SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

AN EVALUATION ON RICHARD RORTY

RICHARD RORTY ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Mustafa ULUÇAKAR
Pages
229–247
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes that religion is equipped with a different function that that of classic liberalism in Rorty’s perception of pragmatism and thus, it can be used as a tool to get the communities having trouble to form a modus vivendi beyond “gemeinschaft” into the liberal internationalism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to examine Rorty’s perception of pragmatism and its reconstructing effects on classical liberalism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study begins with philosophical foundations of Rorty’s thoughts followed by his analysis of pragmatism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes that religion is equipped with a different function that that of classic liberalism in Rorty’s perception of pragmatism and thus, it can be used as a tool to get the communities having trouble to form a modus vivendi beyond “gemeinschaft” into the liberal internationalism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rorty · pragmatizm · yapısökümcülük

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine Rorty’s perception of pragmatism and its reconstructing effects on classical liberalism. The study begins with philosophical foundations of Rorty’s thoughts followed by his analysis of pragmatism. It then discusses his reconstructing effects on classical liberalism. The article concludes that religion is equipped with a different function that that of classic liberalism in Rorty’s perception of pragmatism and thus, it can be used as a tool to get the communities having trouble to form a modus vivendi beyond “gemeinschaft” into the liberal internationalism.

Özet

Bu çalısmanın temel amacı Rorty’nin, pragmatizm anlayısı ile klasik liberalizm üzerindeki yapılandırıcı etkilerini incelemektir. Çalısmada önce, Rorty’nin düsüncesinin felsefi özellikleri ile pragmatizme iliskin çözümlemelerine yer verilmistir. Daha sonra, Rorty’nin klasik liberalizm üzerindeki yeniden yapılandırıcı etkileri tartısılmıstır. Çalısmada Rorty’nin pragmatizminde, dine klasik liberalizmdekinden farklı bir kamusal islev verildigi ve böylelikle dinin, cemaat yasamı ötesinde bir siyasal toplum olusturmada zorlanan toplulukların, ikna yoluyla liberal internasyonalizmin yanına çekilebilmesine yönelik bir gereç olarak kullanılabildigi sonucuna varılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUÇAKAR, M. (2022). AN EVALUATION ON RICHARD RORTY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 229–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/533087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Crabb, C.V. Jr. (1989) American Diplomacy and the Pragmatic Tradition, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
  2. Dewey, J.D. (1988) “The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action”, in Jo A. Boydtson (ed.), The Later Works, 4, 1929, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  3. Doğan, N. (2003) “Pragmatizmin Felsefi Temelleri”, Erciyes Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 20(Ocak-Haziran), 83-93.
  4. Hassan, I. (1987) The Postmodern Turn: Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture, Columbus:Ohio State University Press.
  5. Evre, B. (2005) Postmodern Söylemin Siyaset Kuramına Etkileri, Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  6. James, W. (1975a) Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press.
  7. James, W. (1975b) The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to “Pragmatism”, Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press.
  8. Kaplama, E. (2008) Rorty’de Kamusal-Özel Alan Ayrımı, http://www.foreignpolicy.org.tr /arkaplan/eksensiz.html, erişilme tarihi: 30.12. 2013.
  9. Locke, J. (1969) “Essay Concerning the True Original Extent End of Civil Government: Second Traitese on Civil Government”, in E. Barker (ed.), Social Contract, London: Oxford University Press.
  10. Locke, J (1996) İnsan Anlığı Üzerine Bir Deneme, (Çev. İ. Çetin), İstanbul:
  11. Kabalcı Yayınevi.
  12. Morris, C. (1970) The Pragmatic Movement in American Philosophy, New York: George Braziller. Niebuhr R. (2004) Human Nature of the Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation, Westminster John Knox Press, 13-16.
  13. Özsoy, F., T. Gürsoy (2007) “Felsefe”, Eksen ÖSS Dergisi, İstanbul:
  14. Eksen Yayınları.
  15. Peirce, C.S. (1978) “Pragmatism in Retrospect: A Last Formulation” in J. Buchler (ed.), The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings, New York: AMS Press, 269– 289. Rorty, R. (1980) Philosophy and the Mirror of the Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  16. Rorty, R. (1982a) “Pragmatism, Relativism and Irrationalism”, “Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980”, in Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rorty R. (1982b) “Method, Social Science and Social Hope”, “Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980”, in Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Rorty R. (1985) “Solidarity or Objectivity”, in J. Rajchman and C. West (ed.), Post Analytic Philosophy, New York: Colombia University Press.
  18. Rorty R. (1989)
  19. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  20. Rorty R. (1991) “Freud an