğinin tükenmişlik ve örgütsel performansaaracı etkisinin (mediatingeffect) olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Modeli test etmekamacıyla demografik değişkenler dışında 25 soruluk bir ölçek kullanılmıştır. Buölçekler Diyarbakır Vergi Dairesi personeline dağıtılmış, elde edilen ölçeklerden203ü kullanılmıştır. Sonuçta, örgütsel bağlılık ile örgütsel performans arasındapozitif doğrusal bir ilişki tespit edilirken, örgütsel bağlılık ve tükenmişlikarasında negatif doğrusal bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yönetici desteğinin,örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel performans arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık yaptığı ancakörgütsel bağlılık ve tükenmişlik arasındaki ilişki üzerinde herhangi bir rolününolmadığı görülmüştür. Demografik değişkenlerden, kadınların erkeklere göre;yöneticilerin memurlara göre daha çok tükenmişlik içinde oldukları tespitedilmiştir. Ayrıca iş tecrübesi fazla olanların performans algılarının azaldığıgörülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÖNGÜR, A., KULA, S., EMHAN, A. (2022). Analysis of relationship among manager support, organizational commitment, organizational performance, and burnout with structural equation model: The Case of government sector. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 53–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/533099

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Anand, S., P.R. Vidyarthi, R.C. Liden, D.M. Rousseau (2010) “Good Citizens in PoorQuality Relationships: Idiosyncratic Deals as a Substitute for Relationship Quality”, The Academy of Management Journal (AMJ), 53(5), 970-988.
  2. Aselage, J., R. Eisenberger (2003) Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Contracts: A Theoretical Integration, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 491-509.
  3. Bakiev, E. (2011)
  4. Determinants of Interpersonal Trust, Organizational Commitment for Performance within Kyrgyz National Police, (unpublished dissertation), Orlando: University of Central Florida Bateman, T.S., S. Strasser (1984) “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Antecedents of Organizational Commitment”, Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 95-96.
  5. Becker, H.S. (1960) “Notes on the Concept of Commitment”, The American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-42.
  6. Blau, P.M. (1986)
  7. Exchange and Power in Social Life, NewYork: Transaction Publishers.
  8. Boon, O.K., V. Arumugam (2006) “The Influence of Corporate Culture on Organizational Commitment: Case Study of Semiconductor Organizations in Malaysia”, Sunway Academic Journal, 3, 99-115.
  9. Byrne, B.M. (2006) Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chun, Y.H., H.G. Rainey (2005) “Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 529-557.
  10. Cohen, S., T.A. Wills (1985) “Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis.”, Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
  11. Durna, U., V. Eren (2005) “Üç Bağlılık Unsuru Açısından Örgütsel Bağlılık”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2), 210-219.
  12. Eisenberger, R., S. Armeli, B. Rexwinkel, P.D. Lynch, L. Rhoades (2001) Reciprocation of Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51.
  13. Eisenberger, R., P. Fasolo, V. Davis-LaMastro (1990) “Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
  14. Eisenberger, R., R. Huntington, S. Hutchison, D. Sowa (1986) “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
  15. Fenlason, K.J., T.A. Beehr (1994) “Social Support and Occupational Stress: Effects of Talking to Others”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 157-175.
  16. Garson, G.D. (2009)
  17. Structural Equation Modeling, Erişim 26 Mart 2012, http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/structur.htm.
  18. Halbesleben, J.R.B., M.R. Bu